mellus Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ammandel Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 Pic number 2 & 4, but I will say actually for a GEN (if it is!) the insert looks hella sloppy on pics 1 & 3! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 are u sure that one of them is gen ? cheers, Frank 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmurphy926 Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 3 is a rep (WM9 v1 or PTs)...CGs too wide and solid mid link bracelet. I'll have to study a little more on the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellus Posted March 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 are u sure that one of them is gen ? cheers, Frank ... the first one is "out of the box", no modding ... a gen insert and it will be perfect. The second one has been heavily modded, also needs a gen insert .... the inserts are on their way Thank you for looking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 ... the first one is "out of the box", no modding ... a gen insert and it will be perfect. The second one has been heavily modded, also needs a gen insert .... the inserts are on their way Thank you for looking congrats ! good work - love both of them. cheers, Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 1 is WM9 2 is a noobmariner hybrid of sorts? 3 is noob as well? arrrrgh. they're getting too good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmurphy926 Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 ... the first one is "out of the box", no modding ... a gen insert and it will be perfect. The second one has been heavily modded, also needs a gen insert .... the inserts are on their way Thank you for looking 1 and 3 are the same watch and 2 and 4 are the same watch...correct? 1/3 also need some CG modding. Nice pair!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ammandel Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 Very cool! I did think that the CGs on 1 & 3 were too "thick", but I also thought on 2 and 4 looked slightly too thin, nicely shaped but looked modded that way. I think if both inserts were swapped for gens, I wouldnt know either way. However, my opinion is no where near as valuable as B-T's for example Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellus Posted March 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 1 and 3 are the same watch and 2 and 4 are the same watch...correct? 1/3 also need some CG modding. Nice pair!! Yes, 1 and 3 are the same watch and 2 and 4 are the same watch, same perspective for better comparison ... First and third is a PT, second and fourth is a modded WM9V1 ... I like both, because of their different dials (Look at the "S" of "Submariner) and the high quality and finish. Thanks to all visitors for loking and discussing ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now