bertieng Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Shall there be any visible/physical/quality difference between the gen. to that of Clark's? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 I will not answer as I have a new special opinion on crystals. In fact, the Clark's are so good in my opinion that I wouldn't go for gen anymore...unless you need the laser edged crown of course... If I remember well, I have on here...let me know if you want it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Shall there be any visible/physical/quality difference between the gen. to that of Clark's? Thanks. check here - page 2 - : Euro i think the Clarks is good enough .... cheers, Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertieng Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Thanks for the advices. Why this issue concerns me is mainly on the optical quality of Clark's. The experiecne with the rep Sub crystal is that it has such poor optical qulaity that gives lots of interbal reflections of teh hour markers when you read the time - if you see what I mean. Looks Clark's doesn't have tgis problem. Good to knwo it may save me $150 from buying the gen. I don't need the tched crwon anyway. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now