theonewatches

Hello everyone, this is Steve and I'm back. It’s another contest between V and C. This is an unpremeditated comparison. In last November, I bought the 36mm GEN 126000 and planned to do a comprehensive comparison of this model. Later I learned that Clean was about to release this model. So I'm waiting for Clean. When I finished the comprehensive comparison of this model in the begining of this year and just about to sell the GEN. It happens that VS will also release this model, so I will definitely have to wait for VS again for the comprehensive comparison of GEN, VS and Clean. In the previous comparison of this model, Clean clearly won the competition with other factories. With the join of VS, we have to choose between the top V and C again. Now, let’s see which one is stronger. Control the bullsht, let's go. Front Dial View Light View Natural Light View The most important part is definitely the color. The color of Clean has been recognized already. Apparently, VS did not disappoint us as well. After comparing in various environments, we can find that the colors of VS and Clean should be the same, and we cannot detect any difference. Compared with GEN, the colors of the two factories are already impeccable, at least it is difficult to detect the color difference with the naked eye. Bezel View The height and width of the smooth bezel are consistent with GEN, and there is no difference to the naked eye. We can see from photo 4 that the bottom of GEN is slightly protruding. VS and Clean are the same, there is no problem for this part. Crystal Side View For the edge chamfering of Crystal, VS is closer to GEN, Clean is more obvious, so it feels smoother than GEN. It’s hard to say that who is better at this part, and there is never a fixed answer in terms of no obvious disadvantages. Crown and Stick View The crown and indexes are in excellent shape and have no obvious flaws. Luminous Fill View Although there is no harm without comparison, in terms of luminous filling details, both VSF and Clean are with full graininess, there is no winner for this part. Mimeograph Front View The top V and C have always been outstanding representatives in mimeographing. Both the three-dimensional effect and the regularity have always been at a perfect level. You never have to worry about them making mistakes in this aspect. Hands and Middle Axle View Both factories use solid central axle. Generally speaking, VS is better. The raised solid round axle is clearer and the height is closer to GEN. We can detect it from the second picture. The leaking sleeve of Clean has a slight chip and is not smooth enough, this might caused by batch issue. Rehaut View The shading of the two factories is similar. After all, the engraving process of the replica factories is the same, and there is no obvious difference in clarity. Crown Side View Case Side View Compared with the normal Oyster Perpetual model, the case shape of the Balloon Oyster Perpetual has not been changed, so there must be no problem with the watch case. This is the most basic. If the body is wrong, then there is no need to replica. Endlink View From the curvature of endlink, both factories are pretty good. Although it’s not perfect, at least they are very similar to GEN, and the feeling they presented does not make people feel awkward. I think this is enough. Caseback View Bracelet and Clasp Details View The overall bracelet gives me the feeling that the quality of the two factories is about the same. For the engraving on the clasp, Clean will be clearer, but there is no big difference in actual comparison with the naked eye. Laser Mark and Lume View Movement View The movement is still the old face of the two factories. VS is equipped with VS3235，But there is no ghost gear position. Since the VS3230 movement has been out of stock for a long time, many Rolex with no date models from VS are released with the VS3235 movement According to the factory, VS3230 movement version will be released later, but there is no specific time. Clean is equipped with VR3230. Data comparison chart Note: All watches are measured in a clamped state, and there may be errors due to the slight deviation of the position of the caliper. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve Website: High Quality replica watches shop | Rolex watches, Breitling watches, IWC watches, Omega watches, Swiss watches shop_Theonewatches.io Telegram: Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86 17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io

Hello everyone, this is Steve and I'm back. I am back with colorful colors. We have already made the comparison of the regular Oyster Perpetual model last year. This time I bring the comparison of the most expensive Oyster Perpetual model at present, which is the Celebration Oyster Perpetual, it is also called Balloon Oyster Perpetual. Although some friends already know that the best choice for this model is Clean, it is necessary to include other factories for a comprehensive comparison. As the saying goes, there is no harm without comparison, so let’s see the performance of this model from other factories as well. Forgive my nagging opening, no more nonsense, let's get started. Front Dial View View under Lamplight View under Natural light View under Sunlight For models with colored dial, color is the most important. Whose color is closer to GEN, then the winner will obviously be tilted towards the model with better color from the beginning. To put it exaggeratedly, if the color difference of other factories is too large, then although our comparison has just begun, it is actually finished. Needless to say, the eyes don't lie. We can see that Clean's color control is quite good and almost impeccable. It is highly similar to GEN in all different environments. Strictly speaking, it is slightly lighter than GEN, but such a slight color difference is obviously not important anymore, at least in terms of look and feel, the colors presented by Clean are charming. GM and BP are obviously too light and have a silvery light feel, while EW is too dark, and even the color difference of the balloons on the dial is very different. Bezel View There is no problem with the shape of bezel. After all, the Balloon Oyster Perpetual and the regular Oyster Perpetual have the same case shape. Even if the factory does not use mold-making, they could use the regular case directly. Crystal View Have you ever heard of Blade? I would like to call Clean a chamfered warrior. The crystal edge chamfering of Clean is the most obvious, and it is also same for other models from Clean. The other three factories are similar. Crown and Stick View For the crown, the curvature of the lower edge of EW’s mouth is too rounded. There is no problem with the other three factories. For the stick, I think they are similar, there is nothing to fault. Mimeograph Front View Clean is not only a chamfering warrior, but also a mimeograph veteran. Clean has always maintained excellent mimeograph details. Although they all look similar without zooming in, when we zoom in for comparison, Clean’s regularity is indeed very good, it is even not worse than GEN. Other factories can clearly see that the edges of the fonts are not flat when zooming in. This is the gap in details. By the way, let’s talk about the balloon graphics on the dial. It is not difficult to find that Clean and GEN have a smooth surface, while GM and BP show dot-like textures. EW’s green balloons are more exaggerated, with irregular textures similar to cells. Central Axle View There is no clear winner in the shape of the central axle. The shape of the leaking sleeve is similar among the four factories, but it is still a little different from GEN. Relatively speaking, Clean and GM are better, at least they look flatter and smoother, while BP is a little yellow and EW has flaws and gaps. Luminous Fill View The graininess of the hands is almost the same. GM and BP are still the old habits. The luminous filling of sticks is smooth. Clean has the strongest graininess, which is no different from GEN. EW is also good. Rehaut View The fonts’s of EW seem to be a bit bigger, Crown is also same. The shading of Clean and EW is more densely carved, so it feels better when you zoom in, while GM and BP will look a bit blurry. Crown View There is nothing to talk about in this part. The four factories all use one-gear position movement. There is no calendar ghost position. The crown of Clean’s model was not pulled out when shooting. so I explained it here. Case Side View Endlink View Whether it is the inner or outer edge curvature, Clean is obviously the best one and it is almost same as GEN. Other factories are a little sloppy, especially the lower end of the outer edge does not show a height difference. In addition, let’s focus on the first photo. The endlink of GM and BP are obviously too long. The first link of bracelet is not inside the lug, but below the lug, so GM and BP use the wrong endlink parts. This is really a bit inattentive. Caseback View I’ve seen a lot of Rolex casebacks and they all look the same, so there is really no need to comment, haha. Bracelet and Buckle Details View For the buckle engraving, Clean is obviously the best. The font shape and size are well controlled, and the engraving marks and clarity are also better. Laser Marker and Luminous View Movement View Clean, GM, and BP all use VR3230 movement, while EW still uses its old friend Hangzhou movement, A3230 movement. Everyone has also seen EW's A3235 movement. Both movements are made in Hangzhou Movement factory. Whether the movement similarity or stability, VR3230 is definitely better. Data comparison chart Note: All watches are measured in a clamped state, and there may be errors due to the slight deviation of the position of the caliper. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io

Hello everyone, this is Steve. The short vacation passed so fast. I'm back again. In the new year, let's start with the new model, the long-awaited new Daytona from Clean Factory has been released finally, so today I will bring you a comprehensive comparison of Daytona 126518 between GEN and Clean. Clean’s top details are well known, and the old Daytona has always been dominated by them, so let’s see if Clean’s new Daytona still exudes the aura of king. Year after year, I still can't get rid of the nagging prologue, stop the nonsense, let's get started. Front Dial View Light View and natural light view For models with gold case, there will be color difference between electroplated gold and real gold, so it is difficult to achieve perfect restoration, but Clean has already controlled it very well, the color is a little ligher than GEN. It is hard to avoid the color difference on the dial. Clean will be darker, but it is within the acceptable range. This does not affect anything. If you remove the GEN and look at it alone, you won't feel the color strange, this is enough. Bezel View The new Daytona adds a metal frame to the edge of the ceramic bezel, the height and thickness of the Clean's frame is consistent with GEN. Bezel Digital Fill View There are no problems with the size and spacing of the numbers, the fill color is pretty good. Crystal Side View Through comparison in reality, the edge of Clean's crystal seems to be more rounded, because Clean's edge chamfering is very sufficient, when scratched with fingers, GEN will appear sharper and Clean is smoother. Crown and Stick View The markers of the new model have become more slender, I personally think that the shape is pretty good, and they are still maintaining excellent details, the sharp corners are all chamfered. Sub-dials View The three sub-dials of the new Daytona are a little smaller than the old model, Clean dial is restored very well. The subdial's size, scale printing and the raised texture on the surface of the scale ring are all good, I can’t find any problems even by magnifying it. It is a little regrettable that the hand of chronograph hour sub-dial seems to be slightly shorter, but when we compare them side by side, it is not obvious to the naked eye. So it has no impact. For the central axles, I have to praise Clean, the solid central axles are all consistent with GEN, the most important thing is that the shape is exactly the same as GEN, the processing is very clean and no welding marks or flaws. Central Axle View This middle central axle of time hands is slightly different, the small raised dot is not obvious, it's actually hard to notice with the naked eye, so it doesn't matter, as long as the shape of the outer sleeve is consistent with GEN. Mimeograph Front View The mimeograph fonts are perfectly controlled, the brightness is completely consistent with GEN, regular and three-dimensional, the color of the red Daytona font is also very similar, all in all, no need to worry about Clean’s dial details control and process of markers, hands and printing, etc. Luminous Fill View This part is still an old rule, as long as the graininess is strong, the visual sense under high-definition view presented by Clean is still very good. Rehaut View Clean’s rehaut is very clear, not inferior to GEN in comparison, but the engraving process is different, so when you zoom in, you can see the shading is slightly different, but this does not matter. Chronograph Crown View In the tightened state, the leakage length of the button remains the same, and it is also same in the unscrewed state. Here we mainly talk about the feel. GEN’s chronograph crown has a certain sense of damping when pressed and the rebound strength is obvious. Clean is also okay, but GEN feels a little tighter when pressed and the sound sounds more delicate. Case Side View There is not much to say about the case as there is no change of case for the new Daytona model, the side shape and thickness of middle case are exactly the same. Endlink View Caseback View The height of the caseback edge is consistent with GEN and the teeth are rounded and won’t scratch your hands. In addition, the precious metal marks on the lugs are also consistent with GEN, the depth and three-dimensionality are very good. Bracelet and Buckle Details View The buckle lettering of Clean has always been very clear, although the logos of precious metal dog head and the Libra are not as three-dimensional as GEN, we can't ask for too much, after all, it is indeed difficult for the current imprint engraving to be as refined as GEN. Laser Marker and Luminous View Movement View Clean equipped with the super clone Shanghai 4131 movement which is a real mold-making movement and not modified with 4130. It is also the only super clone 4131 in the replica market at present, the actual power reserve time is around 66 to 68 hours. It is exclusively used by Clean. Data comparison chart Note: All watches are measured in a clamped state, and there may be errors due to the slight deviation of the position of the caliper. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve Website: High Quality replica watches shop | Rolex watches, Breitling watches, IWC watches, Omega watches, Swiss watches shop_Theonewatches.io Telegram: Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io

Friends, happy new year, Steve is back, Theonewatchs team resumed consulting work today. there is a huge backlog of information during the Chinese New Year, we will reply to you one by one, please be patient. the warehouse will resume QC and logistics work on February 26th, the orders that could not be completed before the Chinese New Year. please contact us in time, we will deal with it as soon as possible for you. We will work harder this year, wish you all have a good time. There is no perfect replica, only your favorite. Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io Wechat: The5711

Hello, February 10th Chinese New Year is approaching, first of all, thank you for all the friends in 2023 trust and support, more is our understanding and tolerance, there may be times because of various factors lead to some friends of the order is not satisfied, please friends understand, we always uphold the concept of service first to serve your friends. Next year we will work harder and strive to do our best to give our friends more perfect service. Theonewatchs team will be on vacation at 2:00 am on February 4, Beijing, QC deadline for February 2, shipping deadline for February 4. please have received the QC friends as soon as possible to give advice, so that we can arrange for you to ship, And as for the orders that weren't fulfilled before the holiday break, we will be back to work on February 18 to deal with the expedited for you. Thank you for your patience. During the vacation period, I will take the time to reply to your messages from time to time, and finally thank you again for all your friends. There is no perfect replica, only your favorite. Steve. Website: High Quality replica watches shop | Rolex watches, Breitling watches, IWC watches, Omega watches, Swiss watches shop_Theonewatches.io Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io Wechat: The5711

Hello, everyone. This is Steve. I am back. It is been a while since I have done a comparison, time has flown, 2023 is far away and 2024 is come, so let us start this year with this two tone Dayjust . The gold model may be a lesser choice than the steel model, but for the mature man, the two tone is a must-have, it is not quite as shiny as the full gold model, But enough to add a touch of glamor to the wrist. It is the usual [censored] opening, so please excuse me to everyone and let us get started. Dial front view Indoor cell phone shot view Since Gen was returned to its rightful owner after the shoot, I wasn't able to do an in-depth comparison of the dial colors with the factories, so color-wise you will just have to refer to the comparison view. Bezel View The teeth of EW seem to be raised slightly higher, as can be noticed by the triangular shape presented on the side, with smaller sharp corners of EW. Otherwise there are no significant differences, there are some gaps between the bezel and the case, and the side layering effect is the same as Gen. Crystal View Comparatively speaking, Clean and GM have more adequate edge chamfers, EW and DIW are lacking. Crown and Stick View The factories' crown colors are too bright, and Gen is not this yellow. From the side, the stick of all the factorys seem to be on the thicker side, which may have something to do with the difference in shooting angles. The chamfering on the edges is clearly better on Clean, but there is still a slight gap compared to Gen. Mimeograph Stick Front View Comprehensively speaking, in this regard Clean is better than other factories, both the color and brightness, it is closest to Gen, slightly regrettable is that the flatness of the surface is slightly poorer, zoom in to see, there will be some raised dots, but this does not affect the actual perception, we do not need to be too harsh. Hands Front View The luminous hands of the factories also have a certain graininess. Clean and GM will have cleaner edges, EW and Diw have a bit more burrs. Painting Font View The so-called gap only exists under magnification, under the naked eye everyone is good. Clean still maintains a high quality of printing，No worse than Gen. The other factories are not bad. Middle Axis View All factories use a solid center shaft, For the Sleeve shapes , clean and GM are much closer to Gen. Rehaut Side View As long as there is no significant difference in the shape and size of the typeface, There is no need to judge the winner，All the factories have pretty good clarity. Calender Window View There is no problem with the shape and height of windows，the chamfered edges of Clean are slightly more pronounced. Case Side View The shape of middle case needs no instruction, and if there is an obvious mistake, then it can not even be called a Rep. Zoom in View As mentioned at the beginning, from the first photo view, we can clearly see that the teeth of EW are indeed a bit higher . For the Endlink position, the difference in height between the lug and the bracelet, are all different from Gen, with Clean being slightly smaller and the other three factories are slightly larger. This has to do with the batch and the assembly, which is also the case with Gen, so it does not matter. Caseback View Bracelet Details View The most common concern with tow tone models is the leakage of steel from the bracelet, after all, in order to save time, many factories only plated the surface of the center link and not the sides. EW and Diw are in this category, while Clean and GM do not have this problem. Laser Marker and Luminous View Surprisingly Diw does not have Laser Marker, I have been looking for a long time and can not find , I wonder if it is a batch issue. Movement view Both Clean and GM use the movement VR3235, while EW and DIW use the movement A3235 (which is a Hangzhou 7 series movement), which is used in most of EW's Rolex models. In terms of movement cost alone, Clean and GM cost more, and therefore cost more. Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. Note: All watches are measured in a clamped state, and there may be errors due to the slight deviation of the position of the caliper. In addition, GEN intercepts the strap, and the factory has a steel strap protective film that has not been torn off. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io Wechat: The5711

Hello everyone, This is Steve and I am back.  Today we bring you a Comprehensive comparison of 126610LN, in the past we have taken high resolution detail shots. This time we take a different approach and instead of looking at the details, we will just look at comparison of the appearance in different light and environments, as well as comparison of the look and feel in all aspects . Gen used 23 years from the counter to buy, wear a period of time, Four factories are new and unused, in order to better compare all removed the protective film. So let us begin. Lighted side-by-side view Luminous view ----------------------------------------------- The following photos were all taken under the same light Front view and wearable drawing From the front and wearer's view alone, it can be said that all the factories have reached a level of authenticity, thanks of course to the model's own all-black color scheme. Bezel view Since Gen has been worn for a while, the fill stick will be a bit grayish. We mainly look at the Night Pearl,, VS and King are more cool-toned, Clean is more yellowish, and EW is closest to Gen. Crystal side view Leaving aside the subtle differences in shooting angles, we can see that the edge chamfers are more pronounced on Clean and King, and less so on the VS and EW. Teeth side view We can synthesize the crystal side view together, The teeth of king is slightly longer, resulting in the lower part appears not round enough, and Gen comparison can still see the difference, while the other three factories do not have obvious problems . Middle case view Backcase Edge View Rehaut view Even though the engraving process is different, there is actually no significant difference between replicas and Gen when looking at the Rehaut from this angle. Buckle view the corners of clasp are round polished at all the factories，but Clean is superior. Engraving view Although the engraving traces of replica under magnification will be different from Gen, in reality there is no difference in appearance and the clarity is similar. Cell Phone Flash View ———————————————————————— The following photos are all in natural light Front view and wearable drawing I was focused on this when I did the Hulk comparison in the first half of the year, in natural light there is no blue reflection from Gen window, we can see that VS、Clean and EW have a very distinct blue reflection, King does not. Crystal Backlight View In backlit situations, the replicas present the same visual appearance, which is commendable. Rehaut view Calendar window view Bracelet view The brushed texture makes no difference, and the overall quality and feel of VS and Clean is superior to King and EW. Wearable view in the car As long as the car costs more than Gen, it doesn't matter which factory replica you wear. What do you think? In addition we see the side of crystal, with the constant change of adjusting the angle, Gen at a certain angle reflected blue light is very obvious, VS is also not bad, the other three Factories can also reflect blue light, It is just not obvious enough and the blue isn't as bright as Gen, so it is very faint in the photos. (Both in sunlight and in natural light) _________________________________________ The following photos are all in sunlight. Wearable view Rehaut view Blu-ray effect on the side of crystal Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are taken in a snap-tight condition and may be subject to error due to slight deviations in the caliper position, in addition GEN and all factories intercept two sections of Bracelet. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io

About Parcel Returns & Exchange Buyers are free to return the parcel in 7 days if you are not satisfied with the quality of items. Before return the parcel, please make sure that the items are in same condition with the time when you open it. We will reject return or refund by the following situations: 1. Item used and appearance changed, it can't be taken back and sell them to other customers in second time. 2. Please submit your return request (https://www.theonewatches.ru/index.php?route=account/return/add) and get a RMA no. before sending the parcel back to us. Do not send them without notifaction please! It's very important. Before your sending back, we will inform you detail address with the shipping agent you should use and how to keep the package in safe to protect the items inside. Refund will be effected rapidly upon the arrival of goods and checked in normal condition. Freight for shipping the parcel will be deduced from the total order amount, the balance for the product value will be refund to buyers. No extra fees will be charged! Anyway, full refund will be paid in the situation that we sent wrong items or inferior quality products to customers, by this situation, we will take responsible for all the freight of shipping including the return shipping cost. Important Notice: Customers need take responsible for delivery charges of returned parcel while return made with no reason or any mistake occurred on us. Besides, any parcel lost, damaged should be on liability of customers. Warranty Terms and Conditions We offer a 6-months warranty for every each of our watches. Warranty time period is 6 months from QC approved date. Warranty is only applicable for NORMAL USAGE MOVEMENT. We do not cover a broken movement caused by accident or personal actions, such as: Try to open the wacth by yourself and fix it or drop the watch on a solid floor. Any repair or modification you undertake yourself or is done by a 3rd party watch-smith/modder will invalidate your warranty with us, and any repairs you wish us to undertake will be a paid repair, including shipping both ways and the customs risk in shipping to us and us shipping it back to you. We CANNOT hold responsible for water damage as there is no way of knowing whether you submerged your watch deeper than what was recommended by us in the product description. We do not guarantee physical broken caused by accident or personal actions. We keep all invoices with date stated, therefore, we know your warranty period easily. Product Replacement We will replace your order by the same unit (or different unit based on our discussion) under the conditions below: 1.You received wrong watch from what you ordered (model, brand, type, or color) 2.Your received watch is different from product description in our website 3.Your package gets seized by customs by our suggested shipping method Should you have any other doubt, please feel free to contact us. Email: service@theonewatches.io Whatsapp：+86 170 8193 4955 Line:Theonewatches

Hello and welcome to Theonewatches, I'm Steve. Here's a simple ordering guide that can help you to buy your favorite watches in a quick and easy way. 1. Confirm the model and amounts We haven’t updated all the models since here are too many models. You can send us the photos via email or whatsapp if you unable to find on the website. We can source all the models for you in rep market. 2. Methods of Payment There are two kinds of payment, please confirm with us via email or whatsapp. 1.Pay (a sum of money) before QC: We can offer you QC photos and videos after we received your $50 deposit. After you approved, you can pay the rest cost. We will arrange shipping after received it. 2.full-payout: We accept CC(Support the six major issuers), bank transfer, transfer wise, revolut, BTC and paypal. You can get more details via Payment methods. 3.More information of shopping cart guidance can be checked via ordering methods . 3. Quality Control Our stock models can do quick QC and shipping, but for the others which has to order from the factory usually need around one week. The factories who get checked or raided will need much more time. We will keep you updated in time. It’s also ok to change to any other models. Here is our stock link: https://steve888.x.yupoo.com/ (Although we will update it frequently, please confirm the inventory status with us before placing an order.) More QC information can be checked via QC PARTS 4.Telegram channel We will usually offer some promotional products and discount coupons. Please subscribe to our Telegram channel so that you can receive them in time. Here is our link: https://t.me/theonewatchesnews, please copy the link or you can scan QR code to join our channel. Please note that we only have one Telegram channel named ：Theonewatches Official News Broadcast Or you can search @Theonewatches_steve in Telegram. (Our only Telegram account) 5. Shipping Questions 1.Generally, we will use direct mail from China. As the customs in each country are different, we will always keep looking for a good transportation agent and a good shipping method to solve this problem. It will be cheaper and not slow. You can get more in the shipping section. 2.Some countries as from European Union and South American have very strict customs policies. China is famous for its replicas, which sometimes leads to packages from China being opened and possibly confiscated. We will mail it to you by triangle transportation. You can get more in the UK triangle shipping section. We will arrange a new package for you free of charge if your package is detained by the customs in any way.

Theonewatchs new mailbox (notification) Hi everyone. This is steve, We are having a problem with our mailbox Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com .It is no longer in use from now on. We are no longer able to view emails sent to us in the last 12 hours. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause. From now on we use the new mailbox : service@theonewatches.io Our mailboxes are mainly responsible for sending QC and transport information., as well as dealing with all kinds of order problems from friends. Please contact us via Whatsapp as a matter of priority for ordering enquiries. Steve Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io Wechat: The5711

The clock is ticking, what's gone are the years, what's unchanged is the heart, let the time rush away, I only care about you. Hello everyone, I am Steve, I am back. I have written comparison post after comparison post, I've bought and sold genuine watches, I've sold them and bought them again, even the battery inside the magnifying glass has been changed countless times, the supermarket bosses have asked me why the battery consumption is so big, I said I want to see the details, LOL. Recently realised that I have not been able to do the comparison of the all-gold style, that is really a dereliction of duty. A gold watch is a stage in a man's life that he must go through. It is also a style that no one can avoid, so today it comes, without a doubt, this task is of course to be given to the most representative of the big gold Rolex Day-Date, mentioning the gold watch, the vast majority of people think of the first is certainly it, after all, this series has been deeply rooted in people's hearts, whether in advertising or film have its figure. it was in the films that I got to know it when I was young. We use the genuine is from 22 years of 228238-0059 agate dial, because the replica market has not factory release this agate dial, so the replica models we are using the regular dial 228238-0004, then let us start，This is an issue of gold glitter comparison, everyone pay attention to protect your eyes, do not be flashed . LOL. Front Dial View Natural light view Light View First of all, let's explain that the agate dial is smooth, with a gold rim for the calendar and week window, and eliminates the minute circle on the dial, whereas the regular dial is radialized. Take advantage of this issue's comparisons，We can compare the colours of Wrap Gold，and for this purpose I have taken a GM and made a Wraping Gold. It is easy to see the difference in the view. The gold colour of GM and BP is too dark, whereas EW is much better and very bright. Although they are both electroplated, there are differences between the factories. After GM Wraping Gold., the brightness is obviously increased, compared to EW will be a little bit brighter, the colour is also the closest to Gen, so want to gold colour feel the smallest difference, it is best to Wrap Gold treatment. Of course, I have to admit that the colour of EW gold plating is really very good. Bezel View To the naked eye there is nothing wrong with Bezels, but after careful comparison there is a subtle difference, the tips of Gen‘s teeth are a little more rounded, All the factorys are a little too pointy. Comparatively speaking, the lines of EW are visually more pronounced and closer to Gen. Crystal Side View The chamfering of the edges is a regular detail, and all the factories are excellent，But the Crystals all seem to be slightly taller. Crown and Stick View The crowns are all in good shape, Gen's stick are genuine diamonds, All the factory are zirconia, and when I compare them side by side, I find that there is not really a big visual difference, except that the genuine diamonds shine better under the light. By zooming in and comparing, GM and BP are a little better than EW, which have an overly visible crystal tube inside.In addition, there is a small problem with all factories, the snaps on the face of stick are a little on the long side. Oil Front View The colours of three factories are almost the same, they are a little bit brighter than Gen. This is not a big problem, within the acceptable range, the surface of Gen is a little bit more granular and more delicate. Middle Axis View The Middle Axis of Gen is pleasing to the eye，We wouldn't have to be too hard on this, EW would be a little better, GM and BP solid parts are too deep. Week window view This model of Gen comes with a gold rim, which is not present on regular dial , so we won't compare the window shape. Looking mainly at the side view, EW has almost no height, GM and BP have no problems. Weekly Font View There is no need to care about the position, the replica is certainly not Gen so centred, as long as it is not drastically shifted are acceptable, QC when checking clearly on it, for the three-dimensionality of the font and the degree of regularity, GM and BP to be better, EW zoomed in to see the presence of burrs. Calendar window view There is no problem with shape and height, the edges are also chamfered, EW has a blue coating as does Gen. Gen just doesn't photograph the blue effect because of the angle, GM and BP don't, We can refer to the comparison chart at the beginning of article. Rehaut View Of the three factories, EW has a little better clarity, and the engraving marks on the surface are the same as Gen's. Crown Side View We can see that the inside of Gen is also gold-coloured when it is in the winding position after the crown has been unscrewed, and all three factories have apparently ignored this position, which can be hidden. If it had been wrap gold, this position would have been gold-coloured as well，I forgot to take a picture so explain it. Case Side View There is nothing wrong with the shape of middle case, from this view we can clearly see that all the factory’s Crystals are a little too high. Endlink Side View From the height difference between the bracelet and the lugs suggests that EW's are a little closer, but in reality this position is not too much of a concern. Caseback View We mainly look at the engraving above the lugs, first of all, to explain to you, Rolex in 2020 before the production of 18K precious metal models, the engraving is 750, the libra logo in the middle of the 750 numbers, and 2020 years after the production of the use of the latest AU750 engraving, and the librae logo in the middle of the absence of the 750 numbers, our Gen is the 2022 years, the use of the latest engraving, and all the factories are corresponding to the old version. Overall, EW has better engraving, deep and three-dimensional, especially the dog's head logo, which has some grain on the surface now . Also, we look at the screws that are leaking out, EW is gold color as Gen, but GM and BP have both ignored them. They use silver screws ，And that will be addressed in the wrapped gold treatment. Bracelet Details View The engraving on the Bracelet corresponds to the lugs, which I won't explain, but the GM and BP dog's head is really sloppy, it doesn't really matter, because even if the engraving looks similar, it is still easily distinguishable under magnification. Laser Mark View Movement View GM and BP are equipped with asian 2836 movement, also available in the A3255 movement version, and EW with A3255 movement. Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. There is nothing to say about the size, the main weight, Gen removed a sections of Bracelet, the actual total weight to 210 grams, BP and EW are steel and gold plating, so the weight difference will be so much, GM is a tungsten steel counterweight version,, than BP and EW 40 grams heavier, although compared to Gen there is still 40 grams of difference, but at least there is a certain sense of weight, will not feel light and fluffy. In addition, there is another point to explain to you, the weight of the wraped gold version of GM has not increased, this is because in the wraped gold need to scrape off the surface of the gold plating, and then wrapped, so there will be no increase in the weight of GM. Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas. (Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.) There is no perfect replica, only your favorite replica. Thanks Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: service@theonewatches.io

Hello, everyone, This is Steve and I am back  A few months ago we did a comparison of Oyster Perpetuals, but unfortunately the timing wasn't right, shortly after the post was published, VS released Oyster Perpetual, and at the time I was thinking that Clean would release as well, after all, the two top factories are competing on many models, and seeing as how VSF went into Oyster Perpetuals, how could Clean not stay still, As expected, Clean followed suit with Oyster Perpetual. So let's take a look at this territory today and see who gets a head start. Front Dial View Light View I will not comment on the colour, you can compare yourself, in the case of the existence of colour differences, it depends on personal preference, you think which one is more comfortable, then choose which one is right. After all, the level of detail of the two factories we all know very well, and then how, but also not to the point of difference. Bezel View The edges of VS don't make a rounded transition and are a bit too sharp, clean does a good job. As we can see in Figure 4 below, Gen's bezel is beyond the center shell, and VSF has a significant protrusion that is close to the width of Gen , while Clean protrudes only slightly. Crystal Side View The edges vary, Clean chamfer is adequate but seems to be layered a bit too much, whereas VSF has always been the same, with only a rounded transition on the outer edges. Crown and Stick View The surface of VS Crown is a little dirty, but that should be an isolated problem, mainly because the edges are not rounded, while Clean still maintains excellent detail. There is no such thing as a good or bad stick. Hands Luminous Fill View Both factory are nice and grainy，the same as gen. Oil Front View Oil printing has always been the strong point of two factories, regularity and fullness are done very well, we can zoom in to compare, can find its three-dimensional sense of no less than Gen. Middle Axis View Both factories use solid Middle Axis , all in all, VS is not bad, but Clean is a little better, zoom in to see, VS surface has a little flaw, not flat enough, it seems that VS need to pay attention to the quality control of the parts. Rehaut Side View The clarity of two factories is almost the same, in the view Gen is a bit brighter, in reality the comparison is not so obvious. Crown Side View When the crown is in the winding position, the stem leaks out slightly differently, Gen leaks out only the threaded part. Both factories have smooth areas, but of course that doesn't matter. Case Side View The shapes are all correct and the lugs are all curved in line with Gen Caseback View Endlink Side View Inside height difference is basically the same, outside curvature VS is a little better, Clean sinks too much. Bracelet Details View Laser Mark View There is not much to comment on here, VS and Clean look quite similar in the dark. Movement View Due to the serious shortage of VS3230 movement, this year VS in many Rolex calendarless models, are equipped with the VS3235 movement released, Oyster Perpetual is the same, although the existence of the calendar vacant gear, but after all, the energy storage here, there are gains and losses, depending on the individual, and Clean is still equipped with the old acquaintance VR3230. Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas. (Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.) There is no perfect replica, only your favorite replica. Thanks Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com

Hello, I'm Steve, I'm back. The end of the last air king comparison , we can not return to the ground for the time being , after all , the yellow lightning in the starry sky is still waiting for us , Milgauss as Rolex's super anti-magnetic models , its unique green crystal and lightning seconds hand for everyone to know , in addition to the impression of Rolex seldom have the presence of the element of orange , but individually endowed with the Milgauss this eye-catching color embellishments , which makes Milgauss look even more unique . This makes the Milgauss even more unique. For the replica, although we do not have Gen's super strong anti-magnetic ability, but its appearance is still favored by many friends, so today let's look at which lightning flash is the most shining. It is easy to get thirsty when I talk too much crap. Let's get started. Dial front view Natual Light View Light View When I first got all the watches, I realized it was a sad comparison. Thankfully the Milgauss also has a black dial, which is something I had considered before I started the preparations. After all, there is no color difference in the black dial, so why don't we see how big the color difference in the blue really is . And this is the most comprehensive exterior comparison since the comparison work began，It is also intended to give you a comprehensive view of the visual effects of lightning in different angles of the environment. The differences are still clear, and I'm tired of shooting, so I will leave the comments to you guys ,LOL. Bezel View There is no intuitive problem with the shape of the bezel, but BP is a little narrower on the side and has too much clearance from the case, and I'm curious because GM and BP claim to be the same factory on many models, just with different steels, but every time I compare them there is still a slight difference between the two. In addition, we can zoom in on Figure 1 to see that there is a clear cross-section of Gen transitioning from the front of the bezel to the side, a detail apparently overlooked by all three factories. The good news is that to the naked eye, this is not a problem. Crystal Side View The Gen crystal are green both inside and outside, the outer side of AR in this view is green, but the colour is not obvious, and if you adjust the angle of view it is sometimes transparent, whereas the Gen crystal are green no matter what the angle of view, and the outer side of the GM and BP are completely transparent. Crown and Stick View AR factory should not be updated for many years, the shape of the crown is still the same as it was many years ago, the lower edge of the mouth is too rounded, and the corners of the stick are not polished, obviously GM and BP are better in this regard. Luminous Fill View All the factories have a certain graininess, in addition we can look at the border of the large stick, probably caused by the lack of rounding, AR seems a little too wide. GM and BP are a little better. Oil font view In orange, AR has better colour control, GM and BP are a bit darker, but AR's 'ROLEX' lettering is a bit flawed, it is too thin and the closing feet are a bit long. Second hand view As with the fonts, again the AR colours are closer to Gen, with GM and BP still a little on the darker side. Middle Axis View AR uses a solid Middle Axis , but it is hidden a bit deep, GM and BP are both hollow. The centre sleeves are all pretty much the same, no winners or losers. Side Rehaut View Comparatively speaking, AR's Rehaut are superior, with better sculpted shapes and clarity than the GM and BP, whose fonts are both too short. Crown Side View The teeth are all slightly chamfered, and like Gen, they feel slightly cut to the touch. Case Side View The side shapes are all fine, regarding the engraving, AR does a great job, clear and clean , GM and BP are a little less so， the position is a little off. In addition, the engraved code for the BP is 126900, guessing that there may not have been enough of the corresponding case to go around, so an Air King case was used for assembly. Endlink Side View AR is closer on the inside, whereas for the outside, GM and BP look and feel better, with the AR gaping a little too wide. Caseback View In terms of the regularity and placement of the print, AR is better, GM is unevenly glossy when zoomed in, and the placement of BP is slightly more random. Also GM and BP have an extra 2380 engraving on the back. View of the antimagnetic cover. After opening the back cover, Gen is also covered with an anti-magnetic cover, although it is hidden inside, the three factories did not neglect this accessory, only the replicas does not have the Gen's anti-magnetic effect, but AR is more attentive, and is equipped with a waterproof gasket on the outer edge, just like the Gen. Bracelet Details View Lume View In dark environments, the graininess presented by the Lumes is very bright. The colour of AR is a bit bluish in the picture comparison, well it is not noticeable in the actual comparison . Movement View AR is equipped with the A2836 movement, which has a vacant calendar slot. Currently not available for AR's version of the A3131 movement. GM and BP are both movement A3131 and are also available as movement A2836. Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. All protective films on steel strap of replicas are not torn off. In addition, Gen intercepted three sections of the Bracelet. Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas. (Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.) There is no perfect replica, only your favorite replica. Thanks Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955  Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com

Hello, I'm Steve, I'm back, with the VSF factory also joined the Oyster Perpetual series of camp, CLean factory is finally unable to hold back, also began to expand their own product line, recently released 36mm Oyster Perpetual, Explorer I and the Air King, although these series is not particularly popular, but for the players interested in this is definitely a good news. After all, with the addition of the top factories, there will be more competition between the factories in these collections, and with competition comes better pieces, more choices for these collections, and more choices for everyone. If we stayed the same, we would have no choice in many models. All right, let's end this irrelevant nonsense and get on with the job. Front Dial View Light View The black dial and steel case are always the first choice for replicas，Putting down the magnifying glass, it is hard to see any difference. Bezel View The gap between bezel and crystal is well controlled, and the width of front and the height of side are identical to those of Gen. Crystal Side View The crystal layers are fully synchronised with Gen, and the edges are chamfered so well that you can feel a distinct step when touching it with your fingers. Stick View The chamfers on the edges of sticks are very rounded, and the corner details of Arabic numerals are also not in any way problematic. Clean factory really does have a great attention to detail. Oil font view The regularity and three-dimensionality are perfect. When we compare the font at 12 o'clock, it is easy to see that Clean's oil-printed fonts are really full, especially the "ROLEX" font. Luminous Filled View The granularity of Luminous is noticeable and the fill height is fine, These are the usual detailing that should be. Middle Axis View The Middle Axis is already very close to Gen，It is the best shape the factory can make today, It would be perfect if the cut-outs were a little smaller. Rehaut Side View The Rehaut engraving has always been clean's strong point, and the underlining is very clear, with the slight disadvantage of the crown form, Mouth is a bit crooked, which should only be an isolated engraving problem. Crown side view When in winding position after the crown has been unscrewed (Fig. 2), The shank shaft has the same length and threads as Gen. The sharp corners of the teeth are very rounded and more pronounced than even the Gen. Case side view With a case made 1 to 1, The side shape is definitely not a problem. Endlink side view There is a certain amount of sink, both inside and outside, especially on the inside, where the height difference and curvature are exactly the same as on the Gen. The sinking of the outer tips is noticeable and a bit greater than the Gen . Backcase view The teeth of the bottom cover are particularly rounded, all appearing to be a certain width, and the brushed lines in various areas are clear. Strap detail view Without going into too much detail about the strap, it's worth noting that the engraving on the Clean does have that Gen flavor to it. Laser Marker and Luminous View Movement view As usual, the movement is VR3230, with movement code engraving on the mainplate. The cleats and gears are polished in all positions. Data comparison chart Note: All measurements are taken in a snap-tight condition and may be subject to error due to slight deviations in the caliper position, also the protective film on the clean is not removed. The dimensions and thickness are basically the same as the Gen, and if you remove the protective film, the weight is almost identical. Width of the first strap section （Clean） Prior to this, other factories were using wrong cases, so the lugs were a bit wider than Gen's, including the wider strap. Instead of following the example of other factories to save time and effort, Clean has adopted 1 to 1 case and bracelet. The width of the first section of the bracelet is measured to be 18.6mm, and with a slight gap, the lug spacing is almost 19mm, which is the same as that of the Gen. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955 Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail

Hello everyone, this is Steve and I'm back. Last time we did a comparative review of the Explorer generation, so this time let's take to the sky and see how the replica factories have done with the Air King. I have to say, Rolex watch series names are quite elaborate, from the submarine in the sea, to the land explore, to the sky of the King, as well as cut through the starry sky of the Lightning (the alias of Milgauss), which is not a famous name, accidentally, exposed the next comparison model Currently the only factories producing the Air king 116900 are GM and BP, and considering that there are fewer factories involved in the comparison, we have included the JVS 126900 (JVS does not have 116900). Although there are some changes from 116900 to 126900, most of the details can still be compared with 116900, so let's start to see which factory is the King of this series. Front Dial View Natual Light View Light View There is nothing to say about the appearance, you can see for yourself, there is no chromatic aberration exists, is always good. Bezel View There is nothing wrong with the overall shape, but BP's bezel is a little narrower on the side, which is also very noticeable in person. Crystal Side View Similar or not, the chamfer on the edge of Crystal still needs to be done, apparently JVS just ignored it， GM and BP are great, very close to Gen. Digital view of Dial The dial digits are essentially the same, no better or worse. Stick View In terms of shape, none of the factories differ, with the slight disadvantage that the edges and sharp corners are not as rounded as Gen. (3, 6, 9 digits, 126900 converted to filled) Oil font view JVS's green font Rolxe is very well controlled, the colour is very close to Gen, while GM and BP are a bit more vivid. As for the shape details and fullness of the fonts, it is the same old rule that all details are equal to the naked eye, so we don't need to be overly concerned. Luminous Filled View The GM still has the old problem, the luminous fill of stick is too flat and has no grain effect, which doesn't affect the luminous effect too much, but the colour is a bit whiter than Gen in natural light, as is the case with BP and JVS. Seconds hand view For the second hand colour, GM and BP have a relatively small colour difference, JVS is beyond the acceptable range, colour is too light and lacks gloss. Also we can notice that the Gen second hand colour is the same as the ROLEX font, GM and BP are better controlled and have almost no colour difference from each other. The JVS is still the problem of the second hand, resulting in a noticeable difference in colour. Middle Axis View For the centre section, GM and BP are lacking in that their centres are hollow out, with no raised solid dots visible, while JVS is slightly more unfortunate in that the solid section is too large, and if properly adjusted would be close to the Gen. Rehaut Side View JVS has a much clearer Rehaut, GM and BP are a little less so, about the same between. Crown side view Comparatively speaking, JVS's teeth are less polished and sharper to the touch, while GM and BP are more rounded. Case side view The shape of the middle case GM and BP are not a problem, and the new version of the 126900 is the same as the Submariner shell type (crown with shoulder guard), JVS can not be compared directly with gen, but from the shape alone, there should be no problem, after all, the case is also considered to be a replica of the main body of the parts, if the main body is not correct, then what is a replica of it. Also on a side note, do you guys prefer cases with shoulder pads or without? Endlink side view Looked at a lot of models of Rolex Endlink， each slightly different, would like to ask Gen's assembly master, this is related to the assembly? haha. to return to the topic, the Endlink part of the personal opinion , as long as it is not completely flush with the lugs, in fact, are acceptable. Backcase view The edges of Gen's teeth are a similar sandblasted finish, GM and BP are slightly different but not visually obvious, whereas JVS has a very clear grain which is obviously a bit redundant. Strap detail view The details of the strap will not do too much comment, you can appraise their own (after all, it is also a high-definition macro view, with the "check" is obviously not suitable, "appraise" is not will look more advanced, haha) Laser Marker and Luminous View The factory's laser markers and luminescence have always been in the same shape, and there is nothing to compare, so I won't say more． In terms of watch style alone, the 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions of 126900 are luminous and appear sportier compared to the old 116900 version. Movement view GM and BP both use the A3131 movement, while JVS 126900 use the VR3230 movement. Data comparison chart Note: All measurements are taken with the calipers in a snug fit and may be subject to error due to slight deviations in the caliper position, and all watches, including the Gen, are covered with a protective film. In addition, as the JVS is 126900, its data is for reference only and is not to be used as a basis for comparison. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955  Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail

Hi everyone, I'm Steve, I'm back and I seem to be back more often these days, hope you don't mind, haha.  Time flies, it's been more than a year since I did this kind of work, and I still remember Steve's first comparison post started with the daytona series, and recently the APS factory also released the daytona series, and it just so happens that I still have the genuine 116500 black in my hands, so let's take this opportunity to go back to the beginning. As we all know, the market for the 4130 Daytona is currently dominated by two factories, clean and BT, and the choice of most models is either C or B. Although there are other factories joining them, they have failed to take a share of the pie from the "CB" combination. Today we will see how the newcomer APS performs. Front Dial View Natual Light View View Under Light Sunlit view By comparing the view in multiple environments, we can see the difference between the color of the subdial and the Gen. In fact, the color deviation is secondary, after all, it is inevitable, but mainly the reflectivity of the APS is a bit strong, which is where I think the most improvement is needed. Bezel View The APS bezel is also a clean factory replacement bezel, the best ceramic Daytona bezel on the market today, with the same frontal width and lateral height as the Gen. Crystal Side View The overall crystal is excellent, the thickness of the beveled edges is well controlled and the transparency I personally feel is good. Bezel Platinum coating The Bezel is filled with vacuum plated 18K white gold, the colour is a slightly greyish white rather than pure white, the colour is almost indistinguishable from Gen (some of the figures appear slightly yellowish in the comparison view as the gen has been around for some time) Crown and markers side view The overall stick and crown maintain the style of a major manufacturer, especially the rounded edges of the stick，Objectively speaking, APS has taken great care in this area of detail. Luminous Filled View The luminous filling is also very granular, especially the stick, which is not inferior to gen. Oil font View Overall, the oil print is a bit lacking and the edges are a bit irregular, but of course all the small details are equal to the naked eye (Gen and reproduction are equal), so this is a minor or major problem. However, the font "DAYTONA" is a little too bold and feels a little too big. Subdial view The length of the hands is fine, they are in line with the Gen, but the Middle Axis is slightly flawed, the centre is raised a little high and there are some burn marks. Side view of subdial In contrast to the Gen, the subdials are a bit different in terms of grain and lettering, but of course this can be ignored, and as mentioned at the beginning, the main thing is that the reflections are rather severe. Middle Axis View The Middle Axis is the same problem as the subdials, the centre is raised too high, if it were sunk a little it would be very close to the Gen. Rehaut Side View The engraving and clarity of the typeface are very good, but of course this is standard for a major manufacturer Endlink side view The curvature of Endlink presents a good feeling and is overall very similar to Gen, with the same amount of sink at the lower edge as Gen Chronograph head view In both the screwed and unscrewed position, the outer leakage of the chronograph crown remains consistent with Gen. As far as the pressing hand is concerned, after repeated tests, I personally think that APS is very good, the overall pressing and rebounding process is relatively smooth, with a strong sense of damping and rebounding, which seems to be off-topic, as these aspects are also influenced by the chronograph components of movement. Case side view You can review the data comparison chart at the end of the Comments for yourself, after all, the eye can make mistakes, but the data is not misplaced. Haha. Caseback view The detailing of the back cover is very fine, the teeth are very rounded, especially in the frosted and brushed areas, which look very clean and neat. Case engraving View The case is engraved in parallel with Gen, which lacks depth, but this is due to the difference in craftsmanship and the difference is inevitable. Bracelet Details View Check out the strap details for yourself. There is not much more to say, I'm afraid I don't have enough vocabulary, so I'll have to save it, haha. Laser Marker View The shape of the laser markers is still the same as in other reproduction factories. The gen is irregularly arranged from the side, something that no factory has done, although it is not a very important detail. Luminous View The luminous colours remain consistent. As mentioned earlier, the graininess is very strong and the actual result is the same. Since we did not open the caseback to photograph the movement, as you may know, APS is equipped with the Shanghai (VR) calibre 4130, which the factory claims to have a power reserve of 70 hours, but after actual tests, it was confirmed that the movement has a power reserve of 66-68 hours, although it does not yet reach 70 hours，But the difference is already small, as the actual kinetic reserve of each movement varies slightly. Data comparison chart Note: All watches are measured in a clamped state, and there may be errors due to the slight deviation of the position of the caliper. In addition, GEN intercepts the strap, and the factory has a steel strap protective film that has not been torn off. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve WhatsApp: + 86 17081934955 Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com

Hello everyone, it's Steve and I'm back About Rolex model comparison, we have done a lot of issues, during the period I also occasionally find time to do some other brands of comparison, but Steve is a very stubborn person, if not all the Rolex series to do a comparison, I will feel imperfect, ha ha, although this task is very difficult, but I will grasp the footsteps of continuous efforts, regardless of the models made by the popular models or the low attention. I think as long as there are friends interested in this, it can provide some reference for their choice, that is enough! So this time we bring you a comparison of the Explorer I generation. Let's cut the crap and get to the bottom of it. Front Dial View Natual Light View Under Light View The color of the dial is not much to say, it is still Steve's favorite black dial, black is good, mysterious and cool but also thin, the main thing is no color difference, ha ha. in addition, The factory claims that the GM and BP are actually from the same factory, except that the GM is made of 904 steel and the VR3230 movement, while the BP is made of 316 steel and the A3230 movement, otherwise they are the same. In fact, this is not the case, because during the comparison, I found that only some of the parts are common, but some of the details are different, probably due to the assembly, so let's compare GM and BP as two factory products. Bezel Side View From the top view alone, all the factory bezels are fine, but the differences can be seen from the side view, the side height of BP is obviously narrow, GM, EW and Gen remain the same, the slight flaw is that the gap between the bezel and the case is a bit large, Gen is almost no gap at all. Crystal Side View All factory crystals have the same edge chamfering as Gen, there is no significant difference between them, mainly in the thickness of the mirror, from the picture you can see that the BP crystal is too thick, resulting in its raised too high, and after a careful comparison of the physical found that EW is closest to Gen, GM is slightly thicker, but the impact is not significant. Markers Side View Regarding the stick, GM and BP should use the same parts, because no difference can be found in shape or details. The triangle and bar stick of GM（BP）are better, with edge chamfering , while EW is not, and the sharp corners are too sharp. But in the edge of the Arabic numerals, EW does a better job. In addition, you can look at the digital stick 3 (marked in the figure), the corner of the Gen edge is curved, not sharp. In this small detail, EW noticed and synchronized it, while GM and BP ignored it. Luminous Filled View GM is still in its usual style, the surface of the stick is smooth, as is the BP, while the EW is well filled and very grainy. The filling on the hands is not superior or inferior, we can focus on the end of the minute hand, where EW is still very commendable, because its end is sharp-angled shape, the same as the Gen, while GM and BP are flat (commonly known as scissor needles) Oil Font View Overall, the level of Oil font in the three factories is not very different, and there are no obvious mistakes, there is not much to say, anyway, in my opinion, under the naked eye are the same. Middle Axis View The Middle Axis of GM and BP is raised higher, there is almost no hollow part, so EW is better in comparison. As for the factories have burn marks on Middle Axis , we don't have to care too much Rehaut Side View The clarity of EW's Rehaut is a little better, and its backing is more densely engraved. There is not much difference between GM and BP. Their serial numbers begin with GC6, both should be the same Rehaut parts. Crown side view There is no problem with the shape of the crown, and the tips of the teeth are rounded and smooth, but the actual touch will be a little sharp, including the Gen is also the same. Case side view There is no significant difference in the shape of the case, but after careful comparison I found that all the factory‘s lugs are slightly on the fat side, but this difference is very subtle and within acceptable limits. Caseback view There is nothing to say about the Caseback, if I have to pick out some flaws, it is factorys edge of the teeth are a little sharp, EW is relatively better, but the actual touch does not feel different. In our Chinese way, that is "no matter the difference, the problem is not big." Endlink side view Regarding the curvature of the Endlink, we have done so many issues of Rolex model comparison, in fact, we also found that this has a certain relationship with the assembly, Gen will be different from model to model, even the same model will be different. So we don't need to be too concerned about that, if we look at it according to what we think is the standard, GM is a little better, BP and EW are a little too flat. Strap Details View There is nothing more to say about the strap, so check it out for yourselves. Laser Marker and Luminous View As you can see from the comparison pictures， the EW laser mark is still very clear, the GM and BP are slightly more blurred, and this is confirmed by looking at the real thing. The Luminous is not much of a differentiator, as long as there is no problem with the tint, I don't think the brightness is a factor of comparison. Movement view GM uses the VR3230 movement, BP uses the A3230 movement (based on the 2824 movement), and EW also uses the A3230 movement based on the 2824 movement, which is from Hangzhou. Data comparison chart Note: All watches are measured in a clamped state, and there may be errors due to the slight deviation of the position of the caliper. In addition, GEN intercepts the strap, and the factory has a steel strap protective film that has not been torn off. Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ Telegram: https://t.me/theonewatchesnews WhatsApp: + 86 17081934955 Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com

Hello everyone, this is Steve and I'm back. This time we bring you a comprehensive comparison of women's models. Although male friends are the majority of this forum members, there must be a certain number of female friends. We can't only focus on the comparison of male models, take care of you female friends and bring more comparisons of female models would be necessary. This is not only convenient for beauties to choose, but also allows guys to have more references and selections when choosing watches for their wife or female friends. Well, the customary opening remarks should be over, let's get into the topic and started. Front Dial View Natural Light View View Under Light For the overall appearance, YF is doing very well. The gold-plated color of the case is well controlled, and the color difference is already very small, but there is a slight difference in the center of the dial. The spiral pattern of GEN is a silvery texture which is more clear and three-dimensional, while YF feels a little obvious, their spiral pattern lacks three-dimensionality and the color is white. Bezel Side View The front width and side width of the bezel are basically same as GEN. If you have to pick out a thorn, it is that the gap between the bezel and the case of YF is slightly larger, no need to care about this too much as it might related with watch batches. Crystal Side View Same as GEN, the crystal edge of YF is chamfered obvious, the slight disadvantage is that the crystal transparency of YF is little worse through the side-by-side comparison of the real watches. Markers View There is no problem with the shape and size of Roman stick, the edges and sharp corners are chamferred sufficiently. However, except for ''I'', the letter spacing inside of YF stick are not well controlled, they are slightly oversized. Spiral Pattern View in Central Zone As mentioned in the beginning, the spiral pattern of YF lacks three-dimensional, from this detailed comparison picture, we can easily find the main cause is that the surface of spiral pattern is too smooth which makes it not obvious enough visually. Mimeograph Font View The difference in mimeograph is obvious. GEN is more regular and three-dimensional overall. In such a high-definition view, YF is a bit sloppy, but this is not a big problem. The main reason is that the swiss made font at 6 o’clock is obviously smaller than GEN. Hands and Middle Axis View Compared with GEN, the leaking part of YF middle axis is handled rougher. The welding marks are obvious, this is also a routine operation. After all, except for several popular models of top factories with delicate handling, most factories have same operations like YF in this part. Diamond Close-up View Whether you look at it from a distance or close-up, the difference in the brightness of the diamond is still very obvious. After all, YF is made of zircon, and GEN use real diamond, no need to care too much of this part. YF mainly has two problems, one is that the cylinder carrying the diamond is too short, and the other is that the height of the internal diamond inlaid bit low. Calendar Window View No need to worry too much about the slight difference in window section width, at least YF had done the hierarchical processing of sections as GEN. YF is a bit stingy for the calendar font, The date 18th of GEN is just like a strong 18-year-old boy, the font is very thick, YF seems to be stunted and too thin. Crown Side View The shape of the crown is exactly the same as GEN, including the diamond-shaped polishing on the outer edge. However, the color of the sapphire is slightly darker. Case Side View We can see from the first two pictures that the crystal of YF has fish-eye bubble lines, which is also the reason that the crystal is not so transparent like GEN. For the overall shape of case side, there is no big problem. If you look closely, you can still find that the curvature of the lugs is a bit different. We can notice the lugs of YF is a bit fatter by combining the close-up pictures of the lugs. Mainly because the upper edge is a bit higher, and the section of the lower edge is narrower, then the lugs looks a little different from GEN. Caseback View The lettering on the edge of caseback is quite clear, but the precious metal scales and the dog head logo are a bit sloppy. No more comments about the specific differences, you friends could find it by checking the pictures. Strap Details View The Gen strap is a later addition， so I can't do a comparison, but the YF strap is very nice overall with deep embossed lettering and thicker sides. Movement View The similarity of the movement on the back is very high. After all, GEN uses the ETA2892 movement, and YF adopts the corresponding Asian 2892 movement. In addition, the lettering on the automatic rotor is also very clear and regular, but there are some letters missing on the edge splint. On the whole, it's still a very good replica. Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. Above are all the details of this comparison. In the last, I would like to say a few words. Although the YF Happy Diamond is not good enough in some details, the overall similarity with GEN is relatively high. For female models, We can’t ask too much for the details, not to mention that this model has only been made by YF all the time, so it is already very good that this model can have such a level. It is not excellent, but I think it is at least meet the standard. What do you think? Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange. I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas. (Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.) Thanks Steve. Website: https://www.theonewatches.io/ WhatsApp: + 86 17081934955  Email: Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com

Hi everyone, I'm Steve, here I am again. This time I bring you a full comparison between the 126610LV GEN and several replicas! As far as style is concerned, the first generation of the submariner in the classic color scheme of black dial and green bezel is also my personal favorite! Without further crap, let's get to work! Bezel front view and side view There is no color difference with the black dial, but mainly depends on the color of the green bezel; VS and CELAN both use the clean bezel, which is claimed to be the closest to the gen, and through repeated observation and comparison in kind, the color is slightly darker than that of the GEN. Sapphire crystal side view It’s not very good to compare due to light about the comparison photos. In real life, VS and JOKER are better. (The side shape of the JOKER is closest to the GEN) Side view of the Pearl The color of the pearls all deviate from the gen, the GEN color is white with a touch of yellow! This is difficult for all factories to control, VS and GM go for white, CLEAN and JOKER go for yellow! In addition, clean’s sunken shape of the edge of the pearl is the closest to GEN. The Gen’s distance from the triangular edge of the pearl is small and all three edges are the same distance apart! All factories have at least one side that is significantly too large, obviously due to differences in the size of the cylindrical supports or deviations in the mounting position! In fact, this problem can be avoided in too much concern, and is difficult to detect with the naked eye. Bezel Marker Personally, I think the colors are pretty much the same from the factory, and the bar scales are pretty good on the inner edges of the cut corners! If you really want to differentiate, I'll leave it to you! Teeth side view The bezel shape of the VS factory is closest to the GEN, followed by the C factory, the GM oval shape is on the lean side. The JOKER's curved sharp corners are on the small side, and the overall brushed pattern is also the best restored by the VS! Dial marker side view In summary, there are no significant deviations in the shape and polish of the scales from any of the factories! There is no superiority or inferiority, which is the basic style expected of a major factory! Lume coating front view VS and Clean Factory are both quite grainy, GM and JOKER are almost smooth! Dial font view VS and C Factory continues to be better for the overall print control! Hand view VS and C Factory’s center shaft shape both have a skeletonised solid construction, although the top shape deviates. The GM and JOKER are somewhat worse, being completely closed. The edges of the hands are always in VS's favor, clean and almost burr-free, whereas all the other factories have burrs and rust! Rehaut view It goes without saying that it is obvious for the engraving on the GM and JOKER is blackened and the lettering is on the thin side Crown view The crown teeth are better rounded on VS and JOKER, CLEAN and GM are both a bit sharp Lug view We did a comparison video between the Panda Daytona 116500 and the black 116500 earlier and found that in fact the Rolex head and lugs aren't set in stone, it could have something to do with the length of wear, or it may related to the different years of production of the GEN! So I don't think this is a necessary option for your choice of comparison. The view also shows that the top of the GEN lugs does not actually sink, the VS, CLEAN and GM all sink more significantly, but the JOKER sinks the least and is closer to the GEN overall! Straps view VS and GM do a great job for the screws and slotted holes in the links of the strap, JOKER's are worse. Laser and lume view The messy arrangement of the GEN laser markers is always difficult to imitate and the VS has the most intense luminous effect. Movement view This time we took an open cap shot of the movement just to see the GEN 3235 in all details. The powerful 3235 movement is truly fascinating, with its sexy blue spring, like a beautiful woman's silky smoothness! Then the replica factories colors all look too dull, but of course we can't ask for too much, it's nice to see the overall construction in line with the GEN! The VS adopt the Danton 3235 movement, which also has the advantage of a power reserve measured at around 70 hours, which is still great! And after nearly two years of market validation, its stability is also very high! CLEAN, GM and JOKER all use the Shanghai 3235 movement, which has a measured power reserve of around 40 hours, and the feedback from the domestic market is that the return rate is high! Comparative chart of various data Note: All measurements are taken in a snug fit and may be inaccurate due to slight deviations in caliper position, all reps have protective film not removed, GEN intercepted a section of steel tape! Well, this is today's post, thank you guys for watching, if there are mistakes improper, please correct me, if there are any places I overlooked, you can put forward, I will try to add as comprehensive as possible for it, welcome to comment exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparison between the replicas and GEN, but also in order to let the guys better choose their favorite style representative, the next style we will get out of Rolex, after all, Rolex style, I believe that many guys are already very clear! Note: (Some of the photos because of the light source problems lead to deviations from the real thing, details or text descriptions, comparison picture size is relatively large, you can download down to enlarge the comparison.) Plese contact us by the following contact info if you want to purchase anything. https://www.theonewatches.io/ Email:Theonewatches.ru@gmail.com Whatsapp:+ 86 17081934955

Hello everyone, this is Steve and I'm back. Today I’m going to bring you a comprehensive comparison of the entry-level model of the Rolex - Oyster Perpetual. In the beginning of this year, I had planned to do a comparison of the Oyster Perpetual. It is not as popular as other Rolex series, after all, it is the pioneer series of Rolex watches. If we don’t have comparison for this model, it’s a bit unreasonable. Haha. Without further ado, let's get started. Front Dial View Natual Light View Light View Color difference is unavoidable for these color dials, so we have to see which is the closest. Through the comparison view, we can clearly distinguish the color differences between the factories. The colors of KING and EW are brighter, and their color is very similar, it seems that they use the same dial. The color of GM is a little bit darker. The color difference of BP is actually not very big, but its color looks a bit faded and lacks gloss, which leads to its overall feeling by the dial color is not very comfortable. In general, I personally think that the color difference of GM is the smallest. Bezel View Except for BP, the bezel shape of all factories is consistent with GEN, and the side section of the BP bezel is too thick, which makes the bezel appear a bit too large from the front. Crystal Side View For the chamfering and height of the side of crysta, GM is the closest to GEN, followed by EW. The chamfering of KING is too much, resulting in obvious layers, while BP is slightly lower in height. Crown and Markers View GM’s crown logo has the smoothest edge chamfering treatment, and the overall shape among GM, KING and EW are very similar, no big different with GEN. While BP is slightly different, mainly because of its slope width is a bit narrower. Hands Luminous Fill View All factories have a certain luminous graininess, there is not obvious difference for this part. Dial Mimeograph Front View Relatively speaking, the regularity of BP fonts is slightly worse, and the mimeograph thickness and three-dimensional effect of other factories are similar. Let's take a look at the opening of crown at 6 o'clock. Except for EW, the other three factories have relatively large deviations. Of course, this might caused by batch issue of the factories. In addition, let’s talk about the dial. From the high-definition pictures, we can see that all factories’ dial is actually a grainy dial but not a glossy dial like GEN. It is just invisible to the naked eye and non closeup photos. King and EW are slightly better, the graininess is not particularly noticeable. Hands and Middle Axis Dial Compared with GEN, the leaking cylindrical part of the middle axis is different from each factory. Relatively speaking, GM and EW are closer to GEN. The flaw of BP is the most obvious, the hollow part in the middle is too large, and the processing is relatively rough, with obvious welding marks. Rehaut Side View In terms of the overall lettering shape and clarity, there is no obvious difference between the factories. If you have to score high and low, I personally think that KING is slightly better. Zoom in on the picture to see that the edges of KING’s font are more regular, and the shading is more clearer. Crown Side View There is nothing to say about the crown as there is no problem with the appearance and size. It feels a bit scratchy when you tough the crown of King, mainly because the teeth are not chamfered. Case Side View According to the past habits, usually, we don’t comment on the case, but I noticed it this time, so mentioned here. It is not difficult to find through the pictures. Compared with GEN, the curvature of the lug end of GM and BP seems to be more downward. I found that it is indeed the case by comparing with real watches.So KING and EW are naturally the winners in terms of case shape. Caseback View No more comments for the caseback, You friends can compare it in accordance with the photo. Steve is still in a hurry to write the next comparison, haha. Endlink Side View In terms of endlink, it is very difficult for factories to be completely consistent with GEN. In my opinion, as long as the lugs are not completely flush, it is within the acceptable range. Obviously, EW and BP are not good. GM is the best in this part and it is the closest to GEN, followed by KING. Bracelet Details View For the engraving inside the buckle, factories are different. EW’s overall engraving lines looks more comfortable. GM and KING lack clarity, and a few small engraving dots below the ''ROKEXSA'' font of BP is missing. Laser Mark and Lume View Although the laser marks appear slightly different in the picture, there is no difference in reality. KING's luminous color is different, it is more green than GEN, and the other three factories are consistent with GEN. Movement View GM and KING use the VR3230 movement, while EW and BP are A3230 movement which is modified and based on the 2824 movement. After all, their prices are cheaper. Compared with other factories, EW and BP have always take the cheap route, so it is justifiable to adopt the cheaper movement for these two factories. Data Comparison View Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas. (Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.) There is no perfect replica, only your favorite replica. Thanks Steve.

Hello, guys. I'm Steve and I'm back. We've been working on male models comparisons for a while now, until recently I realized that we hadn't done any female comparisons, so here it is. Although there are only two factories producing tanks, AF and K11, and most friends are familiar with the best options for this model, I think it's important to bring this comparison, after all, it is one of the few popular models for women. So without further ado, let's take a look at the current tank models available from the factory and see what they are really like. Dial front view View of the dial in natural light Under lighting View In fact, in terms of appearance alone, both factories have done such an excellent job that they have reached the point where it is hard to tell the real thing from the fake. At least when I compared the three watches side-by-side with their straps removed (I mixed up the three watches), I couldn't quickly tell which one was the GEN by the colour of the dial and the overall appearance, and that was my honest opinion. So which factory do you think is better? Side view of the Crystal The mirror edges of the GEN are chamfered, the horizontal side is very well finished by both factories, very close to the GEN, but the vertical side is a little different. View of dail font stick In fact, there is no difference between the two factories when you simply look at them with the naked eye, and it is easy to see from the macro photos in high definition that the K11's scales are not full enough, and there is hardly any sense of dimensionality. In addition, the overall neatness and the placement of the strokes are relatively better in AF. View of minute scale In the printing process of the scale of the few minutes, AF is also better. The edge of the scale line of K11 is not regular, and the spill over is more worse. On the thicker minute scales such as 5 and 10, the K11 has an obvious stroke, the white lines are visible in the picture, and I think K11 has done this to compensate for the lack of dimensionality in the scale. View of dial oil font The oil font on the dial is still better done by AF, although it is less full than GEN, but at least it has a certain sense of dimensionality, while K11 has none at all, and the colour of the letters is uneven, but it is not obvious to the naked eye. View of hands The colour of the hands of both factories is very close to that of the GEN, but it is not always the same, as there is a colour difference. The blue colour of both factories is brighter than that of the GEN when viewed from a down light perspective. View of hands central It is easy to see from the pictures that the centre of the K11 is not the same height as the GEN, which is slightly higher than the minute hand, while the K11 sinks very significantly, although the AF is in line with the GEN. In addition to this, I also noticed a problem with the K11 by comparing it side by side, the rounded part of the hand is also slightly smaller compared to the GEN. As for the AF, it's also not that perfect, the hands seem slightly thicker when viewed from the side, and that's just from the similarity aspect, actually, a thicker pointer is not a bad thing, what do you think? Side view of the crown There is no significant difference in the shape of the crown between the two factories compared to the GEN But the main difference is the brightness of the blue spinel, which is lacking in both factories, Comparatively speaking, the AF is brighter than the K11. Side view of the case As for the shape of the sides of the case, both factories are very good, and as for the nuances of the case diameters, you can see the comparative view of the data at the end of this article. We can also see the screw holes on the side of the K11, which are a little smaller. The AF is the same as the GEN, and the screw slots are very flat and clean. View of back case In the first picture we can notice that the width of the beveled edge of the rear bottom cover of the K11 is noticeably narrower, the AF is slightly wider but at least it is within acceptable limits In terms of the depth of the engraving, there is not much difference between the two factories. Detail of the strap The genuine product has a calfskin leather strap (with quick release), which doesn't feel particularly good in the hand. Just to clarify, as we purchased a second-hand GEN, we are not sure if the strap is original. Both the AF and the K11 have synchronised GEN straps, but the AF strap is a little thicker than the K11. View of the movement The great thing about quartz models is that there is no worry about errors and there are virtually no after sales problems. So if it's a gift for your wife or a girlfriend, the quartz feminine model is definitely the first choice. The AF and the K11 are both Swiss quartz movements, with different models, but there is no real difference, as they are both electronic anyway. Although the movement is not visible in the case of the solid case back model, the K11 is to be commended for its internal slotted construction Which was made in parallel with the GEN, this is a very careful approach, while AF has omitted the reproduction of the internal structure, but this does not affect the overall similarity. Data comparison chart Well, today's post is here, thank you guys for watching. If there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to complete it. Welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replica watches and GEN’s. And it is also for you to choose the favorite models conveniently. Illustration: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the light source. For details, please refer to the content. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large, you can download it and enlarge it for comparison. There is no perfect replica, only the one you prefer. Thanks. Steve.

Hello everyone, this is Steve. Today we bring you a full comparison of the GEN Blue datejust 126334 with several major manufacturers! Let's get right to it! Front view There is unavoidable about the color difference in the blue dial, the GEN is a dark blue, the AR factory deviates the most and looks similar to a faded color! AR sunburst on the dial is too strong, VS is the closest to GEN, followed by CLEAN, GM is too indistinct! Bezel view VS, CLEAN and AR are all very good in the teeth shape, GM is on the long side and the angle of the triangle on the inner edge is obviously too small! Also the triangle of the AR is too smooth. Markers view The overall shape of the VS is closer to the GEN, VS is better filled, the downside is the lack of rounding of the sharp edges, the other three are still mainly due to the lack of filling of the inner edges, resulting in significant gaps. Clean's chamfering of the scales is still excellent. Crown side view It’s not very good to compare because the angle of the picture will deviate. But after I repeatedly observed the physical comparison, the four factories are actually similar, all still good, or maybe my eyes are not very good! I'll have to see what you guys have to say! Lume filling view All three are very good, except for the GM, which is too smooth, and the AR is the grainiest, for the C, which is the closest in color and texture to the GEN! Engraving font view The VS and Clean are very flat, the GM and AR font have uneven edges, especially the AR! As we can see, GEN's type is very glossy, something that all the factories lack! We noticed through the macro lens that GEN's ink printing is much fuller, but if you look at it from the naked eye, other factories do a good job, except AR, which can be noticeably different Hand view The shape of the central axis of the hands, VS factory and C factory have done skeletonized solid structure, but C factory's central sleeve position, flatness is very poor, GM and AR's sleeve position is completely closed, and is very different from GEN. From the side view, the whole arrangement of VS and GM is very close to GEN, AR appears too dense. Crystal Giant Side View The overall translucency of all the factories is fine, and the cross-sectional chamfers of the windows are best polished by the AR factory! 1-31 calendar display view There's nothing much to say about this! You can compare for yourself if you want to. Rehaut view The GM factory engraving has some darkening and looks a bit like rust; for the AR factory, the engraving looks a bit too light in person, both VS and Clean are still quite good Case side view All the factories are fine in terms of case type, and there are no significant differences! Sel view First, we can check the location of arrow pointed, the layered VS on the side of the bezel is the closest to the GEN, which is commendable, followed by the AR, which is less pronounced in the C factory, and the GM, which is almost flat. Then where the lugs meet the headstock, VS and GEN are the same, GM is not too bad, VS and AR are almost flat. Strap view The VS and CLEAN both use AR steel straps, but the GM steel strap does feel a little different than the AR! The engraving is still a far cry from the GEN. Case back view The same old problem as in the C factory, a ring around the bottom of the teeth, spillover from the brushed lines, unevenness! Lume view The stripes on the bezel are very strong for VS, weaker for C, and almost non-existent for GM and AR. Laser view GEN's irregularly arranged crown pattern is always a problem for factories! And we don’t need to be too concerned! Comparative chart of various data Note: All measurements are taken in a calibrated state and may be inaccurate due to slight deviations in caliper position All the replicas haven't take off the plastic protector. the VS and GM have removed the steel strap protector as you can see, the GM is closest in weight to the GEN ! Well, that's it for today's post, thanks for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me, welcome to comment and exchange! We will bring you more detailed comparisons between the replicas and GEN later, also to let you better choose your favorite style replicas, you can leave a comment on what style you are more interested in! Description: (Some of the photos have deviated from the real thing because of the light source, the details are still based on the text, the size of the comparison pictures are relatively large, you can download them and enlarge them for comparison.) Thanks Steve

Due to the impact of the raid, vs factory is currently slow to ship, need to pre-order, please contact our whatsapp or email to confirm the inventory

Hello everyone, this is Steve and I'm back. The 36mm datejust series was always competed by the old factories GM and EW before, Since the second half of last year, as the two top factories VS and Clean joined the 36mm datejust camp, you guys has more choice in this series. Many friends left a message "I want to see the comparison of 36mm datejust", so the time is coming, let's take a look at the standards of VS and Clean as latecomers, will GM and EW be able to keep the position of the datejust 36mm series? Without further ado, let's get started. Front Dial View Natual Light View Light View In terms of dial color, compared with GEN, VS, CLEAN, and EW have better control, and the color is only slightly darker, while GM has the largest color deviation with obvious brown tone. In addition, the sunburst of GEN is very obvious, while VS and CLEAN is slightly lack of sunburst, and the sunburst of GM and EW is more obvious. Crystal Side View In terms of the edge chamfering of the crystal, the chamfering thickness of GM is the closest to GEN, while Clean and EW are slightly thicker. VS did not process this step. Bezel Side View There is no obvious difference in the surface shape of the fluted bezel between factories by the naked eyes. However, they differ in color. The GEN has a platinum bezel, so it has a distinct yellow hue. The Clean and EW are plated with platinum, which also has a yellow tint. VS and GM ignored this step, so it is silvery white. Crown and 9 o’clock Stick View Factories are almost the same in Crown’s shape, and the edge chamfering is more obvious of Clean. For the stick at 9 o’clock, VS and Clean have obvious flaws, as everyone commented on the “mini version of the 9 o’clock stick”, this stick of the two factories are obviously longer and narrower. In terms of shape and size, GM and EW are obviously closer to GEN. The slight disadvantage is that there is no edge chamfered treatment of EW, while GM is only chamfered the front of stick, but not chamfered the side. Mimeograph Markers Front View The black part of the mimeograph stick, factories has a good three-dimensional effect. In the green outline part, the colors of VS and CLEAN are closest to GEN, GM is darker, and EW is too bright. The difference is not obvious by naked eyes in reality. When you zoom in the picture, you can see that there are more or less flaws in the replica, which cannot compare with the smoothness of GEN. Hands Front View The luminous hands of the factories also have a certain graininess. For the sides of the hands, GEN is very clean, but the factories have some burrs. Painting Font View Considering factors such as font shape, fullness, and regularity, we can see that the mimeographs made by the four factories performed very well. Middle Axis View For middle axis, Clean is the most similar shape with GEN, if the solid axis of Clean is raised a little more, it can be said to be almost exactly the same with GEN. In contrast, the other three factories are slightly different. The treatment of VSF is very neat, while there are obvious weld marks on the middle axis of GM and EW. Rehaut Side View Although the factories are different in engraving of rehaut, it is difficult to see the difference by naked eyes. The serial number of GM appears to be slightly thinner. Calender Window View For calender window, there are blue light coating of the three factories except for the GM. In terms of shape, there is no big difference of the four factories. Case Side View For the shape of the case side, you guys could compare them directly if interested in. SEL View We can see from the first picture, for the truncation surface layers of bezel edge, VS is the closest to GEN (GEN has three layers) While the other three factories only have the same side layers as GEN, and did not show the bottom layering. In terms of the junction of the strap and the lugs, all factories are basically consistent with the GEN factory in the height of protrusion. Caseback View Bracelet Details View In general, Clean and VS do better in the engraving inside the buckle. They perform well, both in terms of shape and depth. GM and EW is slightly insufficient in this part. Laser Mark and Lume View For laser marker, although the shape of EW is not exactly same as GEN, it is the closest to GEN, especially the whole shape looks like a messy arrangement. We can zoom in the luminous picture and check the luminous effect carefully. The graininess of replicas is very clear. Data Comparison View (Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper. All protective films on steel strap of replicas are not torn off.) Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange! I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas. (Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.) By the way, I’d like to share the recent market situation. Due to the uncertain delivery time of some factories, the overall delivery time has also increased compared to previous. We will try to mitigate this situation by adding as much inventory as possible.If some friends are really unwilling to wait for the order, please feel free to tell us, I will arrange a refund for you or change to other model. We will do our best to provide the high quality service to you. There is no perfect replica, only your favorite replica. Thanks Steve.

In actual VS factory return repair rate is much lower, comprehensive consideration more recommended VS factory