bres3000

Turned out to be an empty promise.... as alcohol is metabolized, "courage" vanishes.

I'm afraid its much worse than that.

OR...... the law enforcement agency that seized it is moving it onto one of their own servers.

what WHAT?

The googlefight Judges have scored each of our Matches this evening, and we are ready to announce the Winner of each Match: LINK: docblackrock vs rbj69 LINK: HighDef vs rbj69

And, now.... glade places the blame for the months and months of no communication from him square on the shoulders of Matrix. "I left him (Matrix) in charge... he was supposed to do this, he was supposed to do that... but, he didn't do it." I have news for glade.... I held a private secret raffle and he won; his prize is he gets to KISS MY ASS.

Or, you could buy the Rep of this Rep and save approx. $200?

You mean like, "we must meet for hugs & drinks?"

#1 - Based upon a PM I received and the fact that my post was deleted, I would maintain it is not allowed. #2 - I have not mistaken anything for anything else - it was a metaphor. But I really appreciate you trying to tell me what I was thinking

As a side note, it is interesting that RWG's estranged cousin site, The Dark Side, is having some First Amendment "issues." The topic being discussed here is not allowed over there. hmmm....

Grrrrrrrrr. It was YOU? I thought it was Gran. "Someone" had to restore a back-up database that was just a tad "old" - that's why you saw no 06'ers and why Gran is/was still a Mod, which he isn't, so he can't. Clear as mud?

Did anyone else get one of these?? {Edited my IP OUT]

Bingo.

I assume that's U.S. Law and not International Law? Perhaps U.K. Law has an applicable Statute?

heheheheh I was thinking www.The Zigmeisterisresponsibleformyactions.com

"Ass kissers" is the expression that I would use, Doc. You've been screwed on so many levels.... And, you didn't even get kissed first. You know, its a hell of an idea for a scam, though..... I think I'll set up a website and basically warehouse people's stuff indefinitely, and when they want it back, I'll charge them a hefty fee. What should I name it?

I don't give a rats ass whether you think my information is correct or not - it came right off of the Moneybooger's Invoice. And you presume to tell ME how & when to post here? Don't give me your crasy [censored], or I'll have my boys run over your ass with a tank.

Personally, if it cost $200 or more, I'd fuss about the date. Less than $199, I wouldn't.

What to you reccommend that I apply to my straps to clean & protect them? (I want something that won't darken the leather.) thanks

Base Price: $219 "Adjusted Total" by Moneyboogers: $235.43 That's 7.5%, I'm pretty sure. Maybe it varies according to location?

I think you hit the nail on the head! I was about to pull the trigger on something of his, pre-sale, but four things stopped me: Moneyboogers - 7.5% fee. Western UNion - 12.5% fee. Bank charges of $25 - $75 for Wire Transfer. (I didn't bother to find out which one applied to me.) Paul e-mailed me that his 10% off "ended last weekend" but his Ad says "No more 10% discount after June 1th." I don't know what I was thinkin' anyway. Josh, Andrew - forgive me.

ahhhh..... there's that old voice of unwavering self-control with which you once moderated on rwgI - NOT. but, don't panic - you can buy more booze tomorrow. how GAY is that?

King has had this watch for some time now, but it has its share of "issues." (Like the markers on the bezel, for example.) On the plus side, you could keep your arms and legs if you bought from King and not Honpo! LINK: King's Slytech Submersible Chrono

I subscribe to a couple on-line market research deals and occasionally I take the time to take part in one of their surveys. Anyway, yesterday in the subject line of one of their emails I read: "A Survey about Watches" So, I had to make a choice; click on Delete or click on the Link? What? OF COURSE I clicked on the Link! The first "question" listed several Price Range groupings - $100 - $200, $200 - $300, etc. To the side were boxes to check either "Would consider buying" or "Would NOT consider buying." I think I started saying "would NOT" at $2,000 The second "question" listed several Watch Brands and asked if I had or had not heard of them. From what I remember, they listed Baume & Mercier, Breitling, Cartier, Movado, Omega, Raymond Weil, Rolex, Tag Heuer... I dunno, maybe Longines too. (But NO Panerai!) So I checked them all and went to the next question. So, there's an Ad like you'd see on a whole page in a magazine and it has Tiger Woods on the left, kind of in the shadows and on the right foreground is some Tag Heuer chronograph. I hate Tag's so I have no idea what model it was. I can't even remember what the caption said. Now there are questions about how the Ad "made me feel" about the product. Yeah, right. Did I mention that I hate Tag's? Well, I blasted through marking the most negative answer possible on all the questions. And THEN.... it says "View the Ad again, and then tell us what the Ad 'says' to you." HOT DOG - my editorial license has arrived! To paraphrase, I said that the Ad "said" to me that "if I don't mind owning a crappy watch, I should buy this watch so I can join the Corps of Assholes of which Tiger Woods is the president." And that's about it. No questions about Reps. But they DID ask: "Who is co0L3r, Slay or x2crazy4shadyx?" I said they were equally cool.