Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

edgematic1

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    939

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Posts posted by edgematic1

  3. New Barrichello Mod Cote de Geneve by domi

    in The Audemars Piguet Area

    Posted

    To be fully honest, I am very dissapointed with Domi his behaviour. I have pointed out multiple times that his CDG is totally wrong. I even sent him a message on whatsapp about this matter.

    I told him the correct angle, width and colour plating. It has to be rhodium, not silver. I even offered my help in plating them.

    All of the help above was ignored. It seems he knows best.

    I'm sorry, it looks ok but it's completely wrong and it was probably an expensive mod. I feel if you go this far in modding and spending much money that it should be perfect.

     

    Also posted this on repgeek:

     

    I have used the pictures provided by Domi and added some lines on them in Autocad. I scaled and rotated each image to the correct gen dial size and added the lines.

    The angle is about 42° and distance between the lines is about 1.35mm.

    This should help. I also added some pictures of an already modded AP ROO RBII with correct to gen spec CDG.

    I hope this helps.

    It's also important to drill out the screw holes to a correct diameter. Also, Rhodium plating will give the best results instead of silver plating, see the pics below.

    CDG_zps4a101ea9.jpg

    cdg9_zps43cbbf05.jpg

    cdg7_zpsdc3529ef.jpg

    cdg8_zps20051ed7.jpg

    cdg6_zpsdaf98273.jpg

    cdg5_zps479382b6.jpg

    • Like 1

  12. AP ROO Carbon Diver V3 on eBay!

    in The Audemars Piguet Area

  21. Audemars Piguet 15400 datewheel mod! With pics.

    in The Audemars Piguet Area

    Posted

    Hey guys,

    Since the first day I got my Angus 15400 I was really impressed by the quality of it. I simply love it and now I'm thinking about getting a gen RO. Anyhow, what annoyed me was the ugly datewheel. The date was too thick and completely misaligned. As you guys might know I have a custom datewheel and I fitted it in the watch. Now it looks amazing :).

    Some pics:

    null_zps5df209b6.jpg

    null_zps26fb4180.jpg

    The paint has a reflection, hard to catch... hence the bad picture:
    null_zpsa6284d6c.jpg

    null_zps32a7839b.jpg

    closer look:

    null_zps83adda86.jpg

    Yesterday I met up with Vincent007, he was on the fence... ;)

    null_zpsddbe2398.jpg

     

  23. Mikeymike pictorial review "Trustytime AP carbon forged diver (H-fac)"

    in The Audemars Piguet Area

    Posted

    Amazing pics, sure is a beautiful watch! :)

     

    How about the movement? I have heard rumours of a lower quality clone being used, some kind of new movement? Has anyone taken a good look inside one of these beasties?

     

    I opened it up but I'm not a knowledgable guy about movements. I heard the same about the movement that it would be inferior. I did not see any ETA stamps at all though (as far as the Asian ETA has got stamps...). It's running good imo. Someone who can tell from my pic? (see my review) I have another pic on my phone as well if it could help... :)

     

    I'm happy about the movement as of now.

  24. Audemars Piguet Carbon Diver Cartel/H-fax Photo - Review

    in The Audemars Piguet Area

    Posted

    Hey guys,

    As you all might know I’m an avid fan of AP. I love the whole brand image and almost every design going from watches up to the fountain pens and loupes they offer.
    With the forged carbon watches out there everybody on here that likes AP lusted for forged carbon, our first hero was Imaknockov producing his carbon cases, not forged though.
    The forging process is something that just can’t be done at home, unless you have quite a good sum in your bank account to spend on mechanical advance toys.
    Anyway, fast forward, we’re 2013 and 2-3 makers have been working on the carbon thing. First we had Angus with his “wood” diver. Nice but it not like gen. I liked it though.
    Then all of a sudden the cartel came up with a good story and pics. Two of the pics they posted were these, remember it well during my review:

    26-08-201319-52-04_zps88cfae48.jpg


    DSC_5779_zps33aa8aeb.jpg



    When I saw that I just know I had to order, especially since they would deliver quite soon. My fairytale started… Payment sent on the 24th of April.
    We all know the sh*t that happened so I’ll skip that part up to now. I received my diver as of today! The 26th of August.
    So let me start my official review. Sorry for all the talk, I have not posted a lot lately so here you go.

    In 1993, 21 years after the introduction of the Royal Oak, Audemars Piguet introduced the Royal Oak Offshore. It was time for an evolution regarding the Royal Oak collection, to make it more rugged, more sporty and – perhaps – younger. The Offshore is the most popular Audemars Piguet collection without a doubt. Some purists though, might prefer the ‘normal’ Royal Oak collection as it is more or less an understatement, and yes, closer to the original design of 1972.
    History aside, I assume you know most of the stuff already in the whole rep world. Today I had the opportunity to have a closer look at the Royal Oak Offshore Diver made out of so called forged carbon. The Offshore collection is pioneering with exotic materials ever since the very first models and forged carbon is one of them. In 2007, Audemars Piguet used forged carbon for the very first time with their Royal Oak Offshore Alinghi Team model. A few years ago, the Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph ‘Bumblebee’ was also made out of forged carbon and was extremely popular.

    This time, Audemars Piguet used the popular Royal Oak Offshore Diver (ref.15703, we reviewed it here) as a basis and transformed it into this forged carbon version, ref. 15706AU. The introduction took place during SIHH 2012 but was over snowed with the introduction of the new ‘Jumbo’ ref.15202 watch and offcourse the 40th anniversary of of the model. The Carbon Diver basically used the DNA of the Bumblebee.

    DSC_5915_zpse96d4e88.jpg



    One of the things that immediately comes to mind is the clever use of scratch resistant (black) ceramic for its bezel. Everyone has his share of dents in his own AP. Because the Offshore case is bigger and thicker, it is easier to bump into something with it.

    DSC_5890_zpsd9849042.jpg


    There is no transparent caseback. Just the ‘Royal Oak Offshore’ engraving we’ve seen on the previous Diver models and other Offshore models as well. The watch is fitted with an A2824 movement.

    DSC_5828_zps9bc5aaca.jpg


    IMG_8482_zps2f43450a.jpg

    DSC_5796_zpsc180c92d.jpg

    DSC_5797_zps276c40bf.jpg



    The dial

    The dial features a black “Mega tapisserie” pattern the whole Offshore line uses. In my opinion, comparing this to the gen piece, the tapisserie pattern is too small. The circular engravings on the main dial plate are not enough pronounced and the dial does not look glossy enough compared to the gen dial. This might be due to the crystal though.

    DSC_5850_zpsa01464fc.jpg


    DSC_5852_zps559388a0.jpg

    DSC_5880_zps2e4f9c0c.jpg

    DSC_5895_zps198dd510.jpg

    DSC_5899_zps98e2d0bc.jpg

    DSC_5804_zps8092d61a.jpg

    DSC_5784_zpsef259383.jpg



    The inner rotating [censored] is predominantly black with the exception of the first 15 minutes which are depicted in yellow. Here, minutes are marked with black minute integers and white strokes every five minutes. Elsewhere Arabic numerals in a modern font are marked, “20”, “30”, “40” and “50”. At noon a triangular index is used. The makers quite nailed the [censored] ring layout, it’s a good job, the yellow looks amazing and correct. One thing that bothers me a bit is the colour of the lume. It’s a bit different from my dial markers. It would have been nice if it would have been pure white. The rotating mechanism feels solid and good, be sure to check yours when you receive it as there already is a member who reported a problem with that. It feels that solid that I was a bit scary I would break a thing or I would jam it. Luckily it did not.

    The dial uses clean applied batons to indicate each hour and at noon double batons are used. The presentation of the batons and numerals is wonderfully legible, everyone will like this. Lume is as good as the gen but nothing compared to a pam or a gen omega planet ocean.

    The date is located at 3 o’clock. The maximum depth is shown towards the base of the dial near 6 o’clock, an impressive 300 metres. The date is magnified by using a loupe/cyclops. This was the first big disappointment I encountered when I took out the piece of the plastic. The cyclops s*cks big time, it really does. The first thing that came to my mind was the cyclops of BC (BigCrown) that just looked like a mirror. It does seem to have some AR but it looks often blue. Not like the early V3 diver blue though. It’s not a smurf.

    The minute hand is provided by the vivid yellow colour which matches the hue of the diving scale of the aforementioned rotating [censored]. The second hand is black, tipped with yellow, repeating the colour scheme of the watch. This all looks great and looks like gen in my eyes.

    The crystal on this piece is my second disappointment. It does not look like the gen nor like the diver V3/3.5/4.1 which did look like gen. I don’t know what went wrong here but either it has no AR or very bad AR. I hope they correct this on their next version as it’s a big let down for me.

    DSC_5906_zps3ced7161.jpg


    DSC_5902_zps3d0a53bc.jpg

    DSC_5877_zps1f9a25be.jpg

    DSC_5875_zps61ccb1ed.jpg

    DSC_5907_zpsfd8c3e99.jpg

    DSC_5908_zpsed873cad.jpg


    The case

    The “forged” carbon bestows a totally different character to the watch when contrasted with the steel case version. It exhibits marvellous modernity and the marble-like pattern to its surface proffers a unique aesthetic. One thing that I’m not sure of is if they used the same case maker as the first sample cases I mentioned on my introduction above (the pics you had to remember). If I look at the carbon pattern on those pics it looks forged indeed and perfect as per gen.

    However, having the piece in my hands now it looks more like the case Zorrolondon once made. Which is not “forged” at all. A great way of manufacturing but not the gen way. This is an assumption that I made, not a fact. But this might be a reason of postponing the release. The case looks good but in my eyes not as per gen. Finishing looks ok, the gen has a satin kind of finish, very nice. The rep is somewhat in the middle but very good too. I can’t complain.
    VS my forged carbon project:

    DSC_5918_zpsaf7a9113.jpg


    DSC_5917_zps574a3379.jpg

    DSC_5916_zps53ab8e33.jpg

    DSC_5868_zps107e7c82.jpg

    DSC_5863_zpsf3bbcbaf.jpg

    DSC_5860_zps622b3c7d.jpg

    DSC_5858_zps96e890e8.jpg



    This shows the look, the shine:

    DSC_5836_zpsadd89ec1.jpg


    DSC_5835_zps7d20e945.jpg



    The octagonal shaped bezel features eight screws with chamfered slots all perfectly aligned to follow the form of the dial. The bezel really looks amazing and 1:1. But so does the other carbon bezel from Angus. They both look great and they both nailed it on that.

    The union of the rubber strap to the case is faithful to original Royal Oak design. The absence of conventional lugs further differentiates the watch and imparts a neoteric character despite 40 years elapsing since its original conception. The strap feels soft and is very flexible, it has some kind of a gummy feel, a sticky feel. I like it though I prefer the gen strap or the strap from the V3/3.5/4.1. This is something I’m gonna replace. The logo is well stamped on the strap. A thing to mention is the strap colour, which is a bit too light. This is only noticeable side by side. The main difference is the feel. The buckle looks good but when taking a closer look we notice that the AP logo is somewhat wrong. The engraving ain’t 1:1. Still it looks good but I’m ought to give you a critical review, which is imo the purpose of it.

    DSC_5827_zps655ce937.jpg


    DSC_5826_zps0c4fae2f.jpg

    DSC_5818_zpsf2faff0d.jpg



    The caseback of the movement is another part where it lacks something. The engraving ain’t great, the Royal Oak Offshore logo is completely wrong and way too flat. The sandblasted grain could have been much better. What they did do very good is the SN number and H XXXXX code. The font is great and better than the diver V3/3.5./4.1. The caseback from Angus his FC is better.
    The crown of this piece was another disappointment. It looks not centered and badly engraved. Angus his version is better.

    DSC_5792_zps878878cb.jpg



    The movement

    This piece comes with the A2824 movement. Not much grease on the O-ring, it felt dry:

    DSC_5919_zps3a649e7d.jpg


    DSC_5920_zps83b10a50.jpg

    DSC_5921_zps6ce81817.jpg

    DSC_5922_zps5fa524e5.jpg



    Conclusion

    Well, after a wait of about 4 months I’m disappointed with their 1:1 diver. Don’t get me wrong, I do like it a lot but the marketing and the hype around it is wrong. This piece ain’t the rep of 2013 if that is what you are hoping for. It’s a great rep but the SS version is just way better repped. The build structure is 1:1 as per gen indeed. Basically if you want this version to be closer as per gen this is what you should do:

    -    Get a noob dial and Cyclops (V3 – 3.5 – 4.1) and replace it with the H fac
    -    Get a noob movement, imo their datewheel is a bit better (if you are really really picky)
    -    Get an Angus FC Diver caseback and crown
    -    Get a noob crystal (if they fit the ceramic bezel)
    -    Mod the movement to low beat
    -    Get the noob strap

    That’s about it. I hope this has been helpful for everyone that is on the fence. And if you ask me which one I prefer, SS or FC then I say SS as it’s more versatile, classy. The FC is a true sports watch, but I like it a lot as well. Heck, it’s an AP… 

    This is the first order from the cartel and definitely my last order. Everyone might be happy with the watch but I think further than that alone. I won’t forget the customer service regarding this release and updates they gave us. This is a fairytale but the ending ain’t that great imo. I will however enjoy this piece, I hope you guys do to!

    Thanks for reading.

    *None of the pics have been edited!

    MOVIE:

    th_DSC_5896_zps8c4a7a2a.jpg


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Overall impression:
    •    Good value for the money but the SS is much better value for money
    •    Good quality/finish compared to the genuine article
    •    Nitpickers, count in mods as mentioned above, main problem is crystal and cyclops which are real sh*t

    FLAWS (guys, you should know that I am a real pain in the *ss nitpicker, most of these flaws can only be seen up close):

    •    Lume should match better (colour wise)
    •    Dial ain’t that great vs gen dial, the tapisserie looks too small and concentric circles are not enough pronounced, it’s not shiny enough too
    •    Bad crystal regarding AR
    •    Bad cyclops regarding AR
    •    Caseback could have been better
    •    Crown is bad, uncentered engraving and bad engraving
    •    Strap is too soft, gummy, sticky vs gen but doesn’t feel bad

    Problems on mine:
    Dial was unevenly placed, I already corrected this and my datewheel is f*cked, it’s not centered. This will get fixed as I will get a noob diver and use that dial/movement. There was also dust on my dial.


    Thanks for viewing my thread. Please feel free to post your AP Carbon Diver pics and impressions!
    MORE PICS TO COME! NOW IT'S DINNER TIME! :)

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up