The naming conventions used in china don't mean anything here, and with the amount of traffic this thread and LWL thread received, everyone knows it. This ridiculous naming should end. Maybe when dealing with chinese customers and suppliers you need to use or understand these naming conventions, but when you post on your english language website that something is what it is not, you should be made aware of it. Because now you are even doing it when it doesn't mean a higher priced item. I give the following examples "New for March":
http://watchwindersworld.com/omse10031-pla...0bp-p-2469.html
And Trusty has it for the same price, but showed it openned, but only with the anti-magnetic cover in place, hiding the movement:
http://www.ttwristwatch.com/index.php?main...roducts_id=1202
Now for a little analysis
"Asia ETA 2824-2 28,800bp"
Asia - Well this part is true. This movement is definately made in asia.
ETA - A swiss company having nothing to do with this movement. Include design, build or even inspiration.
2824-2 - A specific movement model number made by the aforementioned swiss company
28,800bp - True again
This movement is the DG 2813-2S. It's design is based on the 8215 movement manufactured by Miyota, but the beat has been increased to 28.8 and it is 22 jewels instead of 21. I'm not saying anything about the quality of the movement, but it has nothing to do with ETA whatsoever. When in it's earlier incarnation, you guys simple called it an asia 21j movement. You could even call it an asian 28.8 miyota copy. Clone has too much of a different meaning. BTW, isn't this the same movement from the B&R that was an asia 2892 clone?