bronica

Hey Cavi, I think you are getting confused with what i am saying and what the rules are. I have read the entire thread, the mods called you out on the tag because it was wrong, you did not have the year. That is why it was put on hold. If you read the rules, you do not need to have 'RWI' on the tag, that was not the issue. They did not say anything about the confusion of the 2013/2015, only some members did and other member then stood up for you. It seems your issue is more so with the members calling you out in the thread and jumping to conclusions and admittedly that does suck, but you're gonna find those people in any fora unfortunately.

Okay? You know i'm not actually telling you to go to Vegas, or saying you're a gambler right? You keep grasping at straws to salvage some form of a comeback it's quite sad. I never once insulted you so i've no idea where all this "dark hole, hall monitor, numbskull" stuff is coming from but it just shows the sort of personality you have. My input is actually quite useful in fact. You made this thread for some way to vent or gain support and input, when a lot of the people supporting you are the people who did not read the rules just like you, and blaming it on RWI. The other half are people telling you suck it up and rules are rules, which you can't apparently read. Do you realise how many people have successfully made threads and sold their items without a problem? You are an iota in that pool. You abused selling thinking it was a right, and not as a privilege and your own self-entitlement landed you in the brig. You'll probably come back with a string of insults that have no relation or connection to me. I'll look forward to reading it and seeing how you vent your own frustration out on me but you won't be worth replying to again. Thanks for the enjoyment buddy. P.S. To quote you from RWI: Juxtaposed by your reply to me an hour ago: Enjoy 8th grade!

Stay out of Vegas mate, you're a terrible gambler On the contrary, it's very much on topic. As said previously "This is a fine example of how people don't read rules, and then blame the institution for their own mistakes." Sounds like your situation, no?

No they didn't. It is because you incorrectly tagged your sale by not having the year. There is no rule stating you have to have RWI on the tag. And to clarify, NONE of the mods called you out afterwards on the year. This is a fine example of how people don't read rules, and then blame the institution for their own mistakes.

Looking to buy this from another member but he is unsure whether it is Asian or Swiss, all parts look new so i am leaning towards Asian.

Sorry didn't see this. I'm getting the Rolex Air-King. I have seen a TD sell one with ' Swiss Automatic ETA-2836-2' for 205 and another TD sell one with 'Asia Copy ETA 2836-2 Automatic 28800BPH' for 198. It's mostly the price variances that have my head all over the board and scrambling my buying decisions.

So essentially if i'm looking at a watch on a website around the $200 mark (i am taking this price only in reference to what i am buying, not all watches) i won't know if it is a used or new ETA? After all my reading i didn't even know used ETA's were installed in watches..

He did mention that the $208 Swiss ETA is used. Are the general amount of watches around the $200 mark with Swiss ETA installed used?

I'm getting an Air-King soon and a TD gave me a quote for 208 for a used Swiss ETA and 328 for a brand new ETA. Is it really worth the extra $120 for the brand new one? Not only that, they offered me 198 for the Asian ETA 28800bph. I've done a lot of searching but have had no clear arguments on whether it is better to get it brand new or not, do you guys have any opinions or experiences? I'm still a bit new at this and i didn't even know that they sold reps with used ETAs, and considering that it is around the 200~ mark, is it safe to assume the majority of reps from all the TD websites are fixed with used ETA reps? (This of course considering they are around that price mark) You get what you pay for, right?