This is the pits, when people do this they are only thinking of themselves and before anyone jumps up and accuse me of just sticking up for Neil, I'm not, I'm sticking up for the dealers..........Why?.........Because without them we wouldn't be able to enjoy our little hobby.
From the time I arrived at these boards I have know that of all the ways to settle a dispute with a dealer chargeback isn't one of them and for someone to use this method they are really stating that they don't give a stuff about the rest of us.
I tried hard to get people not to use chargeback against Paul after the infamous Crazy Sale, not because I was a big fan of Paul's but because the best chance everyone had to receive their watch was for Paul not to have his PP account frozen.
At the time Paul stated that anyone who did a chargeback would lose their money, yet recently soneone posted on another board complaining that he lost his money after the Crazy Sale but he also freely admits doing a chargeback..................makes you wonder.
I know I'll receive a lot of flack over this because many of you see chargeback as a legitimate avenue for dealer dispute settlement, but stop and think, now it's Neils turn to be hit..........a number of other dealers have already been given the once over and the outcome is that soon we will need to use other methods of payment which will not be as ideal to us as PP was, and will most likely lack the ability to lodge any form of chargeback anyway, so our hobby would in fact have taken a step backwards just to accomendate a few greedy individuals.
Ken