-
Posts
414 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Posts posted by QueTip
-
-
It’s an April’s fool.
-
7 minutes ago, Legend said:
Case in point:
This is my AP 15500. And a good and true representation of the Audemars Piguet 15500.
Now if I want to ask if it’s the most beautiful watch in the world, I can use this pic and not some defiled version of the watch to get an opinion.
The way I see it, YOU owe all of us AP guys (@quetip,[mention=74693]blackboxes[/mention] etc) an apology for posting a throw-away, rep of a canal st rep, deformed Quasimodo of a watch, calling it a “15202” and trying to get an opinion of its aesthetic appeal based on it. If you are showing enough disrespect to the brand and one of its popular Royal Oak models to do that, then you’re either being sarcastic, ignorant or plain antagonistic, none of which deserves any form of courtesy.
Do not push your luck further. This can either end here and now or you can go on to make a bigger fool of yourself.
If you had posted a breitling I would not have cared less. But don’t insult the brand by posting an ugly cheap rep and using it to represent the 15202. #disrespectful
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#diswristpectful*
- 1
-
On 5/30/2019 at 7:43 PM, Tgwatchgg said:
Lol yes I agree I'm 18 I have 500 not 20000
In that case- invest in yourself not in a fake watch to pretend you are something.
-
3 minutes ago, Legend said:
No, I have said nothing wrong and I will NOT apologize. It is you who misconstrued my comments.
Firstly, your title asked if the watch in the subject was the most beautiful watch ever made. And then you posted a pic of a cheap and poorly made rep to represent the watch. It is like asking if Paris is the most beautiful city ever and then presenting a drawing of the city made by a normal 5 year old. You could have picked a much better picture to back up the beautiful watch picture implied in your title, but you chose to use your own pic to represent a beautiful watch.
I am an AP guy, and I know my APs. The watch in your pic has no business being a 15202, much less beautiful.
This is not about trying to pass off a replica as a gen, but rather, simply considering the 15202 a beautiful watch. I consider the 15202 a very beautiful watch, but the watch in your pic is a poor replica of the 15202 and it looks cheap. I will call it as I see it and I will not apologize. Do some research and you will find there are much better representations of the 15202 replica.
What he said. What is represented in the OP has no dog calling itself 15202. Period.
Hello again RWG.
- 1
-
Salut! Bienvenue Ibra.
-
Just now, Sogeha said:
Good god @QueTip surrendered and I didn’t even have to edit his posts or threaten to ban him. Firstly he reveals a health issue, then starts acting out of character, I’m deeply concerned
I'm currently in a therapy session with @Yllekp. Don't you worry, I'll be back to being myself in due time.
-
6 minutes ago, Sogeha said:
I’m a doctor of robotics mate, I don’t do man plumbing.
Hahahahaha, I surrender..... for now
-
1 minute ago, Sogeha said:
Too much detail, we don’t need to know about issues or lack of from your end?
Always wanna keep you on the loop.
-
Just now, Sogeha said:
Where does that leave you? Well I would settle for a Vietnamese dial for the time being.
This. And it'll be a long time.
- 1
-
Rule #1 you don't talk about the Dark Lord.
Rule #2 you can't reach the Dark Lord
Rule #3 don't mention his name 3 times in one post
- 1
-
Chicago
-
I'm not experiencing any issues on my end.
-
-
Squidward
-
Do you guys argue about a misconception of the word ”genstein” or is it something old and personal behind this? Is this dumb and useless to argue about? Yes it is.
But if we are going to throw garbage at each other i do have a few apples i could throw aswell if needed.
The build thread is about the OP’s friend who built a watch which OP is sharing so calling it genstein or frankenstein doesnt make it any better or worse for the OP.
Absolutely it is absolutely stupid to argue about that. I personally have nothing personal behind this, it’s just me stating my opinion.
Both@sacsah1 and myself have said that it is a very nice build indeed. All we did was mention the correct term for the build. -
If I come off like that, then it must be true.
I’m not the one banned for filipping fake [censored] as genuine and
profiterring. So yeah, I’m jealous of him. I want to cheat people off their cash. It’s my mantra when I wake
up in the morning.
Shall we get back to the watch?
If you get a steal deal on a vintage part or watch, let’s say a 6263 PaulNewman for 3k, and you happen to get tired of it and want to flip it. Would you flip it at the price you paid for it or rather sell it for market value? Exactly. You don’t have to tell me, I know the answer already.
The profiteering aspect has already been discussed on here and I’m wondering whether you’ve read that thread or not? If you did, it seems like you did not get the message in that. -
I’m not the least butthurt as IT ISN’T my bloody watch.
Jeebus.
However I’m not the least surprised.
sacsah1, here are your accomplishments:
banned on RWI, tried to pull the same stunts here.
Keyboard-taliban of professional calibre. I’ve made his salea threads very popular around here. Maybe why they aren’t appearing anymore?
https://rwg.cc/topic/189009-fssold-sold-sold-franken-rolex-daytona-116520-one-of-a-kind-panda-dial-gen-4130-movement/
https://rwg.cc/topic/189010-fs-franken-rolex-submariner-16613-one-of-a-kind-gen-18k-parts/
https://rwg.cc/topic/189205-sold-sold-sold-fs-franken-rolex-submariner-hulk-116610lv-gen-dial-insert-bracelet-and-more/
Crawl back to Repgeek, they still drink your Koolaid there...
What’s the deal here? I see nothing wrong in these sale threads. Do you? Please enlighten me if you do so.
Additional to that, if you knew your stuff, you wouldn’t act like you do here. This is just absolutely uncalled for and dumb. You just show pure hate and envy, maybe jealousy? I don’t care about the multiple M’s you manage a year, that doesn’t say anything.
Don’t take this personally yet, this is just how you come off to my eyes. -
I fart in your general direction too...
P.S. Everything aligns 0.05mm. Tubes, pushers, everything is redrilled and case is slimmed from the top, thereforw rehaut is removed.
So a Genenstein according to you uses gen midcase and bracelet too? Then it’s not really a Genenstein, more of a black markert unsellable Rolex.
But sure Sachal your imaginary wiener is bigger.
I have to +1@sacsah1 . A genstein is exactly what he said it was. A watch that was assembled completely out of genuine parts. Even the case and bracelet counts to this. Yours is a Franken and despite the flaws of the ARF case, a very decent one. Although it is not a genstein. Period.
If you get butthurt because people telling you the truth, then so be it, be my guest.- 2
-
rubberb.com lol
-
On 1/23/2018 at 2:17 PM, rails said:
I don’t buy from unconfirmed Reddit sources, hence a legit check. This is listed as v3 while our friend posted that it looks like v2j. So, asking where our friend purchased his... I don’t know about you, consistent nomenclature instills some confidence. And with all these cloned sites out there, you never know
smh
-
33 minutes ago, Yllekp said:
It is a hobby for life
This is very true. Either you live for it or you don't. There's no in-between.
-
-
That’s a damn beauty man! Wear her in good health!
-
2 minutes ago, Raddave said:
isnt it ironic ?
don't ya think?
Show the PAM combo you choose today
in The Panerai Area
Posted
.