QueTip

Glad to be able to get back on here too.  

It's just the countdown that makes me curious..  

Looks amazing. Wear her well! 

@nanuq it could be even worse...

Wow, that looks amazing! 

5 hours ago, altesporsche said:

10 hours ago, QueTip said:

 

Also that movement doesn't look like an SA to me.

 

6 hours ago, misiekped said:

They didn't listed as SA but it look exactly as the SA3135
 

 

5 hours ago, altesporsche said:

On Puretimes site its listed as a new SA3135 for 2017 with better plating etc... and yes as Misiekped said it looks exactly like an SA3135,

Oh snap, I gots to hate Apples spelling function.. Never again. I initially said 'Although, that movement does look like an SA to me.' I don't know what's so hard about that.. Maybe Apple just can't get over my scouser accent.  

1 hour ago, denimhead said:

I'd be interested in some feedback on this as well. Is it just the usual sa3135 with engraved logo and number on the plate? Which version of the LV dial is this? I believe theyres 4 variants

The dial is fantasy Mark. 

As for the movement, I don't think that it's an SA but a simple Miyota or ETA clone with 3135 deco. 

They have the 'SA3135' listed in the title of the watch if it's SA. 

Also that movement doesn't look like an SA to me.

Noob

31 minutes ago, Sogeha said:

QueTip knows, QueTip always knows, once Sacsah agrees I'm going to jump in and say the same thing they do and look terribly clever.

I'm allowing myself to speak for @sacsah1 and say: 'that's a gen!' 

1 minute ago, paristoto said:

Ok, busted.

The entire watch is gen. From bezel, to hands, to box, to warranty card...gen price too. No miracles here.

Sorry for the prank but I felt the urge to post this

I stand corrected... How didn't I see that dial...  

Of course, this is a 116500LN. 

I wasn't completely sure on the bezel, on some pictures it looked kind of funky but on the last one it looked perfect but yet, I still assumed it was aftermarket and just a good angle because the dial confused me for a second.. 

1 hour ago, paristoto said:

 

We went from dead giveaway to probably gen
Should I still upgrade the hands?

 

Lol, go from gen hands to gen hands? 

Nice gen mate.

Only thing not gen on this thing is the bezel. It's a 116520 on an aftermarket black bezel. 

@sacsah1 has the best ceramic Bluesy

@someguyinfrance has the best 5 digit Bluesy

10 hours ago, Legend said:

For the sake of education M can I ask what the flaws are please thanks

I'm feeling free to also list the flaws.. 

Case: the lugs are off, they should be thin and not so thick

Crown: too big

Crown Guards: way to thick and round, for a 16610 they should be small and short also pointy when looked at from the face side

Dial: totally off.. Maxi Markers are incorrect for the LN (only done on the 5 digit LV) and dial print is also a total disaster in terms of font, placement and quality

Hands: also off, they're are too fat, the minute hand is too fat and looks like it could be used for a Maxi Sub dial better than this, also they're stacked on H2 position which is also a flaw. (most high grade ETA based Reps are too but it's a flaw nonetheless)

Insert: odd print and the pearl is not looking good. The surround is too wide and the pearl doesn't look good in general

Bezel Ring: bezel teeth are to shallow and should be deeper. Also the steel 'ring' (the thing that is before the bezel teeth start) that is around the upper side of the insert should also be started earlier

SEL: Shape looks odd, it's too recessed 

Bracelet: looks like solid links whereas the 16610 has hollow mid links. Also the SEL part looks super disgusting from the back. 

Clasp: Totally off, there shouldn't be a nail groove and the coronet is off too, clasp engravings also look ugly

Rehaut: Wrong font, engraving style

Markers: also totally off, mixed Maxi markers with non maxi ones.. (i.e. 6, 9) 

DateWheel: Wrong font, misplaced

There's more to all that, that's just a simple list.  

Gen for reference: 

Heh, can't wait to see it fully mounted.  

EDIT: This is a Mikey's classic DW for LWO and the spots you may see on it are just dust specs.  

As some of you may have heard.. AP brought some very nice pieces to SIHH 2017. .

Here they are: 

On 1/6/2017 at 6:56 PM, droptopman said:

@dbane883, that is a beautiful watch my good friend.  Very rare to see these days.  Congratulations on finding such a great example.

+1

4 hours ago, Legend said:

Moved to the general discussion section as it seems more appropriate.

Oh wait, I didn't do that? ? 

Excuse me, must have been blind again when I posted it lmao 

The left one is gen. 

Really regretting selling this... I'm having a lot of regret moments lately.

38 minutes ago, bbsw@rren said:

BAHAAHAAHAAHAAAAA

+1

2 hours ago, Girln2watches said:

It's DateJust...my phone decides randomly to correct what doesn't need correcting.

I feel your pain.. ducking autocorrect ?

On 12/27/2016 at 5:32 PM, freddy333 said:

The watch is called a DateJust (see dial). If yours says Date Adjust, then it is horribly broken.

LOL! ?

Gusta

If you ask me, don't ask for others opinions but buy what ever watch you like and you can see yourself wearing! 

I know and have seen a LOT of women wearing regular sized watches such as Subs, GMTs, Daytonas and even APs! And let me tell you, on 9 out of 10 of these people these watches looked amazing on them. I have digged out a few pics for you to judge for yourself.  

Anyway, whatever you do, make sure to post it on here! 

Looks great brother! I always told you  

Wear her in good health! I honestly prefer the black on black version over the Panda too. 

17 hours ago, jpohl402 said:

Sooo.....

What *ARE* the specs?!?!

Only been about 6 months.... LOL...

Thanks for sharing with us!

Lol

Luckily these are only rumors for now.

I don't feel that SD4k..

would be something different with a red print and with regular minute tracks..