GShocked

Enjoy it. They're just jealous probably.

Arguably one of the best movements ever made for top grade. Sellita has their chronometer grade movements luckily to give the market a similar movement for us folks that don't have 10-100k to spend on a time piece.

Unless they've changed things, most smart watches only have like 50 meters for resistance. I'll stick to tried and true quartz/solar! "All good points, but the same case can be made for doing away with a wristwatch altogether in favor of a smartphone. Why wear a quartz watch when you already carry a phone that is probably more accurate than your watch (most smart phones routinely auto-correct themselves through your provider)? Of course, the answer is that, for most gentlemen, there is only 1 acceptable way to display style or status & that is via jewelry. Unless you go in for garish wedding bands or are of Italian ancestry (wear a pinky ring), a wristwatch is your only piece of daily jewelry. & while a Prius will get you from point a to point b, few will view the gentleman behind the wheel of an eco-wagon like they will a Mercedes or Lexus. Similarly, if you dress to impress, rather than to fade into the masses, I think your watch should be up to the task. That said, there ARE some very cool quartz watches, I often wear 1 myself. But I would never suggest they are a preference for any reason other than variety or safety (if the potential exists that you may be headed into questionable locales)." -Fair points also, but I'm not trying to impress people. I do plan on getting the Aquis C.400 or a Seamaster in the future but only because of the prices going up and it'll be for the more dressy/formal occasions. Not really to brag or say "hey I have money". Total opposite actually for me. I just like the engineering/the changes that both companies have done.

I still have a great appreciation/love for automatics, but here's my reasons for using quartz more often: 1) More accurate 2) Less concerns about accidentally dropping it if I'm taking it off, better shock resistance. (Although Omega and Rolex have improved their shock resistance over the years). 3) Cheaper! 4) Less snobbery involved. As the mechanical aspect is not really as much of a focus. 5) Can replace the movement for $15 after 30 years if I cared to, and put them on daily. Quartz overall to me just have more advantages, but I have a lot of respect for the mechanical movements and the engineering involved. Unfortunately Omega/Rolex aren't going to bring back the quartz models that they once offered. The quartz seamaster (thermocompensated) had been a great value. The japanese still offer higher end thermocompensated quartz and Breitling.

I have a top also in one of my automatics from Germany and they're fantastic. It's a shame ETA isn't going to sell them outside of their group anymore.

Beatles: Back in the USSR

Very nice, I have no need for a chronograph personally...but I've been a fan of the style for years.

I respect the craftmanship that goes into making a Patek, or any high end brand. Capitalism does create opportunity for some, and then keeps others at the bottom. It's just life, I don't expect Rolex to collapse anytime soon. At some point though most people aren't going to be able to drop 20-30k on a submariner or datejust. It's just a matter of time. I don't even deny that if someone had true charity and had so much money that offered me a Patek or a Rolex...I'd accept it for free, I'd eventually sell it later on as it's not a necessary item for me to have. Is anyone ever going to do something like that? No. I'm hoping to see more mid-range divers out there, even if they can't be automatics that are good quality and get the job done for real scuba divers, not just desk dives! I don't expect prices to drop unless a recession happens, and that looks possible in the near future. I'd rather people have jobs and money coming in vs a recession. I appreciate your optimism/hope but that's very doubtful.

I have to agree, the used prices are getting really bad, especially for Vintage. It's good for anyone that bought the old Seamasters from the 70s for $300 back in 2010 or so.

So this post really doesn't apply much to the millionaires on the forum or people that can afford a 100k Patek. This is more for your average person that lives pay to pay or is middle class. As the prices get into really ridiculous/insane territory on some of these brands that are entry level "luxury" at best...are Microbrands the only viable option then? Rolex has just gotten into territory for MSRP that is just not even doable for most people out there. I predict that someday the party is going to end for them, and they'll be selling a lot less watches as a result of the prices just getting too inflated. Hopefully some brands out there keep the prices reasonable. I don't have a reason personally to ever buy a Rolex as my Owc Bond has been fantastic. Can't ever afford a Patek either, but I respect both brands contributions to horology. Even the japanese watches are starting to get into expensive ranges for movements that are average at best. Your thoughts?

https://www.sakurawatches.com/casio-oceanus-ocw-t200s-1ajf -Another one thats gotten a lot of praise on different forums, costs more but better quality, atomic too.

Just discovered this one, $116 on sale on some sites...not sold in USA, but it has sapphire! Casio Edifice EFR-S108D-1AVUEF

Has been running +1 for 2 years daily. Soprod movement is fantastic!

Stunning, it's just a shame they're not a bit more affordable.

To each their own, I'd personally take a Seamaster 300 over the Submariner because it has a more sporty look to it. METAS is stricter too vs chronometer. Rolex is classic obviously, but that's all they are ever going to be. But I'm not planning on ever spending so much money so it doesn't really matter.