Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Case Closed.


freddy333

Recommended Posts

Stumbled on this post rather late, but great find all the same Freddy!

In my opinion I prefer that the crystal only has AR coating under the cyclops....no AR on a Rolex cystal is how it has been since year 0, and if they start putting AR on ther crystals I think it would take away from that special Rolex characteristic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:g:

Please Concepta,

do not seed what I'm saying to our friend!!

:bleh:

If the GEN dial go on 2893, it go for sure on 2892-2 too.

They got same measures.

I think that Domi thought that is sure better to get one real GMT 2893 instead of a moded to GMT 2892-2 Not CHS!

And this is a fact!

The right CHS 2892-2 are difficult to find on the market and sure less durables than the great 2893 real GMT........

:thumbsupsmileyanim:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up