AsiadeCuba Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 Does any one know the width and thickness? A wrist shot difference would help too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jkay Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 The case size is the same between the two. The Sea Dweller has a larger dial, and looks bigger due to this. I'm talking about width, here. The SD is thicker, I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsiadeCuba Posted January 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 Thanks Kay. It looks way thicker no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jkay Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 I am not a vintage Rolex WIS .. I did a quick Google and found that info for you. The exact thickness of each, I do not know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ww12345 Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 IIRC, the SD actually has a smaller dial. It is substantially thicker than the 1680/5513 case, though I believe it is the same diameter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 the case is indeed taller. i will post a quick picture later side by side for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 here ya go hope this helps somewhat these are both 1:1 MBWs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldCorvette Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 Thanks for the pics High-O .. I was looking for some visual perspective as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ww12345 Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 I don't have pics handy, but the SD wears much higher than its Sub counterpart. The caseback alone is almost twice the thickness as the Sub caseback Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsiadeCuba Posted January 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 wow thanks high. that was a big help. i was searching the gen forums and i couldnt find it. lets hope i wont be too big on my 6.75 wrist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ww12345 Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 A SD? Not a chance. I've got the skinniest arms in the US and a SD doesn't look bad on me at all. Now a DSSD, that's another story! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 wow thanks high. that was a big help. i was searching the gen forums and i couldnt find it. lets hope i wont be too big on my 6.75 wrist i never found the sea dweller too big. just too tall, like you were wearing a dome shaped stadium on your wrist. much prefer the slimmer profile of the 5513 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.