Size difference from a 1665 and a 1680/16610?

[AsiadeCuba]

Does any one know the width and thickness? A wrist shot difference would help too

[Jkay]

The case size is the same between the two. The Sea Dweller has a larger dial, and looks bigger due to this. I'm talking about width, here. The SD is thicker, I believe.

[AsiadeCuba]

Thanks Kay. It looks way thicker no?

[Jkay]

I am not a vintage Rolex WIS .. I did a quick Google and found that info for you. The exact thickness of each, I do not know.

[ww12345]

IIRC, the SD actually has a smaller dial. It is substantially thicker than the 1680/5513 case, though I believe it is the same diameter.

[highoeyazmuhudee]

the case is indeed taller. i will post a quick picture later side by side for you.

[highoeyazmuhudee]

here ya go

hope this helps somewhat

these are both 1:1 MBWs

[OldCorvette]

Thanks for the pics High-O .. I was looking for some visual perspective as well.

[ww12345]

I don't have pics handy, but the SD wears much higher than its Sub counterpart. The caseback alone is almost twice the thickness as the Sub caseback

[AsiadeCuba]

wow thanks high. that was a big help. i was searching the gen forums and i couldnt find it. lets hope i wont be too big on my 6.75 wrist

[ww12345]

A SD? Not a chance. I've got the skinniest arms in the US and a SD doesn't look bad on me at all. Now a DSSD, that's another story!

[highoeyazmuhudee]

wow thanks high. that was a big help. i was searching the gen forums and i couldnt find it. lets hope i wont be too big on my 6.75 wrist

i never found the sea dweller too big. just too tall, like you were wearing a dome shaped stadium on your wrist. much prefer the slimmer profile of the 5513