Help needed - Is it GEN?

[rosnik]

One friend of me bought on Baya this "

Pre-Owned Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshores

, really cheap:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/180939977989?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com.au%3A80%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dm570.l2736%26_nkw%3D180939977989%26_fvi%3D1&_rdc=1

The seller get this pictures too,

do you think it's Gen or REP.

Do you think there is a joke under the action?

[Watchmeister]

Rep. His pictures are very strategic and it is state of the art - rounded pushers better date placement but no straight on of the crown and pushers and the hand tubes are always the instant give always. if anyone disagrees please chime in, Although the pictures obfuscate it it is possible the deployant is genuine in which case it is worth about what it sold for.

[Legend]

sorry saw the wrong watch.. its a rep!

[rosnik]

Thank you, I'll suggest my friend to not pay it.

Pay attention,

the listed watch pictures and up picture watch , are not the some.

Or the seller get one sending pictures error , or it's a steller.

Thank you friends!

[Legend]

Giveaways on the watch:

a. Rep hands

b. Case is 100% rep. The gens have plot screws perfectly centered and the reps have them slightly off center.

c. pushers look wrong

d. Crown and pushers alignment says rep, and angle of shot appears to be used to conceal this deliberately.

Your friend could ask for a direct close up shot of the dial to confirm, but from what I see, a definite REP.

[GreenHornet]

The strap looks to be rep too based n the eBay photos. My votes clearly goes to 100% rep