panerai153 Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 I'm trying to find out what Crown/tube is correct for the GMTIIC? How close is the rep crown, and would it be a worthwhile investment to change the crown/tube? i just got in a very nice GMTIIC, and I'm planning to replace the crystal with a genuine, get the movement serviced and possibly have the dial/hands superlumed. This watch is supposed to have a superlumed dila/hands, but I'm not really impressed with hte lume. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 GMTIIC crown should be a 704 (but a 703, which looks similar, will also work). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robaer Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 (edited) The tube on the NOOB GMT C will accept a gen crown, but IMO opinion it's not worth the change. The rep crown is not too bad and the rep GMT C has some flaws that are more obvious than the crown. Actually, I think that the rep GMT C is one of those watches that you can just leave as it is and just wear it. It's a very nice out the box rep, but even with heavy modding it can be spoted as a rep in less than five seconds by some one who is familiar with modern rolex watches. Even if you have it relumed the hour markers will be to small compared to the gen, and if you replace the crystal the date font will still be off and the wrong size, also if you have the movement serviced it will still have the wrong hand stack, though the hand stack problem is not very obvious. And if you spend time and money to get all of these flaws fixed, gen dial, BK date wheel, gen crystal and gen crown, the bezel will still feel wrong when you turn it compared to the gen and i don't think there's really a way to fix that, since the bezel construction can't be taken apart without damaging it. Oh and speaking of the bezel, the rep bezel insert is really nice but the engravings are not deep enough and slightly wrong font style compared to the gen and instead of platinum filling they have white/grey paint. A gen insert is almost impossible to source and probably super expensive if you ever find one. So, IMO the rep GMT II C is a great beater watch, but modding money should perhaps be spent on reps with better potential. Of course, this is just my two cents. I hope you enjoy the watch either way, I know i do. Edited August 8, 2012 by Robaer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panerai153 Posted August 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 Thanks for the help. Since I already have a genuine crystal, I'll certainly do that swap. AFA the movement service, I think that it's money well spent if you intend to keep a watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneed12 Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 Even if you have it relumed the hour markers will be to small compared to the gen, and if you replace the crystal the date font will still be off and the wrong size, also if you have the movement serviced it will still have the wrong hand stack, though the hand stack problem is not very obvious. I have a correct-hand-stack with BK DWO superlumed GMT IIC gonna try to fit a gen crystal tomorrow I think Thanks for the help. Since I already have a genuine crystal, I'll certainly do that swap. I've had spotty luck trying to fit gen crystals to GMT IIc reps. Anything can be made to fit if you're willing to glue, of course... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.