watchaddict Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 Just got this 114060 in today. Really surprised at how nice it is. Couple minor hiccups apart from the obvious wrong case but overall not bad. Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irolexu Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 Lookin good! 116610ln case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchaddict Posted September 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 Lookin good! 116610ln case? Correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irolexu Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Don't all rep 14060 and 114060 suffer from this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchaddict Posted September 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 I thought so but sneed mentioned (on RG) its not so. Anyone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 (edited) The case is a touch short, the hour hand is wrong, the ceramic engraving is too shallow, and not bold enough. The SEL's are 0.5mm to narrow, the dial fonts are a little off too. Crown guards off and crown not perfect. Anything else... Still, I have one (Noob) and its a beauty on the wrist! Especially at the price...plus as watchaddict says in reality these hiccups appear minor. Credit to Watch addict for his use of his photo in the comparison... Edited September 11, 2012 by Archetypal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archierocks Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 could you pm where u bought this please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulopha Posted September 15, 2012 Report Share Posted September 15, 2012 Don't all rep 14060 and 114060 suffer from this? Thinking about this one, with upgraded bezel flat "2"; triangle and pearl looks also a bit better in my view, but not quite sure regarding to the letters (looks yellow) - maybe only an effect ? Has anyone the new ceramic no date bought - would be grateful for pics. Cheers - mates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulopha Posted September 15, 2012 Report Share Posted September 15, 2012 Thinking about this one, with upgraded bezel flat "2"; triangle and pearl looks also a bit better in my view, but not quite sure regarding to the letters (looks yellow) - maybe only an effect ? Has anyone the new ceramic no date bought - would be grateful for pics. Cheers - mates Sorry here is the link: http://www.ttw168.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_7&products_id=9695 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted September 15, 2012 Report Share Posted September 15, 2012 not bad at all. looks like an improvement over the first one that debuted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted September 15, 2012 Report Share Posted September 15, 2012 That looks greta and the blue lume is a nice touch. On Joahandrews sites the bezel numbers looked yellow but yours look spot on. The case front on in the comparison looks good I guess its the profile thats out a bit Wear it well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted September 16, 2012 Report Share Posted September 16, 2012 (edited) Im pretty sure that the perfect clones and trusty version is not the noob as pictured in this thread. The crown and deep and wokky rehaut give it away. This is the noob latest version.. http://www.torobravos.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=39_115&product_id=648 The dial font looks different on the trusty/perfect clones version, perhaps more accurate. It'd be good for someone with the trusty/perfect version to chime in with some photos for comparison... Edited September 16, 2012 by Archetypal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixers_610 Posted September 17, 2012 Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 I love this watch.. hope they refresh it to be more like gen.. though I agree.. it's not bad right now. http://100percent-rolex.blogspot.com/2012/07/new-114060-in-da-house.html#!/2012/07/new-114060-in-da-house.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 the "superlative" "officially" alignment is a dead give away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 (edited) At this point let me ask a different question about factory rep ND subs, generally. Is this latest noob 114060 offering better than Josh's 5512/13, or Trevor's 14060? Im speaking purely from the watch you can wear without worrying about big obvious over sized crowns or super wokky rehauts, perspective. Sure, none of these models I mention are perfect - but the non loupe viewed engineering is pretty good on this 114060, is it not? Edited September 18, 2012 by Archetypal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixers_610 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 At this point let me ask a different question about factory rep ND subs, generally. Is this latest noob 114060 offering better than Josh's 5512/13, or Trevor's 14060? Im speaking purely from the watch you can wear without worrying about big obvious over sized crowns or super wokky rehauts, perspective. Sure, none of these models I mention are perfect - but the non loupe viewed engineering is pretty good on this 114060, is it not? Absolutely. Esp for the price.. you can't go wrong. Also, If you can appreciate a good looking watch regardless of accuracy, this has to rank up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackjo Posted September 22, 2012 Report Share Posted September 22, 2012 One great thing about this version is they have really improved the dial lume over the last Noob Ceramic Sub that I had. I put this next to my gen GMT 116710 and the markers look exactly the same. Indicie surrounds are nice and thin and no lumps in the lume which some of the SubC and DSSD suffer from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now