ck5533 Posted September 4, 2013 Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 Recently I've acquired a midcase 16610 T (M serial number) claimed to be Sean (etaswiss) from a member. After cleaned inside & outside of the midcase, found; 1. the crown guard is in a different shape, btw gen crown is on M case. 2. Crown (tube not screw tight yet) sitting much lower compare to my other Sean's sub case (V serial number). I am worry that the crown will touch the bezel once installed. 2. The lugs are pointy rather than flat compare to V case. 3. if you can spot others P/s: the one with insert is from V case. If you have a Sean's M serial number 16610 T case, please tell me this is the correct profile. Thank for looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck5533 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 Unable to edit post to add this info: For M case: Photo 1: left Photo 2: right Photo 3: M case Photo 4: V case Photo 5 & 6: M case Photo 7 & 8: bottom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_189 Posted September 4, 2013 Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 The top case the M95xx is a Sean/ETA Swiss case. The M58xx is not a Sean/ETA Swiss case. Can tell by the finish and the serial number. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck5533 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 (edited) The top case the M95xx is a Sean/ETA Swiss case. The M58xx is not a Sean/ETA Swiss case. Can tell by the finish and the serial number. Cheers! The top case reads V 9XXXXXX definitely from Sean, because I purchased it from Sean directly. Now, the bottom one M58XX where is this from?? Will be a easy tell if I try to install a gen movement tonight.............. Edited September 4, 2013 by ck5533 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck5533 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 anyone has a similar case with serial number of M588XXX?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted September 4, 2013 Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 I can see where the crown on the M case is set too far into the case. Looks like it will interfere with the bezel assembly when installed.I remember this being an issue with the WM9-V3 case, but crown position was higher on that case for a 2824-2/3135 movement. But I can't tell fr pic #2 that the crowns are at a different position- like you say, just that the cgs are shaped differently. If it fits a gen movement, it could be a WM9-V3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck5533 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 I can see where the crown on the M case is set too far into the case. Looks like it will interfere with the bezel assembly when installed. I remember this being an issue with the WM9-V3 case, but crown position was higher on that case for a 2824-2/3135 movement. But I can't tell fr pic #2 that the crowns are at a different position- like you say, just that the cgs are shaped differently. If it fits a gen movement, it could be a WM9-V3. You're right, after google WM9 on net, it looks exactly like mine. I still prefer Sean or TC case though, is the best out of the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck5533 Posted September 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2013 It does take gen movement without mod. Which is more accurate comparing to gen, WM9 or Sean/TC?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ephry73 Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 That looks like the BK case. The little movement notch matches one i bought last year with same serial number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck5533 Posted September 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 That looks like the BK case. The little movement notch matches one i bought last year with same serial number other than that, i wish someone could tell me how it compares to gen in term of accuracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now