Could this be a genuine Submariner Maxi dial?

[Whatever123]

Hi there,

 

could this be a genuine Rolex dial? Experts, please chime in... 

 

 

I will give you more details later, but right now I would just like to have the opinion of our Rolex experts here. 

 

Thanks!

Whatever123

[Erict719]

No, rep dial

[pam007]

Nope Rep Dial. 

Look at the sloppy lume application hour indicies.

 

Also the 6 and 9 o'clock indicies are too fat for a 16610LV Maxi Dial. 

 

the "FT" is wrong for the 116610LN Maxi Dial

[Whatever123]

First of all: Thanks. And yes, I'm pretty sure it's a rep too.

But sloppy lume? No, that might just be the photo angle. The ft is wrong and the 6 and 9 markers are to thick? Hmm... really? The gens I see in photos look pretty much the same to me... well, probably slightly too thick on the markers...

It's supposed to be a 16610LV (with black insert) btw.

[pam007]

 the 6 and 9 markers are to thick? Hmm... really? The gens I see in photos look pretty much the same to me

 

Let me help you out since your eyes are bad.

 

your dial is a mark IV.

 

crown and indicies are wrong

 

 

 

Edited October 5, 2013 by pam007

[Whatever123]

That helps, thanks. Now I can see the differences.

Still - in person and without a loupe I wouldn't be able to tell. Maybe my eyes are bad indeed...

[911flyer]

That helps, thanks. Now I can see the differences.

Still - in person and without a loupe I wouldn't be able to tell. Maybe my eyes are bad indeed...

Some of the guys here are so damn good with spotting gens, truly incredible!!! Thanks pam007 for that little explination, now all our eyes just got better.

 

CHEERS

[Rolexman]

Well I handled this dial and It remarkably had all the right markings on the back....