marrickvilleboy Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Hey guys, I know quite a few people have asked to have a side by side comparison. Here's a quick and dirty one to give you some better idea of what the flaws are. Overall, the wm9/BK submariner is very very good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProMariner Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Great rep and very close to the original, I think all 16610 rep always have there CG's non accurate, TC does them very well, but without minor flaw (if we can call it a flaw) the watch looks exactly almost the same (great dial btw) There's a little difference in the pearl also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightwatch Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Thanks for the comparison, quite near. The missing crown one has a slightly misaligned triangle too. But with a 10x lupe they look different:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erict719 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Can u do more pics please. I have been waiting for this so long. close up in rehaut height and crown wil be good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erict719 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And also the hands close up. I think gen have flatter lume on hands too!?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.