Rep or gen 16610?

[janeto72]

here is  a nice one to tease everyone....rep or gen 16610..? Have fun.... ;)Let me know your thoughts on this one....and if it's real...from what era.....and is it correct for the era?...

[dbane883]

Sean case. Gen dial

[janeto72]

@DBane.....come on brother...put a little more effort into it...  give us some real critism here....I would like to know how well we know our watches.

[dbane883]

@DBane.....come on brother...put a little more effort into it... give us some real critism here....I would like to know how well we know our watches.

Hey. I'm in the middle of coaching sons basketball teams practice.

[janeto72]

@dbane...awesome brother....!!!

[seafoam]

Is that a ST case. I think I also see a bk tw flat s dial. If so I have the same dial. Love the flat s dial. Looks nice j72

[dbane883]

Ok back home now. I stand by my guess that its a gen dial. Most likely D Serial. Roughly 2005-2006. Don't think lugholes are accurate for that era. Seafoam could be correct. Bit fat for a Sean case. ST case that's had the lugs drilled a bit and chamfered.

[Erict719]

gen dial, rep hands , tc v3 Dwo, gen bracelet and clasp.

case... I don't know , lugs look so fat!

[6now]

Rep case, gen dial, rep bezel assembly, gen insert, rep hands, gen bracelet. Almost correct build except dial.

Edited February 19, 2014 by 6now

[sputim]

Yup hands are rep, rest as above and gen crystal as well