swdivad Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 Not sure if this has been brought up before... Has anyone else noticed that the 3, 6, 8, 12 cutouts font seem a bit anorexic on the rep from the TDs photos? Gen: Rep(s): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbobdobalina Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 Yep, they look too thin even without comparing next to the gen. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markiemark Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 You forgot this one: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swdivad Posted December 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 I got one a while back, the watch was so nice to me I didn't even do a comparison... You'd think they'd at least measure the gen... jeez! Here's my qc pic next to the gen: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fana05 Posted December 22, 2014 Report Share Posted December 22, 2014 Have the Noob version and it's absolutely gorgeous. If this is true I'm surprised ale didn't mention it in his pam guide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpletiv Posted December 25, 2014 Report Share Posted December 25, 2014 Not to mention the 2 is miss shaped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amulet3000 Posted January 1, 2015 Report Share Posted January 1, 2015 I am a professional photographer and can say the difference is in the photos and not in the watch's appearance. The lens in the Genuine Panerai Product shot was done by a professional. They most likely used a High magnification macro lens which changes the magnification of everything as well as eliminates distortion. The photo was taken with high power diffused studio lighting as well which make the cutouts look completely uniform. The other photo was most likely taken with a camera phone or at best a low range SLR with a kit lens. The difference in focal lengths and lens distortion are apparent to the trained eye. Not to mention the atrocious lighting. I am confident that if both watches were photographed under the exact same conditions there wouldn't be a visual difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.