marrickvilleboy Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Thought i'll update you guys on this build which sadly has taken several months to finish. Most of the reason is because I had other projects more important but nonetheless, here it is. So the original thread is below: http://www.rwgforum.net/topic/176763-wip-building-a-cheaper-alternative-to-tc-submariner-16610/ The original thought was to see if a cheaper alternative could be built vs. the TC Submariner. I think i'm pretty close to shaving half the price. The original cost-benefit comparison again: The total that i spent was just under $300 including shipping of all the parts. The reality is, many members are upgrading their TC subs for genuine parts which means there are a surplus of TC parts around. For example, I picked up the bezel insert, DWO, bracelet, crown and tube for under $100. The interesting part is I have a genuine 16610 D-serial piece which corresponds directly to this rep, including the flat "s" in submariner. Another great feature of this old TW case is that there are engraving (whereas the new TCs don't) so the D-serial and 16610 T markings makes this a little nicer! Here are the final pics, enjoy and let me know any comments (good and bad are welcome!) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSTEEL Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Well done, nice rehaut too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpz5142 Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Nice breakdown, good thing about TC getting new versions is that members are selling off their parts. The one comment I have is the SEL fit, it is tricky with the TW case which is why I sold my TW and ended up with a TC. Other than that great build for the cost! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marrickvilleboy Posted June 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 thanks gents. The TC SEL needed to be shaved slightly to make it fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpz5142 Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 The TC SEL needed to be shaved slightly to make it fit. Yes, however even after sanding the SEL it doesn't sit recessed as the gen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marrickvilleboy Posted June 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Yes, however even after sanding the SEL it doesn't sit recessed as the gen. Yes you are correct - its fits funky haha but i'm ok with that to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ephry73 Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Some older TC bracelets DO fit better. This is a V2/V3 hybrid on an old BK Wm9 v3 case with M serial you can see how there is almost no recess from the top of the lug to the top of the SEL. The watch is sporting gen insert, gen crystal, gen crown on BK tube, gen gaskets all throughout, with a BK dial and a mix of TC and ST hands on a high-beat asian movement for no issues with the date wheel. Not as much as a TC by any chance, but I build it from parts I had laying around. It is possible to build a nice, gen spec, or gen like Sub that can be worn daily and that will be waterproof and will also look great on the wrist. Because of how slim the case is I am tempted to go drill-through lugs for an early 16610 build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
droptopman Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Nice work here. Pretty awesome looking budget build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubersub Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 I'm a little late to this party, but nice project and good outcome! You used the TC bezel/insert. I am interested in that. Did you find this to have a more rounded appearance than gen? I don't really notice it remarkably in the pictures, but had followed some discussion of this issue on his (TC's) website. I think your comment was to the effect that who is going to see this from 50 paces, anyway, which I'm on board with. I am trying to research the 16610 before I sink too much money into my first build and was thinking of going with the gen bezel right out out of the gate, but I have to say, again, that your pictures make a good argument for the TC Vintage Bezel. Great to see your project. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streethawk Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 Great idea and beautiful sub ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.