Dario33 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Check it out: http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tre...61008&rid=0 I guess it was only a matter of time before someone attempted to pass it off as a gen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoooooonz Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Might have been wise to take off the plastic wrapping before trying to pull this scam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dario33 Posted March 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 ^ Yeah, no kidding. I gotta hand it to him though...he conveniently placed the minute hand so it covers the straightline 'S' that preceeds 'SuperOcean'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisque Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrgod Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 It is already discussed Here.. If you read the ad, he has posted a link to pictures of the actual watch for sale... Those pictures seems to be of a gen.. It seems like the seller actually has found a nice picture of a Replica to front his ad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruce79 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 first pic is obviously taken from google images or something...his link to the actual watch for sale looks good to me...saw this a couple days ago and thought the same thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panerai-ss Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Both display photo and actual photo look definitely rep to me. The obvious difference points is the numbering on bazel. The gen has more curve but the rep is square. I cannot understand the price is US$1,200. What happen if someone pays for this and found that it is rep of USD300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yannou Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Rep (see the date on the actual pictures..) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 The actual pictures look genuine and also it shows the previous model OEM bracelet and NOT the current OEM or rep type. There is no reason other than your over suspicious minds to say this is fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rxus Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Doesn't his original post say something not having papers for it? If so that seems shady as hell even if it is gen, it coulsd easily be stolen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now