APROO size comparison

[Guest overboosted]

Can any one that has a newer AP ROO with SS bracelet take a pic of it beside a Rolex or PAM to help a brother out?

I really like them but fear it may be too big for me. Dealers list them at 42-43mm but I think they sit a bit bigger than a PAM from wht I remember hearing.

Thanks!!

[dadog13]

there was a pic from aaronk_83 with near a Hublot BB...and it seems that it's pretty huge!

[dadog13]

link : CLICK ME

[Guest overboosted]

Saw that one,,,was hoping to get a pic of it with something more familiar to me though.

It does look a bit monsterous in that pic though.

[rek001]

The end links integrated into the case certainly don't help us slim wristed folks, they really stick out away from the wrist.

Sadly, I think the APROO is a no go for me.

[MADRED7]

@overboosted

I don

Edited April 19, 2007 by PAM1A

[Guest overboosted]

111 works for me,,,but Big Bang seems awkward because of the lugs/nonlugs/endlinks.

Afraid this will be the case with the ROO

[azgjav]

i have a 6.5" wrist and i'm getting the APROO soon. maybe u shld wait for my review?

[eunomians]

I'd sure like one, but 44 PAM is as big as I can go. Actually, I can do Black Seal, but it's thin, so it works for me.

But 47mm Fiddy is ridiculous on me. I guess no APROO for me

[tobico]

APROO and big bang is relatively bigger than Pam111. I have a small wrist and found that pam is probably the most fit. My girl cannot fit in any of 44mm watches except the Pam. However, the bigger it is, the more muscular it shows.

[Logan]

The Offshore feels very large. Also the Royal Oak bracelets don't adjust well down to smaller wrists as its just can't bend enough to allow for the removed links. I'd suggest trying the real thing first, expecially if you considering the MBW due to its cost.