llsteve80 Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 I know the print is too white, but hey I might get it kind of cheap. I did get one for 60 bucks once and I think it looked better than this but who am I? I've never seen an orig 5513/12 vintage dial in person anyway, just refinished stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
predfan2001 Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 It looks ok to me but I'm no expert. I know that Wightstuff knows alot about the 5512/5513 dials. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llsteve80 Posted October 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 It looks ok to me but I'm no expert. I know that Wightstuff knows alot about the 5512/5513 dials. Thanks, I might get it if it's really gen. Gotta check it out monday, for sure a refinish but what the heck. Maybe wightstuff will pop in here and school us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1665fan Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 It's not very accurate. Sorry to say but only the crown and the Rolex writing make it easy to spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HauteHippie Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 Looks fake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eunomians Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 Not bad for $60 though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llsteve80 Posted October 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 Not bad for $60 though. This guy wants a little more, sorry I was talking about a bunch of dials I got for 60 a piece a while back that included a james bond dial, 11623? daytona dial, 1 MOP diamond dial for pres, old explorer dial, red diamond pres dial. 300 for all of them shipped, I miss that guy.... Current guy wants 100, I'm waiting to see if it is a gen refurb or just a total copy. Value on a refinish should be +/- $180, not sure on copy though. I see so many variations of the same dial that I'm beginnig to wonder if any of them are even real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HauteHippie Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 This guy wants a little more, sorry I was talking about a bunch of dials I got for 60 a piece a while back that included a james bond dial, 11623? daytona dial, 1 MOP diamond dial for pres, old explorer dial, red diamond pres dial. 300 for all of them shipped, I miss that guy.... Current guy wants 100, I'm waiting to see if it is a gen refurb or just a total copy. Value on a refinish should be +/- $180, not sure on copy though. I see so many variations of the same dial that I'm beginnig to wonder if any of them are even real. Total copy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llsteve80 Posted October 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Total copy. how can you tell from the front? actually i guess it doesn't matter if it looks like crap, i'm not going to buy it. I wonder if they take gen dials off more common watches and refinish them to rare dials. who is to say whether something was originally a bond submariner dial when i could have started it's life of as a more common one of the same size? Might as well get a HQ total fake I'm not gonna buy it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddhead Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 how can you tell from the front? actually i guess it doesn't matter if it looks like crap, i'm not going to buy it. I wonder if they take gen dials off more common watches and refinish them to rare dials. who is to say whether something was originally a bond submariner dial when i could have started it's life of as a more common one of the same size? Might as well get a HQ total fake I'm not gonna buy it. I think you made the wise choice. I am far from an expert but the dial really does not look very good. There is no detail or depth to the markers. 5513 dials are beautiful.. the markers are offwhite and on the year gilded. they our outlined very subltly and gold. they have a lot of depth. To me, the markers on the dial you are considering is too flat... one dimensional and lacking in detail. I would not pay $100 for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HauteHippie Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 how can you tell from the front? actually i guess it doesn't matter if it looks like crap, i'm not going to buy it. I wonder if they take gen dials off more common watches and refinish them to rare dials. who is to say whether something was originally a bond submariner dial when i could have started it's life of as a more common one of the same size? Might as well get a HQ total fake I'm not gonna buy it. Just an educated guess based on the poor dial printing. It looks like a total copy in good condition, not a restored gen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewightstuff Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 (edited) yep, totally not real, you did good to stay away, though it is nicer than the regular 5513 rep dials thats for sure, but only because they are so woeful. for $50 it wouldnt be a bad job to replace the normal rep dials, it would help a little but it wouldnt pass much as gen i cant imagine well spotted guys fonts are all wrong across the board, spacing is all wrong particularly with the depth rating and submariner, markers are funny sizes and swiss T25 isnt nice either. coronet is poor too, its like a gilt shape. Edited November 1, 2007 by thewightstuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.