mattegold Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 Just curious if the automatic 7750 will fit into a JF case. The JF case is a bit thinner Crystal-to-Caseback, and I have heard differing opinions on the subject. Are modification required to allow fitment? Is it a pretty straight swap? Any and all insight is appreciated. -M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbell6 Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 How about the pusher holes? The Jimmy Fu case doesn't have pusher holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattegold Posted May 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 How about the pusher holes? The Jimmy Fu case doesn't have pusher holes. Are you talking about 'pusher holes' for a Chrono? I am trying to build a PAM104 with a JF case, so I wouldn't need the Chrono 'pushers' if that's what you are referring to. If you are talking about something else, please enlighten me. Just trying to figure out if a 7750 is too 'thick' for a JF case... or if it would even be appropriate. -M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest carlsbadrolex Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMman Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 Just curious if the automatic 7750 will fit into a JF case. The JF case is a bit thinner Crystal-to-Caseback, and I have heard differing opinions on the subject. Are modification required to allow fitment? Is it a pretty straight swap? Any and all insight is appreciated. -M Don't know the answer but don't forget that the autos have a diffent caseback from the handwind models and Jimmy's caseback is for handwinds. Maybe adding the appropriate back to Jimmy's case will help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofSpeed Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 I don't think it is thick enough... The 6497 is 4.5mm thick.... and the 7750 is 7.9mm thick.... 3.4mm of difference is quite a lot IMO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbell6 Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 Are you talking about 'pusher holes' for a Chrono? I am trying to build a PAM104 with a JF case, so I wouldn't need the Chrono 'pushers' if that's what you are referring to. If you are talking about something else, please enlighten me. Just trying to figure out if a 7750 is too 'thick' for a JF case... or if it would even be appropriate. -M Yes, dumb comment on my part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattegold Posted May 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 Don't know the answer but don't forget that the autos have a diffent caseback from the handwind models and Jimmy's caseback is for handwinds. Maybe adding the appropriate back to Jimmy's case will help. Thanks for the heads up. I have an auto caseback sitting here next to a handwind and yes, I can clearly see what you are saying. The Auto caseback will get the nod if this does indeed become a auto. However the JF still seems a millimeter 'shorter' not taking the caseback into account. Wondering if anyone out there HAS a JimmyFu 104 (or any Auto for that matter). Anything to watch out for during the process? TIA. -M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattegold Posted May 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 I don't think it is thick enough... The 6497 is 4.5mm thick.... and the 7750 is 7.9mm thick.... 3.4mm of difference is quite a lot IMO... Woah! I had no idea it's that big of a difference. Hmmm... looks like plans may be changing. Thanks for the heads up. -M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 I don't think it is thick enough... The 6497 is 4.5mm thick.... and the 7750 is 7.9mm thick.... 3.4mm of difference is quite a lot IMO... Absolutely agree. If you try and put a 7750 into a case for manual PAM, the least it can happen is that the stem does not align. Most likely, even the caseback will not close. If you want a handy reference about a few movements sizes, maybe this can help: Movements.xls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofSpeed Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 very nice.... thanks for the spreadsheet... definitely one to keep! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattegold Posted May 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 Absolutely agree. If you try and put a 7750 into a case for manual PAM, the least it can happen is that the stem does not align. Most likely, even the caseback will not close. If you want a handy reference about a few movements sizes, maybe this can help: Movements.xls Thanks for the file Thanks for the input guys, In my defense, the idea of a 104 in a JF case was put in my head from this post. I guess now I have to decide on a new project... anyone willing to part with their 6497 Swan Neck w/Dagger? -M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofSpeed Posted May 7, 2008 Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 contact hooligan on rwi... he was going to take one out of a watch of his (closed-back PAM) and swap it with an undecorated 6497 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattegold Posted May 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2008 contact hooligan on rwi... he was going to take one out of a watch of his (closed-back PAM) and swap it with an undecorated 6497 Thanks for the lead. -M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now