2005SUBMARINER Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 puals version of the new rolex deepsea seadweller .. puals deepsea sd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dluddy Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Looks more like a standard modern Sea Dweller to me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2005SUBMARINER Posted August 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 neeeds lots of work but i think soon some one will have a decent version . i havent buy REP in about 2 years do to the increase of price & the asian eta issue but as soon as this baby is available i will buy it .. lets hope its soon & at least close to the real deal .. rock on man ,,. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perry563 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Completely inaccurate but maybe a sign that a ultimate or perfect version may be in the works. This however is a terrible rep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Yeah, a bad rep indeed... but the rep still looks better than the gen. It doesn't have the ugly protruded and badly fitting SELs as the genuine. DeepSea is not a disgrace like YMII, it really is a tool watch with impressive technical specs, but it's just plain fugly. I wouldn't buy the rep no matter how well they'll replicate it. The gen SFSO also has an impressive depth rating, looks 100X better and costs only 1/7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 For a watch like the Deep Sea, it's only going to attract attention, especially from the die hard Rolex WIS. That said, why would someone want to draw attention to themselves wearing a rep like that? The DSSD is not to my personal taste, but it does have technical and functional merit. It may be one of those watches that I warm up to eventually, but for now, it's just a bit too... Eccentric(?) for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Yeah, that rep is horrible. Wrong size and wrong everything else. I am the one of the few folks who actually like the Deep Sea. I have been waiting for a larger Rolex for years. Now I just got to save up my pennies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Once again, I have to be the sole dissenter on the block, at least partial dissenter. For $100, it looks like a nice rep. At least they got the depth rating right (which the previous rep got completely wrong). But it is a $100 rep, which means it is far from accurate & not likely to fool anyone who knows anything about these watches. But when a proper SDDS does arrive & I am certain it will be sooner rather than later, it will have a nice, cozy spot waiting for it to sit, unworn, in the bottom of 1 of my cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.