FxrAndy Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 no papers also have a look Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolex001 Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I really don't see anything wrong with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I dont either it just looks to new and clean for a watch of that age, it must be over 10 years old, (no expert at all on tudors) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arty909 Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Someone's going to get a gem there- both the folded Oyster bracelet and the tall acrylic crystal suggest to me that it's legit- Arty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazarini Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Age is relative Andy ... my EXP 2 will be 9 years soon and it don't show it at all... depends on how much watch was wore and in rotation etc. Laz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.