Iwc F.a Jones With Special Movement

[t]

here my special IWC F.A Jones again

looks not like genuine movement... but i think it is much better than asian decorated unitas movement

decorated asian unitas look nice and similar like genuine iwc movement... but the quality???

I HATE ASIAN MOVEMENTS

sorry

[ubiquitous]

tourbillon-

Thank you!

[cwai02]

I think the Asian version looks better. Also, Not to forget you are selling the movement for $500+.

[t]

I think the Asian version looks better. Also, Not to forget you are selling the movement for $500+.

asian version looks better because looks like genuine

but it is better quality?

asian panerai movements look nice, too.

BUT [censored] QUALITY

i have bought 5 asian unitas movements in panerai watches

4 of them are demaged

NEVER AGAIN

[Highflyingclive]

The Zigmeister speaks very highly of the Asian copy of the hand-wind 6497 movements...

[t]

The Zigmeister speaks very highly of the Asian copy of the hand-wind 6497 movements...

The Zigmeister say: ....????

asian unitas movements with cotes de geneve style have a regulator without function????

simple regulator is a dummy????

look here

[Highflyingclive]

My understanding is that the regulator is quite functional. It lacks the swan-neck hardware... which isn't necessary on the real watch, let alone on the rep. It does look pretty... but that's its main purpose in life Marketing flim-flam, in my opinion. A feature without a major benefit.

Millions of other movements manage quite happliy without the swan-neck gubbins.

[Quarks]

Me likey!!!

[MAHLER]

Nice project tourbillon1801 !!!

I don't share your hate on the Asian movements, some movements are for instance very beautiful & precise as this :

[ubiquitous]

I just love the way that movement looks. It's finish is very intriguing and makes for an interesting swap in the Jones case.

[t]

Nice project tourbillon1801 !!!

I don't share your hate on the Asian movements, some movements are for instance very beautiful & precise as this :

i don´t like asian movements, because they looks bad

i hate it because they works bad

if asian movements works like swiss movements... i will never buy a swiss movement again

i have over 10 demaged replica watches here with asia 7750 and asia unitas movements

NEVER AGAIN

i have paid so much money for watchmaker and spend so much time

BTW... test the simple regulator on china unitas movement with cotes de geneve style... test it please. YOU WILL SEE IT IS WITHOUT FUNCTION

[MAHLER]

BTW... test the simple regulator on china unitas movement with cotes de geneve style... test it please. YOU WILL SEE IT IS WITHOUT FUNCTION

You have reason. But not all the asian movements working bad.

Unfortunately the reps are not a good point of departure to judge the Asian watchmaking.

[t]

You have reason. But not all the asian movements working bad.

Unfortunately the reps are not a good point of departure to judge the Asian watchmaking.

you are right

not "all" asian movements work bad

if a asian movement work... they will work long time

but most of asian movements are demaged and without control

swiss movements work 99,9%... i have NEVER received a demaged movement

[MAHLER]

swiss movements work 99,9%... i have NEVER received a demaged movement

Statistically is right the 99% of the Swiss movements they don't have problems.

However I have noticed above all lately on brands Hamilton and Edox the spiral of the balance wist badly and folded up.

Edited July 16, 2006 by MAHLER

[dadog13]

that is a great looking mvt...just gorgeus...I like it a lot...

[t]

sorry

fancy movemts are out of stock