zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Take a look at my SD 16600: http://de.tinypic.com/r/2rr8axx/5 http://de.tinypic.com/r/1900o3/5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 one more: http://de.tinypic.com/r/rc0g00/5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jockl1978 Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 I vote for real - the base of the hour hand is relatively "small", not like the SSD who has a hour hand base is diameter wise nearly twice as large as the minute hand above (in my opinion the biggest flaw in the SSD) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Gen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimede Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Fake! This is my gen.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellus Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Sorry, it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 (edited) To all neutral readers: Please compare the writings of the 2 other posters with mine: take a closer look at the 1220m writing... I think the chinese ain't that talented in keeping the letters in line, or the "producer" had to much rice-wine! Edited June 13, 2009 by zigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 (edited) I guess the letters should be straight from every perspective: http://de.tinypic.com/r/29nxrn4/5 Edited June 13, 2009 by zigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimede Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Unfortunately, my friend, the photo has a big disturbance, the hands covering a major part of the logo, so you can err. Posts more photos with logo at 12 o'clock free. thanks. Archimedes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 What i notice here is that the two gens shown both have different markers at the swiss made point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Unfortunately, my friend, the photo has a big disturbance, the hands covering a major part of the logo, so you can err. Posts more photos with logo at 12 o'clock free. thanks. Archimedes all my other photos a free at 12 o clock... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimede Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Another pic my gen..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Hands and lume look too good. The only thing that would have me doubt is the date font. Otherwise, this looks gen to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Also... There are a couple of different variations of the dial, as with most Rolex production dials. e.g. round 'S' and flat 'S' Submariner dials as but one example to cite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 @archimede: you found some good pics on the internet! Plus your posts are off topic - please start your on threat about your watch. Here is my certificate: http://de.tinypic.com/r/2yv9nuu/5 http://de.tinypic.com/r/11ikgsk/5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellus Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 @archimede: you found some good pics on the internet! Plus your posts are off topic - please start your on threat about your watch. Here is my certificate: http://de.tinypic.com/r/2yv9nuu/5 http://de.tinypic.com/r/11ikgsk/5 never a gen .... it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 (edited) never a gen .... it Edited June 13, 2009 by zigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimede Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 @archimede: you found some good pics on the internet! Plus your posts are off topic - please start your on threat about your watch. Here is my certificate: http://de.tinypic.com/r/2yv9nuu/5 http://de.tinypic.com/r/11ikgsk/5 You do not need heated, if you asked a technical wall in a free forum you must accept without reservation the considerations. For me it un'onore be part of this community, even if for a short time I have known. That I am off-topic is just one of your arguments, but accept free. Also do you notice that I do a professional photographer and 25 years and I assure you that these photos so I have rights. Going back to your RLX 16600, I would like to see a photo of the back, a clock can not be judged by 2 photos (bad-pic). whith regard Archimede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 It is impossible to prove it to you until I open it up and only rolex is able to open up a sea dweller. So lets stop the discussion please. If you made the pictures I do admit, that at least you have a pretty good camera! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimede Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 (edited) It is impossible to prove it to you until I open it up and only rolex is able to open up a sea dweller. So lets stop the discussion please. If you made the pictures I do admit, that at least you have a pretty good camera! Of jokes about Rolex I have heard so many but I just missed you this: that the Sea Dweller Rolex can open only .... Thanks for your appreciation on my camera, but the goal is fixed Nikon 60mm Micro, which is very Good. And you think as I open this? Edited June 13, 2009 by Archimede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellus Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Of jokes about Rolex I have heard so many but I just missed you this: that the Sea Dweller Rolex can open only .... Thanks for your appreciation on my camera, but the goal is fixed Nikon 60mm Micro, which is very Good. And you think as I open this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimede Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 (edited) Edited June 14, 2009 by Archimede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 (edited) The opened Sea Dweller is not the one on your first post. Please take a look at the F (feet). One time, it has a short F and one time a long one - so Einstein, next time better take a closer look at other peoples' Rolex's before you post them... Edited June 19, 2009 by zigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigo Posted June 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 You and Mellus are a couple right?! You don't have to be shy, we have an open minded world guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellus Posted June 19, 2009 Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 You and Mellus are a couple right?! You don't have to be shy, we have an open minded world guys! sweety .... The opened watch shows us the wrong side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now