-
Posts
5,379 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Posts posted by cornerstone
-
-
They seem to have been working to bring the backup up to speed - the prices have been amended and accounts added.
But they still can't take Moneybookers, despite what the website says at the moment.
Cheers!
-
So I'm guessing that the only bit that actually works on this car is the clock! Are you sure this isn't a British car then?!
-
My 2852 stainless Crazy Hours rep's back, case, crown and buckle weigh 35g so:
35 g SS =84 g. gold / 31.1 grams per troy oz =2.7 troy oz X 75% gold X 625 USD/troy oz=$1218 worth of gold.
Here's how I sold it to Ms. A: In this uncertain times, everyone should own some gold to hedge against inflation and protect our savings from a catastrophic event---and what better way to store gold than in a gorgeous fake watch? She said, "That's some pretty good BS, honey, but if you have to have another watch it you might as well get this one..."
Seriously, if we can get enough interested buyers this for the price of the gold alone, it's a no brainer.
Let me just say, this a fantastic looking watch and fantastic value as a watch. I wish I had that kind of disposable fun money
But can I point out a potential flaw (might be wrong) in your gold value calculation for those interested in the 'investment' aspect. I think you worked out the weight of the gold based on the pure density, and then did the 75% calculation to bring it down to 18cts. But the 25% that isn't gold doesn't have the same density.
Stainless steel has a density of roughly 8g / cm3; pure gold 19.3g / cm3
18ct gold has a density of 15.3g / cm3 for pink (slightly less for red, slightly more for yellow)
So your 35g of stainless steel would not be 84g of 18ct gold, but 66.9 g of 18 ct gold. And, of course, only 75% of this is solid gold.
So your calculation would go 66.9 g / 31.1 grams per troy oz =2.15 troy oz X 75% gold X 625 USD/troy oz=$1008 worth of gold.
I could be way off - so please say if I've got this wrong.
As I said, even so, I think that's still a good deal and a 'lot of watch' for those that can afford it.
Best of luck guys!
-
They look nice!
-
Marathon
-
Kenneth Cole
-
The legendary (?!)
Innovative Sleep Solutions
Apparently it monitors your body, and wakes YOU up when it thinks is best. F*CK that! (I'm assuming it must be shock proof too!
)
-
UPDATED LIST OF THE GAME SO FAR:
Audemars Piguet
breitling
Cartier
Doxa
ETA
Franck Muller
Girard Perregaux
Hublot.
IWC
Jaeger-LeCoultre.
Krieger
Lemanina
Maurice de Mauriac
Officine Panerai...
Nike
NOMOS
Patek Phillipe
ROLEX
South Bend Watch Company
Tourbillon
Ulysse Nardin
Vacheron Constantin
Wakmann
Xemex
Yema
Zenith
A. Lange and Sohne
bulgari
Chopard
DUBEY & SCHALDENBRAND
Ebil
Frederique Constant
Glycine
hamilton
Ikepod
Jaquet Droz
Klaauw, Christiaan van der
Locman
Movado
Nina Ricci
Oris
Philippe Charriol
QUINTING
Raymond Weil
SWIZA
TITONI
United Colors of Benetton
Vincent Calabrese
Wenger
X-Data
Yes
Zodiac
Arbutus
Bedat and Co.
Calibre
Doxa
Emile Chouriet
Fortis
Gerald Genta
Hampden
Invicta Baby
JÖRG SCHAUER
KOBOLD
Laco by Lacher
Mount Royal
Nivada
Orient
POLJOT
Q&Q
Revue Thommen
Saint Honore
Technomarine
UZI
Vostok
Wittnauer
X Japan Watch
XACT
Yantar
Zodiac
Auguste Reymond
Blancpain
Carl. F. Bucherer
deLaCour
Ernest Borel
Fender
Grovana
Hugo Boss
INDUCTA
Jacques Lemans
Kolber
Laks
Marvin
Northeagles
Omega
Perrelet
Quick Silver
Reuge
Sinn
Traser
U Boat
Ventura
Wyler Vetta
X-Men watch
Yonger and Bresson
Zitura
Azimuth
Breguet
Chase Durer
Dubey & Schaldenbrand
Explorer
Formex 4 Speed
Gevril
Hebe
Indiglo
Juvenia
Klaus Kobec
Le Castel
MOMO
Nubeo
Octa Calendrier by FP Journe.
Pierre Laurent
Quadrato Perpetual Calendar by Ulysse Nardin.
Rado
Submariner by Rolex.
Tudor
UTS
Villemont
Watchpeople
X files watch
Yves Saint Laurent
Zeno
anonimo
Bertolucci
CORUM
Delbana
Eterna
F.P.Journe
Gucci
On to 'H' !!
-
@cornerston...you've beat me with the zeno...belive me...i was just about to post the pics of the same brand...
Cliche of the moment: great minds think alike!
Gucci
-
Eterna
Whoa that anonimo pic is quite big!
EDIT: lol! Snap! You beat me!
-
i HAD A WATCH TESTED FOR WATER PROOFING....THE TEST SAYS PASSED ON THE PRINTOUT THEY GAVE ME.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN....TEST PRESSURE: 5.098 BAR
INITIAL STRAIN : -032.9
STRAIN TREND -002.2
As Repaustria said, the test was for 5bar = 50m depth, and obviously it passed.
So that is the pressure at which the test is conducted, the other two figures are the results of that test.
I think the initial strain is the amount that the case compresses (shrinks) when the pressure is first applied. The strain trend then shows the change in that distortion after a period of time (say a minute).
If the trend is stable or negative then that is good - nothing is getting into the case. If the trend shows a positive, then something got into the case during the time the pressure was applied.
I think that's right - but someone else might know better.
-
You can subject a watch to the same static pressure it would experience at 200m while swimming vigorously at a depth of 1 meter. This is why the 200m rating is a benchmark.
I can't entirely get my head around this, but something just doesn't feel right (i.e. I could be totally wrong).
200m is an absolutely fuc*ing insane amount of pressure - 21kg per cm2. It's at the limits of human endurance. Yet we feel this with vigorous swimming? Wouldn't people pass out all the time?
As I said, I don't know, it just doesn't sit right.
-
Zeno
By the way, I just noticed that we managed to use Zodiac twice earlier
-
-
-
Is this when 'Powermax' goes bad?!
-
Here she is in all her glory!
So much still to play for!!
-
Geeze there must be some kind of prize we can give cornerstone for that one
Aww what the heck $1000 RWG cash coming your way
I would say that we have a front runner to win the ________________...Thank you! As you both know, I have often talked of my dreams of proudly owning a ________________... of my own one day
But plenty more good signs to come I'm sure!
-
Just teasing....!
-
-
Aspire is working now, but it seems that "Crazy Sale" is over now. :close_tema:
It might not be - the site that is running (or at least the one I connected to) is a May backup.
-
@By-Tor you're really going to confuse people as they desperately try to right-click on the boob pics now! lol!
@sennsi: hey, he's done, why isn't she doing the dishes already?
And to resume normal service.....
-
-
Back in town!
in General Discussion
Posted · Edited by cornerstone
(Recycling jokes already!)
EDIT: Sorry, forgot to add - welcome back!