Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

rolexmaniac88

Member
  • Posts

    291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rolexmaniac88

  1. I think by "bezels" you are referring to what we call "insert" or "inlay". The bezel is actually the metal ring on which you fit the insert.

    The thing you have to know if that they are two different sizes of insert depending if you have a submariner or a sea dweller. For instance, a gen sea dweller insert will not fit a submariner and vice versa. So it is probably that you are trying to fit a gen submariner insert on your sea dweller or the other way around!

    Hope i have been clear and hope that helps :victory:

  2. Well, you may be on to something RM! I have 4 gen 93150's and all have rounded ends like the pic of ubi's gen 78360.

    But the guy says gen Rolex... might ask him where it came from.

    All of my bracelets are pre-2000, 3 of the 4 are 70's and early 80's. The 4th may have a 98-99 clasp and also be 80's- I just don't know!

    I actually hope not to be on anything! :black_eye:

    With the little knowledge i've acquired, it just looks too much gen to be a rep bracelet. The printing of "93150" is really good as the general appearance. I'll be able to say more when i have the links on hand. So i really hope that this double weird looking ends are only how rolex made them afterwards.

    It could even make sense. Why would rep makers loose time with making a double hole thing when they could just make a simple rounded one??? Seriously?

    So my hope is it is something that came on the later version of the 93150. If only someone could confirm that, i'd be off the hook! Hope i haven't spend

  3. Everything looks fine to me. The 93150 links have a flat top '3' in 93150- the rep makers haven't caught on to that yet! The end links are also correct as are the hollow mid-links. Price is decent, but it's somewhat short- w/ end pieces and a clasp it's probably less tha 6-1/2"- w/ case it would be tight on a 7-1/2" wrist.

    Since you own a gen with probably a 93150 bracelet, maybe you could check out something on yours. The thing i'm not sure about is the end of the bracelet where you are supposed to put the endlinks.

    Here is a picture to illustrate what i mean (Ubi's credit for these ones, i think everyone will have recognize the marble :whistling:)

    Gen 78360 vs Rep 78360:

    Gen

    img6405h.jpg

    Rep

    img6408a.jpg

    Even for general purpose, it would be interesting to know if Rolex ever change their designs for the 93150 bracelet. :p

  4. Dear all,

    As someone raised some concerns, i'm wondering if the bracelet links you'll find here are genuine.

    What is your opinion?

    My concern are specifically adressed to the end of the bracelet where you are supposed to put the endlinks. Somebody told me most of the gens where all rounded and not with the "wave" you can see on this one. Would it have something to do with Rolex changing their design a bit or is it just a sign it is fake?

    Thanks in advance for all the help provided,

    Cheers

  5. Thanks RM, the forum appreciates it.

    Without the ongoing support, this place would cease to be.

    And a lot of information and wisdom would be lost.

    We need as many supporters as we can get.

    Thanks again.

    Offshore

    You are more than welcome. What i gave or share is not even enough for now, judging by the knowledge i've acquired these past few years. But it's coming!!!

  6. Thought i'd share this with the community. Not to brag or anything but more to encourage all the members that didn't do it yet to consider for a second what this forum is sharing with them.

    It took me a while to understand the necessity to donate to the forum. At first, i joined but didn't log to often, taking bits of information there and there. It actually took me a lot of time to purchase my first rep: almost two years i'd say. Along the way, i realized how great this community was and how important and fair it was to contribute to the whole thing. I found so many great members and information that you can't find easily elsewhere and even sometimes can't find at all! Even for the gen watches, given the fact that people here are specialized on rep, we have the knowledge of do's and dont's.

    Today, i log in almost every day and i find myself coming here just to hang, read stuff and all rather that just looking for info for myself. I log in to learn of course, to look at all the amazing stuff that is going on (projects finishing up, etc) but also, when i can, to share the knowledge i acquired!

    That is why i renewed my subscription for a year. :drinks:

    Next time, i'll go Platinum that's for sure! :Jumpy:

  7. Well, first off, judging by the sticker, it is vintage. Juding by the size between the lugs and form in general, my guess would be sea dweller or submariner. The A starter serial number puzzle me however. I can't go any further! Tell us what is this new toy you got there ! :thumbsupsmileyanim:

  8. No-date is the nicest Sub, vintage or new. My old man has a modern no-date, I have always admired the simplistic look. I actually prefer this over the cyclops models.

    If I ever buy another gen Rollie, this will be the one.

    Those frankens look amazing Ubi.

    PS: Will Rolex continue to produce the old styled no-date along with the 2010 fat lugs Sub?

    I fear not, and that's a shame, especially since the last ones were 4liners 14060!

  9. These fit gen-sized bezels (check with your rep seller if your rep fits this description), click here

    It is for my MBW 5513 who has already been fitted with a newer style gen service insert without the need to shave it. So i guess it should fit no problem! I am looking for a fat font to age!

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up