Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

XRT

Member
  • Posts

    300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by XRT

  1. This is the original hand set from the WM/MBW base.

    The crown and tube were already installed on this watch when I bought it directly from Watchmaster. I'm not sure if he drilled and tapped the crown tube opening.

    Thanks for the info. BTW, where do you get the hand set? Are they the original MBW as the current version of the second hand is all painted red.

    Also does it need to redrill and tap to fit in the gen. crown/tube?

  2. Taking the CG's down all the way until they are flush with the case is certainly one way to go for making a thin case 6542...I vaguely remember some pictures of that (NDT cases may be another option...albeit an expensive one)

    The reason I used the WM/MBW dial is because my genuine 1675 dial would not fit.

    XRT, I'm very jealous of your collection! :thumbsupsmileyanim:

    Saabin built a 6542 with the same Paul case. Great results!

    I've been trying to build a 1675 with the Silix watch too. The case seems to be the correct thickness -or should I say thiness. The lug holes are okay drilled out, they are ever so slightly a bit to the outer edge. I'll try and snap some updated pix in the next few days. Here' an old pix before I worked on the lug holes and case, the bezel is next. The darn case won't take a gen dial though :angry:

    DSCN4903.jpg

  3. Jetsons, I really want to see someone make a nice 6542...I bet you could do it ;)

    Looks like you can get the old 1675 case from Silix: Link

    As you can see, the bezel teeth are not very pronounced which is why they needed to be cut deeper.

    rols1174rl6.jpg

    On the 'face-on view' (below), you can see the bezel outer rim is too thick...this needed to be thinned out. As you remove much of the outer material to make the bezel thinner, you lose most of the depth of its' (already shallow) teeth...thus, they needed to be recut.

    rols1174uc5.jpg

  4. I completely remember Saabin's GMT...he did some unbelieable work in that shop. Is he still a member?

    Joe did an amazing job on this bezel (the key was to get the correct profile and teeth)...it still rotates too.

    The best dial version was the WM/MBW. It was unfortunately shiny with awful dial markers (as in your pic). Joe dulled the shiny background and relumed the markers with a vintagized paint scheme.

  5. Jetsons- You jogged my memory. The case is actually an old Paul GMT. The dial is a WM/MBW. The hands are Classicwatchparts.com.

    Another component of this watch that was majorly modded was the bezel. This is the standard bezel from this case...but with major work done to it (profile ground down so it is much thinner and the teeth carved into it by hand...which is why they look imperfect on zoom magnification. Joe and I spent many days sending genuine 1675 photos back and forth to each other until we both knew what the pointed CGs and bezel teeth were supposed to look like before he started on the mods.)

    BTW- this case does not fit the genuine dial (a lesson I learned the expensive way.) :huh:

  6. I'm not sure...I haven't seen this one around for a while.

    I have an extra bezel and insert (from Classicwatchparts.com) if we need to make another one if sellers' remorse strikes ;)

    ;) XRT, you have a keeper!

    I wonder what the total cost would be to replicate this? Is the MBW '41 even available anymore?

  7. This dial is major step up from the MBW/WM dial. I sold this watch to another member about 6months ago...he sent it to The Zigmeister to put on the NDT dial, and then he got bored of it...so I bought it back. Man, this is now a serious keeper. It is amazing how a dial can change your entire feeling about a watch.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up