Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

justlounging

Member
  • Posts

    407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by justlounging

  1. First one might be from a 16700..

    Second pic is an early GMT Master II dial, possibly around E series..

    The jubilee can be used for both but some GMT Master came fitted with the 580/93150 Oyster bracelets

    Gmt master II comes in 3 variations;

    Oyster 78360, 78790 and Jubilee 62510

    :)

  2. First of all, kudos on an amazing piece :good::drinks:

    Secondly, the photo with which you opened the thread has inspired me to plan a few minor cosmetic alterations to a budget GMT I was able to scrounge up the cash to order last week :victory:

    Thirdly, October? Which day? Mine's the 10th :good::drinks:

    PS May I re-post the first photo in the thread? :)

    Thanks and glad to hear the inspiration is being past on.. :)

    Yes October..24th mate.. :)

    I'm making the missus get me a TT for my pressie.. :D

    Go ahead with the re-posting..just remember to post up pics of your mod..

  3. There is a saying that goes like this:

    "Behind every successful man, there stands a woman"

    Here is a review that has not had its fair share of attention..and this build has been made specially for my missus..for her support, patience and understanding on my participationg in the 'Dark Side'..

    1970laidesrolead.jpg

    I had always wanted to get my missus a gen Ladies DJ and so did she in the early 2000s, when prices were not so ridiculous..right now, current prices for an early 2000-2003 series Ladies DJ would set you back at least US$3,500, depending on the condition, complete with box & papers, serviced, etc..

    Simply do a search on Google and anywhere on the World Wide Web with the words 'Ladies Datejust" and you will be hit with so many variations and combinations of this particular watch..

    In Asia, I personally believed that this had been the 'must-have' watch for most women..Of course in this new age, we have seen many women moving away from the small 29mm watchsize to much larger watchsizes such as 34mm, 36mm and as large as 40mm.

    Don't get me wrong, I think if a lady can pull of the look of having a chunky watch on her wrist, kudos to her! In fact I have seen a few women in my office wearing 40-44mm PAMs with no issues..

    That being said, I still like how a smaller watch doesn't call out for attention..Like a woman in a corporate power suit but discreetly wearing small and sexy pieces of lingerie for her man or lover.. ;)

    What originally got me started on reps (which i then quickly sworn off) was a His and Hers Datejust in 36mm and 29mm respectively..

    I destroyed mine but this was her DJ from the streets of Bangkok circa 2005..

    p1060201oy.jpg

    Clear casebook, crappy optics from the glass, rigid Jubilee, everything was simply: JUNK!

    Before I proceed any further, here are some general specifications of the Ladies Datejust:

    Disclaimer: The following information has been pulled off the Internet and I do not claim any ownership to it.

    Here are some Gen Reference Pics:

    picturelo.jpg

    picture2ju.jpg

    picture1th.jpg

    Facts about the Rolex Caliber 2235 Movement:

    Basic technical info for the 2235:

    Diameter = 20mm

    Casing diameter = 19.7mm

    Height = 5.95mm (5.4mm for the non-date Cal. 2230)

    Jewels = 31

    Power Reserve = Approximately 50 hours

    Introduced in 1999 when the 2135 was phased out.

    Some of the models that are installed with this movement:

    Ladies & Midsize Datejust and Yacht-Master

    2235 - introduced in 1999

    76188, 76198, 76243, 77080, 77014, 77483, 77518, 78158, 78159, 78238, 78240, 78248, 78266, 78268, 78273, 78274, 78278, 78279, 78286, 78288, 79068, 79078, 79079, 79089, 79126, 79136, 79138, 79158, 79159, 79160, 79163, 79166, 79173, 79174, 79178, 79179, 79190, 79238, 79240, 79288, 80298, 80299, 80318, 80319, 80328, 80329, 80359, 81209, 81339, 168622, 168623, 168628, 169622, 169623, 169628, 178238, 178288, 178158, 178279, 178239, 178159, 178243, 178246, 178296, 178286, 178245, 178274, 178275, 179136, 179138, 179158, 179175, 179178, 179179, 179239, 179160, 179165, 179166, 179168, 179173, 179298, 179368, 17945

    A closer look at the movement:

    The complete movement with both the automatic module and rotor (oscillating weight) attached.

    rolex223501.jpg

    Module still in place, but with the rotor removed

    rolex223502.jpg

    A clearer view of the movement, now that the automatic module has been removed. Note that, unlike the ETA 2892, the automatic module fits onto the movement allowing for larger diameter wheels of the driving train, and more freedom concerning their layout.

    The disadvantage of this approach is seen in the fact that the ETA 2892 is only 3.6mm thick versus the Rolex 2235 which is almost 2.5mm thicker!

    rolex223503.jpg

    Like its larger sibling, the Cal. 3135, the balance wheel has a bridge supporting it with provision for quick and easy adjustment of the end-shake.

    The underneath of the automatic module. One can clearly see how the reversing wheels have been modified slightly from those of the older Cal. 2135. I'm no mechanical engineer, but my feeling is that the slightly larger steel teeth allow for a more positive locking action when they are turned in reverse.

    rolex223504.jpg

    The dial side with both the calendar module and date indicator in place

    rolex223509.jpg

    The calendar module is still in place, but the date indicator has been removed.

    rolex223505.jpg

    The dial side sans calendar module

    rolex223506.jpg

    Back to the build, I would like to extend an extremely big THANK YOU goes to member jmb for his help. Without him, this build would not ever happen. :applause:

    He had posted earlier a thread about an upgrade of the Ladies DJ for his missus and I quickly PM-ed him if he was still needing the rep parts..Luckily for me, he was most willing to sell me an almost complete watch..I only had to assemble it or find someone to do it for me.

    These are the rep parts that I received:

    Black Baton Markers Dial with Matching Hands

    Midcase with Flute Bezel

    Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops

    Caseback with O-rings

    Crown

    Jubilee with Clasp and Endlinks

    ETA 2671

    DWO

    Having not worked or seen an ETA 2671 before, I approached Spinmaster to assist me with assembling it. Doing a full service to the movement to ensure a few more years of worry-free usage.

    And now that I got it back, It will be gift-wrapped for her birthday towards the end of August.

    Before that happen may I present to you the Ladies DateJust 69174..

    p1060181l.jpg

    Dial and Hands

    p1060182j.jpg

    p1060183t.jpg

    p1060199d.jpg

    Fluted Bezel, Sapphire Crystal & Cyclops, Crown

    p1060184q.jpg

    p1060185s.jpg

    p1060186l.jpg

    p1060187t.jpg

    p1060198g.jpg

    Jubilee Bracelet, Endlinks and Clasp

    p1060189.jpg

    p1060193q.jpg

    p1060195o.jpg

    p1060188u.jpg

    p1060191i.jpg

    p1060197rp.jpg

    Caseback

    p1060190i.jpg

    p1060196y.jpg

    A quick comparison between what is and what was:

    p1060202d.jpg

    The differences are as obvious as day and night..

    And finally a quick pic on the missus' wrist..had to pry it off her.. :lol:

    p1060200i.jpg

    Hope you guys enjoy this as much as I have enjoyed putting it together..and hopefully thru this, there will be more love for the Ladies DJ and more love shown to the women supporting us men in this hobby.. :D

  4. Some additional pics for anyone who has a WSO bezel insert..this is a comparison with gen bezel insert..

    Gen insert is installed on the bezel, WSO Bezel is always in the foreground

    p1060178u.jpg

    p1060177j.jpg

    p1060176w.jpg

    p1060175y.jpg

    p1060174a.jpg

    p1060173p.jpg

    As you can see, there are very subtle differences, mainly in the curvature of the '2', '6', '8' and '0'..'4' looks really close, thickness of the font is slightly wider on the rep..Also the dot separating the numbers is slightly larger on the rep as compared to the gen..

    Some other pics:

    p1060180z.jpg

    p1060179q.jpg

    Separate question:

    Which looks better?

    p1060171g.jpg

    p1060172.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up