ryyannon

Dun worry...lotsa whitey trailer trashy types takin' the hits so's they can steal da Iraqi oil an' rape da' commie wimmen: yeah, McCarthy would be proud of 'em. Nuttin' to see here - just move along please...

God, this is so exciting I never knew...

Man, I'd kiss hers!

Now look at what you b1tches have started...

"Wearing a tie might make you more intelligent." 8 out of 14...

Ok, it's time to smarten you mugs up. The Difference Between Shiit and Shinola: Clearly Defined, Once and For All http://www.pottymouth.org/humor/shinola.html

And nobody here except us chickens....

Just like all the really cool people are at RWI....

Not to mention that TRL: it just screams 'FAKE!'

Brosnan looks like he's wearing a rep: skinny-looking crown there...

I'd like two mojitos, my dear - and thank you for offering....

There's a fine line between not caring what anyone thinks and not caring if you sacrifice you own population along with that of your enemy in a nuclear confrontation just to prove a rather obscure point of religious dogma. Do you ever actually read the links I post, or do you just go from one idea to another pushing your own version of moral relativism, no-good/no-bad-in-the-world? Honestly dude, that's soooo last year....

Portrait of a future contributor to The Shortest Thread Ever posting his toasties. The image of moderation:

Mmmm! Post Toasties! Now with Cut-Outs on back and sides!

Simply stated, neither he nor millions just behind him give the slightest shi.t what you or anyone else think. You are simply not operating on the same frequency. Read through this documentation - the exact same story whether published by the far left or the far right and everything in-between - and then connect the dots: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=A...G=Google+Search Special Miss Barrett version: Since you are capable of actually reading a long text and apparently have been trained as a historian, I recommend this one to you - fine print, footnotes and all: http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/ahmadinejads-world et bon appetit.

So the little dude enters our territory and in front of an audience of university students and gazillions of people watching on either live or delayed broadcast television, casts doubt on who was behind 9/11, the reality of the Holocaust, and America's domestic and foreign policies. When pressed for clear answers to questions concerning Iran, he obfuscates to the point of putting half the audience to sleep with convoluted answers which invariably lead to one idea: it's all (choose one) Israel's / America's fault. None of this nonsense ('no homosexuals in Iran') was really intended for consumption by the Americans or even the rest of the Occidental world: it was the equivalent of [censored]-slapping the West - albeit with a velvet glove - to show the folks back home, from Indonesia to Gaza and points beyond, who's on first and who isn't. Columbia University, in its role of useful idiot, played right into his hands. Elsewhere in America, a full 36% of those polled, stated that they would prefer Ahmadinejad to Bush as President of the United States. Ahmadenijad succeeded wonderfully in demonstrating - at least to those intent on taking our civilization down - that we're ripe for it. ============ QUOTE should be interesting to see... will this recorded? and aired on televsion? Doubtfully. It's a private session, else why use tickets? And recorded, only if someone managed to sneak in a digicam or similar, and record it -- like they did with Ann Coulter. Uh folks...are we on the same page here? The same planet? There were live feeds all over the Net.

The Shortest Thread Ever is not like other threads: there are no posts here.

Not to mention a speaking engagement for him in Iran. As for Columbia - along with the ROTC, dissenting currents of political thought (read 'conservative') are officially banned at Columbia. I could find the links documenting this rather surprising fact - and probably will ulteriorly - but I'm otherwise involved tracking our man's speech at the U.N. http://www.wnbc.com/video/13298034/index.html Q: "Why does your government execute homosexuals?" A: "Iran has no homosexuals." Either he means that Iran has already executed them all....or he's been taking lessons from Comical Ali (aka: Baghdad Bob).

You can bet your best Submariner that our man will be on his best behavoir: it's in his interest to give the impression that Iran with its government of radical Islamic Mullas are peace-loving, compassionate people: if only the rest of the world would understand. Subtext: if only 'Zionist' Israel would quietly disappear and - in his own words - its Satanic lackeys (the U.S. and the UK) look the other way while Iran, Syria and the other usual suspects do their utmost to create a new Caliphate from one end of the world to the other. Once again, I'm not relaying personal opinions or disinformation: this is documented fact. Of course, one has to take the time and trouble to actually read what's on the program - which is distinctly different from what Ahmadinejad is going to be saying with all the television cameras of the West focussed on him. His latest pronouncement: if the U.S. tries to take out Iran's nuculear program, thousands of Iranian missiles are going to hit Israel. Yeah, that's logical.... I guess. About as logical as the results of the poll "I would rather have as Presdent of the United States: George Bush / Mahmoud Ahmadinejad" on America's premier mainstream liberal website: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/23/224950/843

Good man, but no need to scream it - trust me, I can hear you. Personally, I'd like to see a representative of NAMBLA take the podium at Columbia: I'm certain that like Ahmadenijad, the discourse will be spun in a way as to make us understand that consensual sex with young children is the most natural thing in the world. The audience at Columbia will be getting little more than 'Peace in our time.' http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/worl...icle2520619.ece As a student, does this sound familiar to you?

I just woke up - and it's clear that it's that time you went to bed. I'll be quite interested in seeing which one of us has read his post correctly, Miss V.

The 'world' also used to believe that the earth was flat and was the center of the universe. In some places, 'the world' still believes it's ok to stone a young girl to death because she's been raped and/or 'promiscuous', or to publicly hang homosexuals. Or that it is the duty of one nation to convert those who do not believe in their relgion as revealed truth - and to eliminate those who will not accept it. There are times when it's important to establish the difference between truth, dogma, propaganda, and personal opinion - unless one believes that all truth is relative - which adversaries like Ahmadinejad definitely do not. Beyond that, there are elements of stragegy that you seem to ignore: the mere fact that he's setting foot on our territory and lecturing us as to what's right is seen as a humiliation for the U.S. - a sign of our own weakness and that of the West among the ideologues and strategists he represents. As for 'knowing one's enemy' - we're living in an infomation age in which everything that is said and done ends up on YouTube or Google for the world to see. Under those conditions, there's no need to give this person a public forum in the very country he considers an enemy, just to find out what he thinks: we already know what's on his mind. And beyond that, he is under such intense scrutiny and sophisticated monitoring that every time he breaks wind it is known and is discussed at length by concerned intelligence services around the world. You seem to be substituting the effects of 'what the neighbors are saying' (and who exactly are these neighbors and what might be their agendas, pray tell?) for principles of political and military strategy -not to mention ethics and common sense. It is a fact that Hitler was on the short list for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1939 - despite the fact that there were informed individuals who knew exactly how he got to where he was, what he really was and what his plans were for the rest of the world. As for Mahmoud, we can consider ourselves lucky if the American lunatic fringe doesn't present him as a presidential candidate next year - if nothing else and as you mentioned, because of the accuracy of his opinions.

Some updates on Jordon's condition - relayed as I found them on RWG1 - are in order here. First some bad news: Followed by something good: Although I don't personally know either Jordan or Fordzilla, I felt concerned enough to re-post his request for prayers here. In all fairness to the membership of the old forum, people over there did start responding with offers of their support, best wishes and prayers - in other words, displaying the sort of solidarity with a member in need that we've come to associate with our community. For those here who've taken out a few minutes from watch collecting, families and their own personal problems, thank you: I'm sure your positive thoughts have positive effects - everything we say, do or think is felt in the universe and can sometimes make an enormous difference.... Or so I'd like to believe.

INVITE SLAY! :sss: