Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

kernow

RWG Crew
  • Posts

    4,132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Posts posted by kernow

  1. And in that manner, we should be able to prevent and/or rectify bad feedback left for others in an unjustified manner.

    For example, what's stopping anyone from leaving 10 bad feedbacks for someone else without rhyme or reason?

    Perhaps a mandatory link to the sales thread should be included, and members should be given a chance to appeal bad feedback.

     

    It would give more credit to the RWG feedback system.

     

    Just a thought.

    Indeed, a link to the sale thread is a very good idea. As for Messi10, a swift smack with the ban hammer seems a good idea too.

  2. Okay guys, I'm thinking about building a fantasy Omega: my grail. It's been done before in various guises, here's one photo stolen from the net.

    image_zpsfacb5f50.jpg

    Basically, it's a Seamaster Professional 2254, but with a Seamaster 2230 dial and a PO bezel, crystal and second hand.

    I've been collecting the parts for a while and have either with me, or in transit everything bar the PO bezel, insert and second hand.

    Now, I have a rep 2254 on its way to me and hopefully will be here in a week or so, but do I use a Seamaster GMT case, i.e. sans HEV or do I stick with a 2254 case? Opinions please.

    Here is my rep GMT alongside its gen brother. I could use this or wait for the 2254, which already has a PO crystal installed.

    image_zps7f58e77b.jpg

    I managed to obtain a 2230 dial when I purchased a gen 2230 recently, unfortunately it needs a relume as one of the markers is missing it's lume :(

    The 2230 dial is similar to the 2254, but has lume filled applied markers (white gold?) rather than painted. This makes it look more like a PO dial and some consider it an upgrade. So, should I go sans HEV?

  3. Good job!

    Hey on your bracelet, is there a gap between the end link and first link?

    On my 007 there is :(

    I don't think so, or at least it's not enough to worry about. I'll have a look when I'm home and report back if there is a large gap.

    As for removing the bezel; it just seemed easier to do this first and then remove the insert, also I was conserned about scratching the crystal if I left the bezel in place.

  4. Great job, now you'll be up to frakening yourself an entire watch in no time!

    ......as it happens, I do have a project planned, but it'll be a job for my watchmaker once I gather all the parts together. I'll post up a new thread before I start as I want opinions on a couple of things.

  5. 100% better, still think you could have managed it without taking the bezel of though? iv'e never failed to get one of from the front just takes time and patience

    You're probably right. I was just wary as I didn't know how thick the insert would be and with it being ceramic, I didn't want to risk cracking, snapping, or otherwise breaking it. Anyway, with the bezel tool it only took a minute to remove the bezel.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up