Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Dan71

Member
  • Posts

    260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Dan71

  1. Nice improvement ,

    seem they have also correct the crown before the second and third point touched at the base in other pics that I saw .

    Pic1 and pic2 another rep forum member , Pic3 from opener above.

     

    Still there is a little gap/distance between the O and the L , on the HR 5517 dial this gap isn’t present

    Pic4 form another rep forum member

     

    54da3db906c183dd81c8edcb612e8e1b.jpg&key=ede0e04ed64c00345dfa8d13ffe7a02524d97b362a904d79a776625b81d7a312c1d525973443760b07783b02529d68b8.jpg&key=43f50979bcbefb16e1339a565dd17f74c9221067aa7c25f47962942e85c8f3277bf157d375322aee2840e1c4dc1cdf4c.jpg&key=5bc52308f6d2431d61ec09ad8cf100aea0a82fa2e2f084c7993de4875f711ade

    b6ea3743942db8326b5129ffb906bf2e.jpg&key=d553ba771beec8b2eec85e58e45e3194ea313deb45c95cae74041d590f5eeb0e

     

     

  2. Hi

     

    I was checking the 1665 jkf and seem to me that the bevel / chamfers are not correct .

    pic from supermirror

    601bd61aa703eefcbb9dda41b7ba3ad6.jpg&key=cc93fc2352d7be3965c5eec61817f6c4044bcaefd16d9bc4c10cb00e277cf635

     

    I read that the gen bevel/chamfers was less noticeable than the 5513 and 1680, but on the jkf they are totally absent..

    Seem the jkf have a case of the latter modern rlx .

     

    Below a nos gen 1665 bevel (pic from forum Orologi&passioni)

     

    fec26f411cd5abeee5d9d00981d5fc07.jpg&key=1192b90e87559d6049d4115fcacb7d2b240a9d08c8d545a60a69544657b66f68

    fca42daa477e7b0c6648287f9cd313a2.jpg&key=e1e2f27d859f961df805847d61ad0407b681fe11550490303b25b04d9354e287

     

    Maybe I’m wrong but if you can give me your opinion .

     

    Tks

     

     

     

     

     

     

  3. Tks! a lot of info Automatico some new (for me) other that I already read in other 3d/forum.

     

    I’m more for the 1680 (already I have a cartel mod by RA with gen dial and 2846) but in the future I want improve it.

     

    What about the yuki case that you have sold ?

    I have read that the newest case isn’t like the old one (problem with glued tube if I remember correctly )

     

     

  4. Better with polished bezel ..

     

    I give you same additional info:

     

    -the Clark rotating bezel don't work on the Cartel retaining ring (the Clark is narrow )

    -the Clark Retaining ring work with Clark plexi 25-127 , only is necessary a lot of energy for press it, I used a round plastic tool over the retaining ring and another one on the back and i put the watch (cover with this plastic round tools) inside a manual vise, for press the retaining ring close to the middle case .

    -the Phong bezel insert is flat (I think like gen ) so the plexi come out from the insert 1mm circa more that the cartel insert that is convex..

     

    3f97d7f110ccce13781a5dcaa0ce551e.jpg806c37d353f2c7da7732d6e863c94f47.jpg

  5. New entry:

    Clark bezel assembly + phong insert..

     

    I have sweat 7 shirts for install the retaining ring :-( and still is not perfect..

    after 50 or more turn with vigor now the bezel ring rotate correctly but is still hard to rotate , it is without bezel spring because with it installed the bezel don't rotate at all :-(

     

    I have a doubt if I should polish the bezel or keep rough

     

    e0a60a7f51617bb4e4e1cc34bb8a73df.jpgcfa857ff566949319cdc148f4f7a3929.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up