freddy333 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 The 'Mick Jagger' 6538, named not because he wears this model, but because it has an ugly/hot face There is just something about these extreme tropical dials that turn a classic beauty into a VERY hot babe. This was the look (minus the damage) I was after with my 6536/1 project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 If it wasn't for the damage to the dial, I think I would really like that I'm all for a little 'character' in a watch case, but that kind of damage to the dial... That's going just a bit too far for my taste The actual color combinations though, look really nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwatch Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Wow TJ, I am surprised! I thought for sure this would be right up your alley! I do like the color aging is super cool though! I would agree that the damage is a little too much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Wow TJ, I am surprised! I thought for sure this would be right up your alley! I do like the color aging is super cool though! I would agree that the damage is a little too much! Even I have my limits Abuse to the case is one thing, and aging of the dial, again, no problem, but real damage like that, a little too extreme for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docblackrock Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 The 'Mick Jagger' 6538, named not because he wears this model, but because it has an ugly/hot face Looking at the ravaged features of that dial I'd say it was more of a 'Keith Richards' 6538 to be honest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornerstone Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Looking at the ravaged features of that dial I'd say it was more of a 'Keith Richards' 6538 to be honest Gee, it's practically a Marc Bolan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dluddy Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 I don't know about Marc Bolan but it does look like a T-Rex wore this thing for a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornerstone Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 I don't know about Marc Bolan but it does look like a T-Rex wore this thing for a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now