vlydog Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Considering having the lug holes drilled on my WM9 16610 V2. That way, I can use my gen 93150 bracelet and gen spring bars. What do the experts think? THanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosnik Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 I tested on V1. YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 It's purely personal pref. If you like the older style with lug holes, then I see no reason against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klocklind1 Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 The old way with the holes drilled all the way is stronger because the pins is thicker and goes in to the case longer way in to the case. But perhaps it does not look as good!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlydog Posted October 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Are the drilled lug holes compatible with the dial that is currently being used on the WM9 V2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Are the drilled lug holes compatible with the dial that is currently being used on the WM9 V2? Yes, because Rolex produced SELs + lugholes + superluminova combo for many years (before switching to no lugholes). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 i think the noob dial looks better on a lughole sub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now