One of BK's?

[highoeyazmuhudee]

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner-16610-Black-Face-Mens-Watch_W0QQitemZ190378526502QQcmdZViewItemQQptZWristwatches?hash=item2c5371c726

seller claims D serial

crown looks low

pearl looks odd

looks like a familiar face

what do you think?

[Cats]

I'm certainly not an expert but it doesn't look gen to me.

For me a it's clear , when people try to sell a gen Rolex you at leastpost decent pics

so you don't get suspicious.

Also no feedback makes it i a bit tricky.

Just my 2 cents

Carpe Diem

Cats

[lanikai]

Also am not an expert, but it looks like a gen. the insert is a gen.. the indices look good.. the crown appears low due to the angle of the shot, imo.. but the crown itself looks good... as does the clasp.

the only thing I would take issue with is this is the sellers first.. and on that alone I would be 50/50 on actually doing the deal..

[alvinado]

it is a wm9 damn, crown is too big, pearl is wrong..

[alvinado]

sels are off..

[gillorin]

Looks real to me but the photos aren't good enough to make me 100% positive.

[kbh]

WM9 has a very distinct case back compared to my other 2 subs. The lip on the case back where the case back meets the case on the WM9 is approx 1/2mm and on the others it's approx 1mm. From what you can see in the pictures I'd go with it's a WM9 case.

Also as mentioned, the fit on the SEL is terrible.

[highoeyazmuhudee]

wm9 has a distinct look in general, after building one it's hard to not recognize it at a glance. also there are no close ups of any stampings or markings. THIS IS A WM9, my instinct tells me so.