zajkis Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 Hello guys, I really like your forum, because theres lots of information about the watches here and it is really helpful. It is my first post here as well. I've purchased the new Rolex Submariner 116610 LN replica watch, and want to show you some of it's pics. Also i would like to ask if the new Rolex Submariner has the same bracelet as the older version. And what do you think about the bezel does it look like original? Give me some feedback on this, I would really appreciate that Here are some pictures: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 The 2010 Submariner should have the glidelock clasp, so that is correct I don't know enough to comment on the accuracy of the insert, but I'm sure someone else can comment on that aspect Nice watch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbh Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 The pearl looks off center. I've seen a couple of new ones like that unless you've posted pictures on other forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 The pearl looks off center. I've seen a couple of new ones like that unless you've posted pictures on other forums. I think (might be wrong) that is just lighting and shadow giving that impression Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zajkis Posted July 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 TeeJay is correct it's the lihgtning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackjo Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 That looks like the new V series that Perfect is offering. It looks very good in your pictures. I wonder how it compares to the M Noob version. The one that BK is modding. I want to pick up one or the other and do the AR mod for date mag. I have given up trying to find another gen crystal with AR'd cyclops. I am thinking that it might not fit this anyway since it did not seem to fit the Ultimate GMTIIc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnkay Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 You have a nice specimen that isn't beat by other versions I've seen. Still not accurate vs. gen as compared to the GMT-IIc vs. gen, but very nice nonetheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackjo Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 What do you see that makes this not as accurate as the 116710 rep? Just wondering. You have a nice specimen that isn't beat by other versions I've seen. Still not accurate vs. gen as compared to the GMT-IIc vs. gen, but very nice nonetheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnkay Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 What do you see that makes this not as accurate as the 116710 rep? Just wondering. I love the sub-c reps, don't get me wrong, but they are based on the GMT-IIc case and hands, which are not correct for the sub. The new sub case has noticeably thicker lugs and is not as tall/thick as the GMT-IIc. The sub-c does not have a maxi hour hand like the GMT-IIc has. Also, the bracelet links are thinner on the sub-c and have brushed sides. Some of these differences are actually nice (i.e. thicker case, thicker bracelet and maxi hour hand), but take away from the accuracy. Personally, I'd love to just have the wider lugs and better hour markers (they are bigger on the gen and have much thinner metal/gold around them). Sure, it may not be totally accurate, but it would incorporate the things that are in my mind better about the gen while keeping the things I think are better about the rep intact. I don't care if I get called out, it would be a sweet rep! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackjo Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 If you are correct in your details then those are some great observations. I had built a super GMTIIC last year. It had gen crystal with AR, Gen ceramic platinum insert, CHS movement and Vaclume. For some stupid reason I sold it and cannot imagine being able to build another one like it. I would really be quite happy to just come up with a gen Rolex crystal again with AR coating on the cyclops and build another GMT or the new Sub. The crystals are very hard to come by and modding one like Lanikai did a while back is just past my patience limit for waiting for crystals to come back from the AR modders. Another problem is that I am not sure the gen crystal will fit the new Ultimate GMT or Sub case. I think I had heard somewhere that it will not fit like it did the previous version. Such is our hobby... I love the sub-c reps, don't get me wrong, but they are based on the GMT-IIc case and hands, which are not correct for the sub. The new sub case has noticeably thicker lugs and is not as tall/thick as the GMT-IIc. The sub-c does not have a maxi hour hand like the GMT-IIc has. Also, the bracelet links are thinner on the sub-c and have brushed sides. Some of these differences are actually nice (i.e. thicker case, thicker bracelet and maxi hour hand), but take away from the accuracy. Personally, I'd love to just have the wider lugs and better hour markers (they are bigger on the gen and have much thinner metal/gold around them). Sure, it may not be totally accurate, but it would incorporate the things that are in my mind better about the gen while keeping the things I think are better about the rep intact. I don't care if I get called out, it would be a sweet rep! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnkay Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 Such is our hobby... Yep! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.