watcher Posted July 23, 2010 Report Share Posted July 23, 2010 Today I received this watch after 9 days of customs trauma. Some of you may have read in the other Sub 2010 post that this package was stopped by UK customs(the 1st time ever for me!) and I was asked to declare the contents and provide an invoice. I sent an invoice with a description saying stainless steel watch bracelet valued at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z80 Posted July 23, 2010 Report Share Posted July 23, 2010 Pretty nice, except it looks like you are owed a new hour hand. Also, a bit disapointed in the lower endlink fit.. I think this is the same as the GMT IIC case and the bracelet fir on the better versions of that was perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted July 23, 2010 Report Share Posted July 23, 2010 Ditto z80's comments. Aside from the mismatched lume colors, very nice indeed. If you have not already done so, I would get the movement serviced to be sure it keeps ticking as beautifully as it looks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnkay Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 I'm wondering when and if the rep factories are going to get around to accurately reproducing the ceramic sub since it is no longer a fantasy model. To make it accurate, they have to make the lugs 0.6 mm wider each (visually quite noticeable vs. the gmt-c case)and make the lume dots larger. Those would be the good improvements for accuracy sake. The not-so-good changes for accuracy sake would require thinner bracelet links (for the permannt links),a thinner case, and a narrower hour hand (on the gen, only the minute hand is "maxi"). Again, the rep is superior to the gen in that the bracelet is thicker, the hour hand is thicker and the case is thicker, but I do really wish they could at least get lume dots to look like gen and fatten up the lugs (I know many people don't like the supercase, but the sub is visually distinguishable from the GMT-IIc case in terms of lug thickness). I have a feeling (wonder why) that it will take years to get an accurate sub-c reproduction.BTW, nice sub, I have a few of them myself. Didn't mean to take away from it. They are fantastic in their own rites, but felt the need to put it out there that the gen is here and it is different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnkay Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 Oh, and of course the double AR on the cyclops, but that has seems to be widely known. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.