bklm1234 Posted September 26, 2006 Report Posted September 26, 2006 I can't tell from the pics. Does it have the correct magnification?
By-Tor Posted September 26, 2006 Report Posted September 26, 2006 Can't really tell from your picture, either. It's a bit blurry...almost invisible.
Watchmeister Posted September 26, 2006 Report Posted September 26, 2006 By-Tor- You have got to get your eyes checked.
ubiquitous Posted September 26, 2006 Report Posted September 26, 2006 Here's a pic of my modified TW Best 16610; the basis of the watch is from Eddie. Date mag looks good to me. Rehaut is good too... Best of all... Etched crown @ 6:00 is nearly invisible
bklm1234 Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Posted September 26, 2006 Ubi, Eddie sells 2 versions of sub: TW Classic Sub http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=11475. But it's all sold out. and his New Sub http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=8192. I bet yours is the TW Classic. Do you know his New Sub has the correct mag?
lionsandtigers Posted September 26, 2006 Report Posted September 26, 2006 i just ordered one of those, it should be here in the next day or 2, so i will give it a good look as soon it arrives and let you know. from what i know, i have heard nothing but great things about this model which is what propted me to purchase it.
ubiquitous Posted September 26, 2006 Report Posted September 26, 2006 Ubi, Eddie sells 2 versions of sub: TW Classic Sub http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=11475. But it's all sold out. and his New Sub http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=8192. I bet yours is the TW Classic. Do you know his New Sub has the correct mag? Mine is neither- It's definitely not the same as the new Sub, and it's not the TW Best Classic either (as that one has lug holes, and some other characteristics that differ, like the bezel, etc). I thought that mine was similar to cheiftang's, but we had discussed it and came to the conclusion that mine is still different than his. Mine is, perhaps the closest to Jos', but mine still has a slightly deeper rehaut. The watch in my hands did come from EL, which was then traded to me in a transaction. Aside from that, I don't know much more about it's origins...
Linder Posted September 27, 2006 Report Posted September 27, 2006 Leave it to Ubi to have the best mystery watch too!
ubiquitous Posted September 27, 2006 Report Posted September 27, 2006 Hell... I wish I knew exactly what my basis watch was... I'd like to build another!
DWSmoot Posted September 27, 2006 Report Posted September 27, 2006 In my recent search to purchase a sub, I have considerd EL's version as follows: http://www.replica-watches-guide.com/forum...showtopic=32775 In El's description he states "thick mag" so I sent him an email to ask exactly what that meant. The reponse I got was "Yes, it is 2.5". Can only report what the response was and don't have first hand knowledge as I don't have the actual watch...yet. Hope this helps, DW
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now