Cardshark00 Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 The lume shot was tough to get, sorry its not better. 09 pro hunter on the left and 10 stainless on right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkoN Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 thanks for the pics, is the ROLEXROLEX aligned correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardshark00 Posted December 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 thanks for the pics, is the ROLEXROLEX aligned correct? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkoN Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 thanks what do you think is the biggest flaw on the 2010 rolex cerachrom ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnkay Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 One flaw that all versions share to the same degree is the smaller-than-gen hour markers and thicker-than gen lume holders (the ring around the lume dots). I can spot a rep every time because of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 looks good. for me the tell on any sub rep are the hands, more specifically the hour hand, study the gen and the rep and you'll notice the tell, i can spot them a mile away now and dont even have to look at the rest since no rolex sub or sea dweller ever came with an hour hand like this. apparently no reps can get this little flaw correct making the rest irrelevant. well i shouldn't say NO rep, the WM9 v2 was the only one with correct hands, im afraid even the new tw sub is incorrect. look at the base of the hour hand gen this tiny yet very important detail makes all the difference, now you know and you'll be spotting it all the time as it sticks out like a sore thumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardshark00 Posted January 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 I dont see the diff ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 (edited) let me try and illustrate it better gen 5513 vs PT 1665 hour hand comparison. no matter which sport model you look at with mercedes style hands going all the way back to the early 5513s the hour lume always go to the base, this is true even with the new ceramic. reps however can never seem to get this little detail correct with the exception of the wm9s. to me this is an instant tell when im looking at pieces, to others probably not. even yuki, clarks, and WO hands have this problem. luckily i got 1 pair of wm9 hands but had wished i'd gotten more. its a little thing but its the little things that make the difference. its like if the mona lisas smile was slightly off when being authenticated an expert would notice the slight difference and the casual browser would know something wasnt right but couldnt quite put their finger on it Edited January 18, 2011 by highoeyazmuhudee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cls Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 I dont see the diff ? +1. Even with the second explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixbennetts Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 Are you talking about how close the shaft lume gets to the center pin on the hour hand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.