irolexu Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 Just thought RWG could use a little challenge...rep or gen? Crystal is not original to this watch so exclude this on your judgement 1
correctime Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 (edited) Can we get a pic from the side showing the crown height ?? Insert looks gen. Edited March 22, 2012 by correctime
Robaer Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 Rep. Crown guards and crown position. Also the sels look a bit different than gen, in the photos at least. Another thing I thought of was the bezel teeth and the shape of the "4" on the insert. Though the bezel font may vary depending on the year? But then it wouldn't be correct for a no lug holes case? And shouldn't the date font have seriffs? Of course, it's easy to believe you're seeing tells when you're starring at the screen looking for them...
correctime Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 I don't know what "seriffs" are but the DW doesn't look to be the correct champagne color either.
irolexu Posted March 22, 2012 Author Report Posted March 22, 2012 Rep. Wm9 v3 gen insert, crown and tube
irolexu Posted March 23, 2012 Author Report Posted March 23, 2012 yeah good call what was the big give away here...I am for sure going gen crystal and possibly genuine dial
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now