agp Posted June 1, 2012 Report Share Posted June 1, 2012 I'm going to get a nonchrono Spitfire soon, but I was curious which one is more accurate/reliable? The XV or XVI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomhorn Posted June 2, 2012 Report Share Posted June 2, 2012 XVI is a much better rep. Far more accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bardamu Posted June 2, 2012 Report Share Posted June 2, 2012 My choice : XVI, white dial. Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HartDoc Posted June 2, 2012 Report Share Posted June 2, 2012 thats look scary close to gen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adeodatus Posted June 3, 2012 Report Share Posted June 3, 2012 The dial on black xv is more accurate, IMHO. But if you're after spitfire, read my review on it (in my sig ). Anyway I love the watch, accurate and more importantly - looks great on the wrist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bardamu Posted June 4, 2012 Report Share Posted June 4, 2012 The dial on black xv is more accurate, IMHO. But if you're after spitfire, read my review on it (in my sig ). Anyway I love the watch, accurate and more importantly - looks great on the wrist. You're right, the dial of Spit XVI is not perfect. The guillochage on the white parts (where are the dots) is missing. I knew that point when I decided to buy this watch, but the most important for me was that I really like the design of this watch, and the way it looks. Accuracy was less important for me, because almost nobody is able to realize that it's a rep. Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now