HauteHippie Posted November 9, 2012 Author Report Posted November 9, 2012 (edited) Don't know who Sean is, so not a Sean case. Ubi saw it for the first time yesterday. So not an Ubi build. Edited November 9, 2012 by chieftang
Fixen Posted November 9, 2012 Report Posted November 9, 2012 Gen or TC with gen parts Ok i say TC with gen insert, crystal from londongeorge and V3 bracelet Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HauteHippie Posted November 9, 2012 Author Report Posted November 9, 2012 Not a londongeorge crystal.
dan_189 Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 Great build its a TC case with a V3 bracelet, genuine dial, crystal and Gen or TC with gen parts Ok i say TC with gen insert, crystal from londongeorge and V3 bracelet Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk +1 Give-aways include: - the "14" on the plastic on the 1st pic, was the same on my V3 - Bezel teeth dont look deep enough (definitely a genuine insert) - Hand stack I'm gonna play odd man out here and say Sean case gen components? What's the verdict Lugs are too good to be a Sean case Not a londongeorge crystal. Londongeorges crystals are genuine and AR'ed Congrats!
irolexu Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 Sweet build welcome to the super 16610 club
dan_189 Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 Sweet build welcome to the super 16610 club
freddk Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 The dial looks gen, bracelet is probably TC V3...
janeto72 Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) Franken TC sub....gen crown,tube gen bezel insert...gen dial....definately a TC V4 sub with V3 bracelet.It is just amazing how good the TC sub is......scary amazing!!! Edited November 10, 2012 by janeto72
Fixen Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 It's easy to tell what it is after chieftang told the specs in another thread Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
janeto72 Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 no.....really????chief spoiled it for me.....lol!
HauteHippie Posted November 10, 2012 Author Report Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) Ya the V3 TC bracelet is silly good for $40 or $50 or whatever it was. The clasp though.... leaves a bit to be desired. I may just order a factory fresh gen 93250 down the road. But the idea here was to put together a relatively low cost beater franken with a fairly high degree of accuracy, so a gen bracelet at this point kind of crosses the intended cost threshold. I'm only in to this thing for about $1300 right now I think. Finding a used gen under $5k in good shape is almost undoable now, so I don't think I've gone overboard just yet. EDIT: Upon double-checking 93250 prices these days, I think I'll scrap that idea. The TC V3 is just fine! I spent less for a factory fresh Daytona bracelet for my 16520! Edited November 10, 2012 by chieftang
panerai153 Posted November 10, 2012 Report Posted November 10, 2012 Absolutely insame how expensive Rolex bracelets have become. Totally out the roof for a basically mass produced item. It certainly doesn't take a watchmakers skills to assemble a bracelet!!
dan_189 Posted November 11, 2012 Report Posted November 11, 2012 Ya the V3 TC bracelet is silly good for $40 or $50 or whatever it was. The clasp though.... leaves a bit to be desired. I may just order a factory fresh gen 93250 down the road. But the idea here was to put together a relatively low cost beater franken with a fairly high degree of accuracy, so a gen bracelet at this point kind of crosses the intended cost threshold. I'm only in to this thing for about $1300 right now I think. Finding a used gen under $5k in good shape is almost undoable now, so I don't think I've gone overboard just yet. EDIT: Upon double-checking 93250 prices these days, I think I'll scrap that idea. The TC V3 is just fine! I spent less for a factory fresh Daytona bracelet for my 16520! I think a gen 93250 is slightly too small in width to fit a TC case, that one of the primary reasons I went a Sean case. The lugs on the TC do look amazing though!
cougar1 Posted November 11, 2012 Report Posted November 11, 2012 (edited) Fantastic watch chief. Anyone else experience this or am I imagining things: the tc bezel teeth cut on both tc bezels I am looking at here is uneven...very very slightly, i guess it's down to factory variances, but about half way around both bezels they are nice and deep, and the other half not cut as strongly. It is very subtle and only reallly noticeable when looking very closely or via a loupe...which is not worth doing imo. I don't care about something like this in terms of vs gen, but just wonder if anyone noticed the same thing? Sorry I know this has nothing to do with chiefs sub, but just an observation with mine? Edited November 11, 2012 by cougar1
HauteHippie Posted November 11, 2012 Author Report Posted November 11, 2012 The bezel teeth are even as far as I can tell. The pic tends to distort things a bit I do think...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now