Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have both TC & BK WM9 subs and gen 16610 dials.  IMHO, both TC & WM9 dials are accurate (close to gen than other reps).  However TC dial's print (whiteness) is "noticeably" lighter (in color) when comparing side-by-side with WM9 dial.  Itcould have been rep dials are inconsistently made/produced.  But that's what I have.

 

Both dials have good lume, don't see difference.

 

Dial's size and feet--no info.  You can check TC blog and WM9 sub review for more info.

Posted

Have both TC & BK WM9 subs and gen 16610 dials.  IMHO, both TC & WM9 dials are accurate (close to gen than other reps).  However TC dial's print (whiteness) is "noticeably" lighter (in color) when comparing side-by-side with WM9 dial.  Itcould have been rep dials are inconsistently made/produced.  But that's what I have.

 

Both dials have good lume, don't see difference.

 

Dial's size and feet--no info.  You can check TC blog and WM9 sub review for more info.

Compare the brightness of the TC dial font to the gen dials of that era :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up