QC query on a Planet Ocean pearl

[daryn23]

 

Nice easy question.  I know the pearls are low on these, but is this one what anyone would consider "too low"  Not sure about there being no gap at all between it and the edges of the triangle

 

Thanks

[SSTEEL]

As Mike says replace bezel if you want to better it.  Is this an older model Seamaster?  I was under the impression the word "Seamaster" was in red on this model.

[martijnp]

Giving my new Hublot some wrist time

[daryn23]

It's a v5 rep so not sure if it's of older model. Presume so

It's a v5 rep so not sure if it's of older model. Presume so

[SSTEEL]

V5 should have Seamaster in Red like the 45mm PO below...

 

[SSTEEL]

I maybe getting V5 mixed up with UPO (Ultimate) model 

[daryn23]

It appears that the older 2901.51.82 model has Seamaster written in white

 

[daryn23]

Have rejected it anyway because of the bad marks of some sort between the 6 and 7 marker

[SSTEEL]

 

It appears that the older 2901.51.82 model has Seamaster written in white

 

 

 

Ah ok, I guess V5 relates to this model then ^^^

[B3nj4min3]

I bought the pumpkin 45 mm version and the pearl on that one also pretty much touches the bottom of the triangle as you can see below.

 

I decided to just stick with it as it didn't bother me enough to warrant to change/fix it though I may get it fixed in the future.

 

[horz]

I maybe getting V5 mixed up with UPO (Ultimate) model 

 

That watch in the initial pics is a v5 42mm PO. The UPO is the 45mm version. Both are the older, non-ceramic, models.

 

And the pic you posted from TT is the newer 45mm PO with the ceramic insert. I think they're still v1 at the moment, not sure.

 

Can get a bit confusing at times, but such is the nature of the rep game!

[SSTEEL]

Thanks mate, not yet ventured into the Omega reps yet, so a little rusty lol